Assignment title: Information
ZOO STUDY REPORT
ASSIGNMENT 2
DUE DATE: Monday 31st October, 2016 (5pm)
LENGTH: Word count of 2000 (see word limit penalty below)
WEIGHTING: 45%
YOU MUST SUBMIT YOUR ASSIGNMENT USING Learnonline
WORD LIMIT PENALTY:
The word limit for this assignment is 2000 words with a maximum of 2200 words. Marks will be
deducted from papers exceeding this limit based on the percentage by which the limit is exceeded,
with 1% deducted for every 1% over the limit. For example, a 2400 word paper is 10% over the limit
and would have 10% deducted from the total marks possible for this assignment.
EXTENSION REQUESTS:
Requests for extensions must be submitted at least three days prior to the assignment due date. All
applications for extensions must be made via the Extension request link on the course Learnonline
page and include supporting documentation (eg medical certificate, letter from counsellor). Students
will be notified (via Learnonline) whether or not the extension has been granted (and the new
submission date where appropriate).
An assignment handed in after the due date for which an extension has not been granted will lose 5%
per working day. Assignments will not normally be accepted once marked assignments have been
returned to the class (and if accepted will receive a maximum mark of 50%).
THIS ASSIGNMENT IS LINKED TO ASSIGNMENT 1 & THE ADELAIDE ZOO VISIT
This assignment builds on from your first assignment and the zoo practical visit. You will need to
use the feedback from Assessment 1 (zoo project proposal), combined with the information you
obtained from your visit to the Adelaide Zoo, to finalise your Assessment 2 (zoo practical report)
that has a more extensive literature review followed by a methodologically sound project proposal.
The focus species should be the same as the one chosen for your first assignment – unless you have
had to change it (e.g. animals of your chosen species are no longer housed at the Adelaide Zoo).
You will not collect or analyse data from Adelaide Zoo, as this would require ethics approval
and is beyond the scope of this course.
BIOLOGICAL & LEARNING
PSYCHOLOGY
(BEHL 2012), 2016
ASSIGNMENT 2
INSTRUCTIONS
Dr CARLA LITCHFIELDSince there are no results to discuss, this report does not include a results or discussion section.
Instead, you are expected to EXPAND ASSIGNMENT 1:
Especially the INTRODUCTION (you only covered a brief background and now must cite
at least 6 peer-reviewed journal articles or books or reliable reports also suitable, e.g. from
relevant IUCN specialist groups)
And METHOD section (you only covered this briefly and now must cite a similar study).
And describe improvements/changes to your original Study Design Proposal (Assignment 1)
based on marker feedback and visit to Adelaide Zoo.
Remember, the project proposed must be:
ETHICAL (i.e. do no physical or psychological harm to human or non-human participants).
A project that could potentially create suffering in animals or be upsetting to zoo visitors
would not get ethics committee approval.
PRACTICAL or 'doable' and theoretically could be undertaken as a "real-world" research
project within a 6-month timeframe (e.g. for an Honours research project). A zoo would be
unable to build special enclosures or make major changes in husbandry/routine for a research
project. Your enrichment idea should be one that is cheap, safe for animals to use, easy for
keepers or other staff to keep clean or fill with food.
THINGS TO COVER IN YOUR WRITE-UP
TITLE (1 mark):
You can use the title from your Assignment 1- but the 'improved' version by taking into
account any feedback for suggested changes.
INTRODUCTION (14 marks): you must cite relevant literature in this section (at least 6
References- peer-reviewed journal articles, books, or reliable reports also are suitable, e.g. from
relevant IUCN specialist groups), of these 6 at least 2 references must be about your species.
Some useful references are available at the end of this document or in the instructions for
Assignment 1. Use proper prose/paragraphs NOT dot points or numbered sections.
Your proposed study should follow an ABA design, that is, it will consist of a period of baseline
observation of the animal's behaviour (A), followed by an enrichment intervention (B), followed by
a period of post-intervention observation of the animal's behaviour (A). This is usually the best way
to test the effect of an intervention such as enrichment, on an animal's behaviour and enclosure use.
1. Start your introduction with your one or two aim(s) (2 marks).
2. Then provide your background review of the literature for environmental enrichment for the
species you are covering in your zoo project (10 marks). This section will be the longest part of
your report. This section should be structured in continuous prose/paragraphs, however you are
expected to cover the following points:
Describe the natural habitat or environment (i.e. the 'wild') for your chosen species (refer
to literature).
Describe behaviour and life in the wild for your species (e.g., distribution, habitat, diet,
daily activity pattern, daily distance travelled, size of home range, group composition and
social structure, typical behaviours etc- refer to literature).
Define 'psychological wellbeing' in captive animals (refer to literature). Define enrichment and give some examples which are appropriate for your species. If your
readings do not provide examples of enrichment techniques used for your species, then refer
to examples used for other similar species (refer to literature).
Define stereotypic behaviour and give an example, and refer to a study/literature that has
investigated it in your species or another similar species.
Define an activity/time budget, and refer to a study/literature that provides information for
your species (e.g. activity budget in "wild" or another zoo; refer to literature).
