EEvaluation Results Author: Brian Voorhees Date Evaluated: 09/09/2016 10:33:55 AM (MDT) DRF template: Technological Globalization (GR, MBT2­0512) Program: Technological Globalization (GR, MBT2­0512) Evaluation Method: Using Rubric Evaluation Summary for Technological Globalization: MBT Task 3 Final Score: Does not Meet Overall comments: 9/9/16 ­ Please confer with a course mentor before working further on this assessment. A discussion of VoIP, a chat client, and video conferencing, which would reduce costs, allow information sharing, and permit users to see one another, as well as display information, is nicely introduced. The submission engine plan, network map, languages, concerns about bias, issues affecting users, accessibility, effective communication, and technology trends aspects are insufficiently addressed. Detailed Results (Rubric used: MBT Task 3) Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics) (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. The candidate provides limited articulation of response. The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. The candidate provides substantial articulation of response. Criterion Score: 3.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ The submission effectively uses a table of content, headings, and paragraphs to organize the writing. A. Submission Engine Plan (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate does not provide a submission engine plan that addresses the concerns in the scenario. The candidate provides a submission engine plan, with no detail, that addresses the concerns in the scenario. The candidate provides a submission engine plan, with limited detail, that addresses the concerns in the scenario. The candidate provides a submission engine plan, with adequate detail, that addresses the concerns in the scenario. The candidate provides a submission engine plan, with substantial detail, that addresses the concerns in the scenario. Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ The well­organized essay provides a submission engine plan that uses distributed cloud computing, a firewall, and a web interface. Specific details for the submission engine plan that address the concerns in the scenario are not clearly evident. Please provide a detailed submission engine plan that clearly and adequately addresses each of the concerns from the scenario, including accept data from multiple sources (e.g., Internet, Twitter), organize data, make data presentable for the editing team, allow submissions to be highlighted from various parts of the world, store the data securely, make it easy for the company to back up and restore data, and provide sufficient bandwidth for people to submit ideas at all times. Printed on: 09/09/2016 01:36:43 PM (EST)A1. Network Map (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate does not provide a network map that includes the given points. The candidate provides a network map, with no detail, that includes the given points. The candidate provides a network map, with limited detail, that includes the given points. The candidate provides a network map, with adequate detail, that includes the given points. The candidate provides a network map, with substantial detail, that includes the given points. Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ The network map thoughtfully depicts an unspecified host, third city, second city, an external router, firewall, switch, and internal data server. The network map is lacking details in regard to the given points. Please provide a detailed network map that clearly and specifically addresses where the submission engine will reside, who will host and support the submission engine, and how the submission engine and its data will be protected. A2. Languages (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin. Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ The essay clearly states the submission engine plan will use Google's Translator API to allow the staff to view the company's website in their own languages. It is unclear how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin. A3. Concerns About Bias (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States. Criterion Score: 0.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ The essay discusses reducing latency and employing VoIP to allow team members to coordinate their efforts. It is unclear how technologies will be used to help alleviate concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States. A4. Issues Affecting Users (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of which The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of which The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, Printed on: 09/09/2016 01:36:43 PM (EST)technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario. technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario. which technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario. which technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario. of which technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario. Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ A discussion of purchasing virtual bandwidth from the cloud services provider to help address bandwidth issues is nicely introduced; however, the discussion of the technologies the cloud services provider would use to help address bandwidth and server lag time issues is unclear. The discussion needs to address technologies that would help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting the users specified in the scenario and align with the submission engine plan. A5. Accessibility (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees. Criterion Score: 0.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ The submission clearly discusses mechanisms for login and administration of server access, as well as states the server will be organized according to region with file access managed by an administrator. It is unclear how the CIO will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees. B. Effective Communication (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate office in Seattle. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate office in Seattle. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate office in Seattle. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate office in Seattle. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate office in Seattle. Criterion Score: 2.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ A discussion of VoIP, a chat client, and video conferencing, which would reduce costs, allow information sharing, and permit users to see one another, as well as display information, is nicely introduced. The discussion of how the partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use VoIP, an integrated chat client, video conferencing, or other key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate office in Seattle is insufficiently detailed. C. Technology Trends (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of which technology trends will support the company's mission. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of which technology trends will support the company's mission. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of which technology trends will support the company's mission. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of which technology trends will support the company's mission. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of which technology trends will support the company's mission. Printed on: 09/09/2016 01:36:43 PM (EST)Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ The submission discusses virtualization and document sharing technology trends. The discussion of the virtualization and document sharing trends' ability to support the company's mission is unclear. Please clarify the discussion of the virtualization, document sharing, or other technology trends that will support the company's mission "to provide IT instructors worldwide with direct input from industry experts and subject matter experts concerning IT standards and best practices." D. Sources (0) Unsatisfactory (1) Does Not Meet Standard (2) Minimally Competent (3) Competent (4) Highly Competent When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in­text citations and references. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in­text citations and references. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in­text citations and references with major deviations from APA style. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in­text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in­text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources. Criterion Score: 4.00 Comments on this criterion: 9/9/16 ­ The eight sources that were quoted or paraphrased were properly acknowledged. Printed on: 09/09/2016 01:36:43 PM (EST)