Assignment title: Information
Module 3 - Case
DISTRIBUTION & MARKETING PLAN
Assignment Overview
One interesting aspect of distribution channels occurs when a retailer, in this case, Amazon, integrates
backward with the intent of attracting suppliers (authors with brand names) and the expectation of
utilizing other outlets (traditional bookstores) for full distribution of its products. In this example, the
largest traditional bookstore chain, which also has a significant online business, has decided not to stock
Amazon's products in the hope of discouraging authors from signing publication contracts with Amazon.
Effective distribution channels call for vertical cooperation, here among authors and their agents,
publishers, and retail outlets. But vertical integration invites conflicts. The battle between Amazon and
Barnes & Noble deserves further attention.
Case Reading
Review the followings articles related to recent developments in book retailing (Use the university
online library search engine on TLC homepage to find the articles):
Gelles, D. (2014, Feb 22). Barnes & noble receives conditional offer. New York Times.
Krug, N. (2012, Oct 31). Amazon books getting no shelf space. The Washington Post.
Herther, N. K. (2012). THE E BOOK WARS amazon versus the rest. Searcher, 20(4), 20-23,26-30.
Streitfeld, D. (2014). Feed the beast (or else). The New York Times, pp. 1.
Trachtenberg, J. A. (2013). Barnes & noble pulls back after losses in tablet wars. Wall Street Journal.
Europe.
Turner, K. (2012, Feb 05). Independent retailers turn page on business. McClatchy - Tribune Business
News.
Case Assignment
Develop a report in terms of the following guidelines based on the articles listed above and other
supplemental articles. A well-written report should have a brief introduction, headings or subheadings,
and a brief concluding comment. Note that you should use some keywords as headings or subheadings
such as "Facts Recap," instead of a sentence or a question.
1. Briefly review the facts on the battle between Amazon and Barnes & Noble reported in the
articles.
2. Was Amazon wise to get into publishing in addition to its very strong position in retailing new
and used books? Explain your answer.
3. If you were a popular author of children's fiction (with a successful past relationship with a
traditional publisher) and your agent (another member of the book publishing channel) asked
you whether to approach Amazon regarding the publication of your latest project, what would
you say? Why?
4. Would it matter if you were working on your first book and had no previous relationship with an
editor or publisher? If yes, why would this make a difference?
5. Considering traditional and contemporary distribution channels, and with the continuing decline
of its e-book sales, how would you recommend Barnes & Noble compete with Amazon in the
future? Do you think acquisition is a feasible solution for Barnes & Noble? Why?
Assignment Expectations Regarding Your References and Defense of Your Positions
Write clearly, simply and logically. Your paper should be 750-1,000 words long, excluding title pages and
references, but quality of writing is more important than length. Use double-spaced, black Verdana or
Times Roman font in 12 pt. type size.
Back up your positions or opinions with references to the required reading found in the Module 1-3
Background reading and Ongoing Useful Resources. In using those references, demonstrate your
understanding of the concepts presented. Rather than grading on how much information you find,
emphasis will be on the defense of the positions you take on the issues. Also remember that:
1. The "why" is more important than the "what."
2. The defense of your positions on the issues is more important than the positions you take.
Do not repeat or quote definitions. Your use of the required reading to support your opinions (that is,
contentions or positions) should demonstrate that you understand the concepts presented.
Do not include definitions or summaries of the readings or simply describe what the company did.
Instead, your responses to the questions should be analytical and should demonstrate that (a) you
understand the principles from the background reading and (b) you can apply them to this particular
case. Vague, general answers will not earn a good grade.
Avoid redundancy and general statements such as "All organizations exist to make a profit." Make every
sentence count.
Paraphrase the facts using your own words and ideas, employing quotes sparingly. Quotes, if absolutely
necessary, should rarely exceed five words.
When writing an academically oriented paper, you will uncover many facts about the product. If you
paraphrase the facts, cite the sources in your text and link those citations to references at the end of the
paper.
Here are some guidelines on how to conduct information search and build critical thinking skills.
Emerald Group Publishing. (n.d.). Searching for Information. Retrieved from
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/learning/study_skills/skills/searching.htm
Emerald Group Publishing. (n.d.). Developing Critical Thinking. Retrieved from
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/learning/study_skills/skills/critical_thinking.htm
Guidelines for handling quoted and paraphrased material are found at:
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). Academic Writing. Retrieved from
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/1/2/
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing. Retrieved from
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/563/1/
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). Avoiding Plagiarism. Retrieved from
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/589/1/
Your paper consists of arguments in favor of your opinions or positions on the issues addressed by the
guidelines; therefore, avoid the following logical fallacies:
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). Logic in Argumentative Writing. Retrieved from
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/