High Distinction Distinction Credit pass Fail Title 2.5 Title is descriptive of the project (clearly identifies primary variables/subject/concepts) and captures the readers' interests. 2.5 Points Title is descriptive of the project (clearly identifies primary variables/subject/concepts); however, is not captivating. 2 Points Title is generally descriptive of the project (identifies primary variables/subject/concepts); however, the relationship between the variable/subject/concepts is unclear or too broadly stated. 1.5 Points Title is tangential to the project. 1.0 Points There is no title. .5 Points Project Description and significance 5 The project description describes the aims and background to the project and briefly introduces the literature to be reviewed (one of the three areas could be more developed) Impact/importance/significance of the project is very well established. 5 Points The project description very clearly describes the aims and background to the project and briefly introduces the literature to be reviewed. Impact/importance/significance of the project is generally established. 4 Points 4 Points The project description generally describes the aims and background to the project and briefly introduces the literature to be reviewed (two of the three areas could be more developed). Impact/importance/significance of the project is is not well established. 3 Points 3 Points The project description describes some but not all of the aims and background to the project and briefly introduces the literature to be reviewed (one or more of the areas are not included). Impact/importance/significance of the project is substantially underdeveloped. 2 Points There is no project description included. mpact/importance/significance of the project is not articulated. 1 Point Research Question 5 The research question(s) identifies the significant issue/problem; is interesting and feasible given the time. The research question(s) identifies the significant issue/problem; is generally interesting and feasible given the time. 4 Points The research question(s) are too broadly or too narrowly defined. 3 Points The research question is not stated as a question. 2 Points Not included. 1 Point Gnatt Chart 5 Excellent (Identifies all essential task/activities; realistically schedules these task and activities). 5 Points Superior (Identifies all essential task/activities; unrealistically schedules these task and activities). 4 Points Above average (Identifies most of the essential task/activities; realistically schedules these task and activities). 3 Points Credit--Below average (Identifies most task/activities; unrealistically schedules these task and activities). 2 Points Below average (Identifies most task/activities; unrealistically schedules these task and activities). 1 Point Written Communication 2.5 Excellent--no grammatical errors and a clear structure. 2.5 Points Superior- some errors and a basic structure (clear introductory, body and concluding paragraphs). 2 Point Average--some grammatical errors and a basic structure (not followed in terms of introductory, body and concluding paragraphs). 1.5 Below average--many errors and a poor structure (no clear paragraph structure). 1.0 Points Fail--Incomprehensible. .5 Points Jigar R Patel - S0155435 Jagruti Patel – S0274894 Proposed Title The title and topic is good but it is broad and needs to be clearly offered and aligned to the project . It is less than 15 words which is effective. The topic is interesting and relevant. Score 2.5 Project Description The project description offers some theoretical definition and covers some of the available literature, there needs to be more – you suggest there is a lot however only have a scant number of refs . This is a useful way of clearly defining the main topic of the report. The is a lot of work in media richness so you need to tie it down and find a perspective – find your key words and search on them The description then proceeds with relevant information to the topic but required literature integration. The discussion offers some background to the report and covers some research. I would suggest to continue your search for relevant literature and review it in more depth to integrate into the discussion of your report. There is a substantial amount of literature in this topic area so search more widely. The Significance The significance of the project would benefit from some greater depth of discussion and justification from some of the sources suggested above. In your next paper, you will need to show that 'not many studies address this problem and also use practical data and justification. '. Score 3.5 The Research Questions You have stated the research questions clearly AND articulated questions. Ensure you research questions are clearly structured and emerge from the literature. They need to relate to the literature and show relevance Score 3 The Gantt Chart The Gantt chart offered a simple time line , it is not detailed and needs to offer the actual project timelines . This is a useful tool to keep you on track and is an important skill to develop. Needs work . Score 3 Written Communication The introductory paragraph outlined the parts of the report. This provides a basic overview of the information to be discussed. As you rewrite the introduction can you think about how you can capture the reader's interest advancing the discussion on significance using figures and statistics from practical secondary sources. Over all I think that you need to work on the structure of your paragraphs improve formatting to make the reading of the assignment more fluid. You require more integration of literature however overall the assignment was sound and read well. 2 Total 14