ATo be supplied to students when they receive the coursework assignment task Unit Co-ordinator: Janice Johnson Unit Name: Leading and Managing People Unit Code: SHR012-6 Title of Coursework: Assignment 2 - Making the case for LMP % weighting of final unit grade: 50% Feedback details The university policy is that you will receive prompt feedback on your work within 15 working days of the submission date. Exceptionally where this is not achievable (for example due to staff sickness) you will be notified as soon as possible of the revised date and the reasons behind the change. Submission Date: Thursday 25 th August by Noon Oman time Feedback Date: 15 th September 2016 Details of how to access the feedback: Students will access individual feedback via Turnitin on BREO. Leading and Managing People (SHR012-6) Referral Assignment 2: Making the Case for LMP 2 Aim: To develop a critical awareness of current factors affecting leading and managing people and to demonstrate how effective policies can add value to the business' strategic goals. Learning Outcomes: To be able to  Debate and critically evaluate the characteristics of effective leadership and the methods used to develop leaders in organisations.  Debate and critically evaluate the leading theories behind group and team effectiveness and flexibility at all levels in organisations.  Critically evaluate the dilemmas of ethical and responsible behaviour that managers face offering appropriate analytical tools to help manage them  Critically evaluate and analyse the effectiveness of change management in organisations. Context: You receive an Email from a senior manager in your organisation (has no formal qualifications) who has been told he has to send three members of his junior management team on an MBA course. He has received information about the course from the local university but needs clarification on the content of one of the units being offered in year one. He knows you have completed this course. The email says: "I have been reading about this unit, Leading and Managing People. The course information says it is not a subject like Financial Management or Quantitative Methods in Business, but I am not convinced of its purpose. What value will the topic managing change really add to my staff's development and how will they ever use the concepts learned? The brochure says there are really no right or wrong answers so far as the leadership and management of people are concerned. Are you able to explain to me why this is the case and what this all means please?" Your Task: Formulate a critical and constructive response to this manager in the form of a short report on this topic (managing change) incorporating evidence-based argument to support your views and to advise what he should do. 3 Assignment Guidance Section / Title Details / Guidance University Coversheet Include name, student ID number, unit title and code, assessment title, date of submission. Title page Title of short report. Address (to/from) and date the report. Introduction Short introduction to the discussion initially clarifying why Leading and Managing People is a relevant unit to study and also identifying the topic you intend to discuss in making the business case for this assignment. (approximately 250 words) Task Discussion of topic Provide a detailed and critical discussion of the topic chosen. Ensure you define the area clearly and include relevant academic literature, theories and current thinking about the topic. Evaluate the merits and disadvantages of this topic area to a business. How well does it work and what causes it to go wrong? Citations from or references to research and /or other sources of evidence is expected. It will also be useful to include examples of this topic in action in current organisations to show how knowledge about leadership and management has been systematically applied to improve individual and corporate outcomes. You may also wish to challenge the manager's view that there are no 'right' answers in the people leadership/management arena: even if the answers aren't absolutely 'right', are there some answers which are better than others? Please make sure you include in your answer materials from the course and do not rely on random internet sources where quality is not benchmarked. (around 1000 words) Conclusion and recommendations Summarise the main findings from your discussion and make your final suggestions to this manager. (around 250 words) Reference List A list of the third-party sources you have consulted and which are cited directly in the text. All these sources should be properly identified. Harvard style (see the Learning Resources website: lrweb.beds.ac.uk/help/guide-to- ref). Executive Summary / Appendices No Executive Summary / appendices should be included Word Limit 1500 words +/- 10% Submission Deadline for submission is Thursday 25 th August 2016 May by Noon Oman time. You should submit your report electronically via Turnitin on BREO. Assessment Criteria As illustrated below Poor Academic Practice Please see appendix A at the end of this brief for guidance on this issue. 4 Marking Guidelines Outstanding/Excellent (Mark Band: 70-100%) Knowledge and Understanding Knowledge of the subject matter concerning the chosen topic area – both the theoretical/academic literature and the illustrative cases is demonstrably comprehensive. The reader can be confident that this student 'knows his/her stuff', with a judicious mix of factual knowledge and critical evaluation. Presentation and Persuasion The discussion presented is produced in strict conformity with the guidelines contained in the assignment brief. The text is wide-ranging, the style mature, the approach measured, the presentation reader-friendly. Third-party sources are properly described, and the logic of the argument throughout the discussion is strongly persuasive. Commendable (Mark Band: 60-69%) Knowledge and Understanding The discussion exhibits quite a good understanding of the topic area from both the theoretical and applied perspectives. The submission is liberally supplied with references to and citations from authoritative third-party sources. Presentation and Persuasion The overall presentation of the discussion is articulate, lucid, structurally sensible and mature in expression. The issues of the chosen topic area are clearly explained and the subtleties concerning its operation in practice are discussed in an appropriately logical, clinical and persuasive fashion. The references are organised conscientiously and comprehensively. Good Pass (Mark Band: 50-59%) Knowledge and Understanding Some of the essential literature and research sources on the chosen topic area have been consulted and are referenced throughout the discussion. Occasionally the student relies upon some low-level citations; some third-party material may even be quoted without question. The discussion appears quite strong on description and narrative but needs more evaluation and critique. Presentation and Persuasion Though the discussion presented is generally systematic, there are improvements that