Define an 'ABA' research design. ABA designs are typical in animal behaviour research, but
are sometimes also referred to by other names such as pre/post studies. A good description of
an ABA design can be found in an article by Saudargas and Drummer (1996) – see resources
list at end of document, and feel free to locate different resources as well.
You can build on the background from your Assignment 1- but the 'improved' version by
taking into account any feedback for suggested changes.
3. Finish the introduction with the specific hypothesis of your study. The hypothesis may entail
predictions about what you expect the findings to be in terms of changes in the animals'
behaviour or enclosure use. You can use the research question(s) or hypothesis from your
Assignment 1- but the 'improved' version by taking into account any feedback for
suggested changes (2 marks).
METHOD (16 marks)
You must cite at least one study similar to yours in this section (use proper prose/ paragraphs NOT
dot points or numbered sections).
Design (2 marks):
Cite at least one study similar to yours as an example. Describe your ABA design, including a
description of the intervention (B). You can use the design from your Assignment 1- but the
'improved' version by taking into account any feedback for suggested changes.
Participants (2 marks):
Describe the characteristics of the species you chose in Assignment 1. You can use the
participants from your Assignment 1- but the 'improved' version by taking into account
any feedback for suggested changes.
Materials/Measures (10 marks):
Give specific details about the apparatus or materials you will need for your proposed study. Cite
at least one study which uses similar materials (e.g. an ABA design).
These must FIT ON ONE PAGE (i.e. map & enrichment idea)
(1) Provide a diagram or map of your enclosure (based on your visit to Adelaide Zoo),
correctly labelled as Figure 1 underneath. For example:
Figure 1: Map and dimensions of the flamingo enclosure at Adelaide Zoo (not to scale).
Include the key features of the enclosure. It does not have to be to scale or the perfect
shape, but it should be roughly accurate. Provide an estimate of its length and depth. On thissketch, include the main features of the enclosure, or 'furniture', such as climbing structures,
mounds, objects, rocks, and trees. Also include water features if you can see them. If there
are large climbing structures, estimate their height. On your drawing, note down where the
zoo visitor viewing areas are, and where the doors/gates are that lead to 'off-exhibit' areas.
(2) Describe your enrichment object(s), device or technique for your proposed study for your
species at Adelaide Zoo and where you would locate it/them and how many you would need
in the enclosure. If you provide a drawing or sketch of your idea, please label it correctly as
Figure 1 (below the actual diagram or figure). Make sure that you acknowledge the source of
the idea (e.g. from a website or published study) and how you would make sure that it is safe
for animals to use and easy for zoo staff to maintain. You can use the materials/measures
from your Assignment 1- but the 'improved' version by taking into account any
feedback for suggested changes. BUT, now you must provide the diagrams based on
your visit to Adelaide Zoo and Enrichment idea ON ONE PAGE.
Procedure (2 marks):
Describe the procedure of your study – but remember, you won't actually be collecting
data, so this is simply a description of how you WOULD do it. You can use the
procedure from your Assignment 1- but the 'improved' version by taking into account
any feedback for suggested changes.
DATA ANALYSIS (4 marks): you must cite at least one study similar to yours (with similar data
analysis methods) in this section as well as one statistics book/reference if needed. Use proper
prose/paragraphs NOT dot points or numbered sections.
Describe which type of data analysis is appropriate for your proposed study (e.g. descriptive
statistics and graphs/tables; statistical tests- such as, t-tests, analyses of variance, correlations;
type of qualitative analysis and interpretation of data).
If you are using descriptive statistics only (e.g. means, standard deviations,
frequencies, proportions, percentages), explain why this is appropriate (e.g. single
subject or small sample size)
If you are using inferential statistics describe whether the appropriate tests are
parametric or non-parametric
You can use the data analysis from your Assignment 1- but the 'improved' version by
taking into account any feedback for suggested changes
REFERENCES (4 marks): APA style
Provide names of all authors cited in your introduction/report. Cite correctly in text
Names in alphabetical order
Publication details of books or articles which were primary sources of references used (i.e.,
do not include sources you did not read yourself)
Only include references cited in your report (i.e., it is not a bibliography)
Titles of books and journals (and volume) in italics
The introduction needs 4-5 references (from those available as E-readers) & 2 references about
your species (1 must be from the IUCN Red List). The methods section needs 1 similar study
reference. The results section needs 1 similar study reference & 1 statistics reference. TOTAL:
at least 8-9 referencesGRAMMAR/STRUCTURE (2 marks)
Make sure that your prose is grammatically correct, and that it is easy to understand and divided into
appropriate sections.
IMPROVEMENTS/CHANGES MADE (4 marks)
Describe improvements or changes you made to your Study Design Proposal based on (1) feedback
from marker and (2) your visit to Adelaide Zoo.
Marking criteria Marks
Title /1
Introduction
- Aim
- Background/ literature review
- Hypothesis
/2
/10
/2
Method
- Design /2
- Participants /2
- Measures/materials /10
- Procedure /2
Data analysis /4
References /4
Spelling/grammar
Improvements/changes based on feedback
/2
/4
Total 45 marks