University of Bedfordshire Business School SHR039-6 Operations and Project Management Assignment 1 Briefing You will be required to undertake a case study and complete a case analysis report. This can be based on operations of your current workplace or any other organisation known to you. You need to discuss with your tutor to agree upon a suitable case / topic. Assessment -1: Operations Management (50%) Individual Report Submission Assessment Title Operations Management Report Unit Title Operations and Project Management Unit Code SHR039-6 Number of Credits 15 Assessment Weighting (%) 50% Issue Date 21st September 2016 Submission Deadline Thursday 20th October 2016; 11:59hours Procedure for/where to submit work (including file name format for TurnItIn where applicable) You MUST submit digital copy electronically on BREO Turn-it-in. The following file naming format should be used for submission: Assignment 1_Operations Strategy_ Student Name _Student ID Number Expected Return Date Two weeks after submission Description of Assessment Task You need to choose one global operations management case for your individual report from companies such as Samsung, Sony, Panasonic, Ikea or any company of your choice. You will discuss this further with your tutor before finalising the topic. Critical analysis of the case will help you to answer the following operations management questions: Q1. Identify three important Operation Management (OM) decision areas (e.g. quality, inventory management, layout or process design etc.) in your chosen case company. Critically analyse the present activities of the firm on the chosen OM decision areas and suggest ways to improve performance.Q2. Critically evaluate how the five performance objectives will enhance the company's competitive advantage? You will be required to undertake a case study and complete a case analysis report. This can be based on operations of your current or previous workplace or any other organisation known to you. You need to discuss and confirm with your tutor to agree upon a suitable case. The report will be 2,000 words in length (not including references and appendices). It should include answers to all the case questions (given above) and must make use of relevant unit concepts on the aspect covered. Your first submission is the final. Unit Learning Outcomes assessed: Demonstrate an in-depth knowledge and critical appreciation of Operations Management for various planning and decisions within organisations. Effectively determine how Operations Management can support the corporate strategic plan of an organisation, improve performance and implement change to achieve competitive advantage. Format MS Word Resources/Support Available Class discussion to clarify Assignment; In-class review Unit resources on BREO; Assessment Criteria See composition of marks for Assignment-1, overleaf. Details of how feedback will be provided 2Q and feedback given on-line through Turn-It-In and marked assessment criteria marking grid. Referral Assignment Your referral assignment will require you to discuss and critically analyse operations management issues and five performance objectives based on another organisation (discussed and confirmed by your tutor).Composition of Marks for Assignment-1: Assessment Criteria F (<35%) E (35-39%) D (40-49%) C (50-59%) B (60-69%) A (>=70%) Critical Analysis of 3 OM Decision Areas & Ways to Improve Performance 50% Very little or no evidence of the ability to appreciate the OM decision areas in the case.Alternatively, heavy reliance on large chunks of the case. No/very limited attempt to use evidence to support the arguments. Unfounded ways to improve performance. Some attempt is made to appreciate OM decision areas in the case. Arguments are baseless and weak. Dubious logic used to suggest ways to improve performance. Attempted to critically analyse 3 OM decision areas but lacks supporting evidence from the literature and practices of the case company. The logical link between OM areas and improved performance is satisfactory Some evidence of critical analysis of 3 OM decision areas, supported by the literature and /or OM theory. Some logical recommendations to improve performance. A good critical analysis of 3 OM decision areas in the case, supported by some evidence from the literature to support the discussion. Some sound recommendations to improve performance. Comprehensive critical analysis of 3 OM decision areas in the case, supported by strong evidence from the literature, to support the discussion. Sensible and logical, substantiated recommendations to improve performance. Critical Evaluation the 5 performance Objectives 40% Lack of critical evaluation of 5 performance objectives towards organisation competitive business advantage. The student fails to demonstrate a real understanding of any of the performance objectives. The evaluation of the of 5 performance objectives towards attaining competitive business advantage isbriefly described with limited discussion of any 3. Some evaluation of the of 5 performance objectives towards attaining competitive business advantage of the company. Less than 5 discussion is narrow and not well supported. Good evaluation of the of 5 performance objectives towards attaining good quality at competitive business advantage. About 5 discussion accurate but lacking depth & only limited evidence support. A very good evaluation of the of 5 performance objectives towards attaining good quality at competitive business advantage of the case considered. The 5 performance objectives are supported by strong evidence. A comprehensive answer that shows a sound evaluation of the of 5 performance objectives towards attaining good quality at competitive business advantage. The student demonstrates a real understanding of all 5 performance objectives in the selected company, supported by evidences & appropriate examples. Structure, presentation & Referencing 10% Poor/illogical structure. Poor report presentation, with poor grammar and readability. Referencing limited and not in Harvard format. Some structure is evident but not effective. Presentation unsatisfactory or grammar issues affecting readability. Significant errors in Harvard References Structure and presentation of the report is satisfactory. Readability is acceptable, though some grammar. Harvard reference format used correctly, referencing is limited. Good report structure and presentation. Some referencing is used to support discussion. A good logical structure is evident Presentation of the report and readability are very good. Good references are used to support the discussion. A well-structured report, where the arguments are presented in a logical order. Professional presentation with excellent readability. Wide range of high quality references to support the discussion.