the student should have implemented, for example, over-long and discursive paragraphs or too short and fragmented paragraphs which render some pages un-reader- friendly. There is scope to make the discussion even more persuasive. Satisfactory Pass (Mark Band: 40-49%) Knowledge and Understanding Limited range of literature and research sources on the chosen topic area has been consulted and is referenced throughout the discussion. There is over-reliance on low-level citations and third-party material may even be quoted without question. The discussion appears reasonable enough on description and narrative but needs a more developed approach to establish a good evaluative argument. Presentation and Persuasion 5 Though the discussion presented is reasonably systematic, there are improvements that the student should have implemented, for example, over-long and discursive sections/paragraphs or too short and fragmented sections/paragraphs which render some pages un-reader- friendly. There is scope to make the discussions more logical and coherent to persuade much more. There is scope for the work to be better organised. Marginal Fail/Fail (Mark Band:35-39% ; 1-34%) Knowledge and Understanding There is little evidence that the student has undertaken any serious study about the chosen topic area. Instead, the discussion presented relies upon a very limited number of largely low-level, descriptive and narrative sources which are presented uncritically. There may be elementary errors and omissions. Presentation and Persuasion The structure of the discussion presented is unacceptable, as it deviates from the model presented in the assignment brief yet does so without any attempt to persuade the reader that such deviations might be legitimate. Section headings are not used, or do not reflect the contents beneath; the references are confused or omitted. There is scope for the work to be better organised. Appendix A: Academic Discipline Policy (extracted from the Academic Discipline Policy September 2014) New registrations (first teaching term/semester) i. A student registering for the first time at the University of Bedfordshire, and who submits an assignment within the first teaching term of the start of their taught course (i.e. the submission deadline occurs before the end of the teaching period) and who is found to have made use of the words and/or ideas of others with attribution that is inaccurate or incomplete (poor referencing), but where it is possible to evaluate the submission for grading purposes, will have their work graded and returned only within the context of a face to face discussion between the marker and the student, recorded on the APG1 form. The form will be kept on record in the Faculty. ii. A student who has made unattributed use of the ideas and/or words of others, with no evidence of attempt to acknowledge sources (bad academic practice), the work will be considered a fail (grade F-) and the student required to undertake specified guidance and support as a condition of referral. A record of the occurrence will be maintained within the Faculty (AOF). In such cases, a letter from the Faculty Dean will confirm: a) the process and penalty to be applied (as above); b) the requirement for guidance and advice, and for confirmation that this has been undertaken, as a condition of resubmission; c) the date of the meeting for guidance if it has been set, or a requirement to arrange a meeting with the tutor for guidance by a set date. After the first term/semester iii. All other students at level 2 (FHEQ 5), or above, which are not new registrations in their first teaching term/semester, will be deemed to have a responsibility for the proactive development of their academic practice and sufficient ability to be permitted to register with advanced standing or status. iv. Bad academic practice will be treated as an issue of academic concern where it constitutes the unattributed use of the ideas and/or words of others, with no evidence of 6 attempt to acknowledge sources (bad academic practice) or the use of the ideas and/or words of others with attribution that is incomplete and/or inaccurate (poor referencing): v. The work containing bad academic practice will be considered a fail (grade 1 F-) and the student required to undertake specified guidance and support as a condition of referral, and confirm by a specified deadline that this support has been received, noting this on the AGP2 form. vi. A record of the occurrence will be maintained within the faculty (AOF) Where a student does not attend for guidance on the set date, or does not arrange a meeting by the specified date, this will be taken to mean that the student fully understands the University regulations regarding acceptable academic practice, and that the student does not require guidance. This should be recorded on the AOF and any further academic offences will be referred automatically to the ACP. For all students with a recorded academic concern, any subsequent case arising in the work of the same student, and which is deemed, on the basis of available evidence including the support provided in response to earlier similar issues, to reflect a breach of the principles of good academic practice will be referred automatically to the ACP using the AOF form unless they meet the criteria set out in 4.5.1 above. Guidance on academic practice 1. Good academic practice Good academic practice is the use of ideas, research findings and text by a learner in ways that recognise where these represent the knowledge of others. It is important because it enables learners:  To demonstrate their breadth of reading by identifying and comparing their sources of information;  To demonstrate an individual understanding of their findings as they learn, by using their words to describe and interpret the ideas of others;  To develop their own originality by synthesising, commenting on and structuring their argument around the contributions of others;  To apply their reading and their understanding to a range of subjects and situations in ways that make clear their process and their conclusions. To do this, learners are required to: Recognise the origins of ideas and of statements, where these are not theirs, to recognise the difference between the two, and to deal with each appropriately within their own work.  Report accurately the findings of their research (primary and secondary)  Submit work for assessment that represents their individual and independent effort unless otherwise advised in the assessment brief.  Doing this is good academic practice. Referencing systems are used to identify where a writer is using the ideas and words of others. They ensure that both writer and reader are able to distinguish accurately between a learner's own ideas, their interpretation of the ideas and words of others, and their direct use of the ideas and words of others in their own work. 2. Academic practice and learning The University encourages its learners to demonstrate their reading and their research by making appropriate reference in their work to the ideas and words