TMGT60031 Marking Guide Assignment Two 20% overall assessment value Individual Presentation 1. Presentation and effectiveness of communication (4 marks) Structure, style, grammar, fluency and effective communication of issues, findings and conclusions. Relevant use and formatting of references according to Swinburne's Harvard system. It is assumed that at post graduate level the presentation will be of a standard commonly expected in the academic world. Simply copying (even with references cited) or simply paraphrasing sections of text from a variety of articles without adding your own coherent discussion/and or analysis does not support the communication of professional/academic knowledge in a submission or report. F P C D HD 2. Understanding (4 marks) Demonstrated understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the analysis of the industry and/or organisation. This means that your research effort will result in sufficient information for you to write a overview of the framework/theory, but then allow you apply the framework/theory to the organisational situation. General discussion loosely related to the concepts and issues under consideration will not demonstrate your understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the specific assessment task. F P C D HD 3. Scholarship (4 marks) Evidence of ability to research, analyse and critically evaluate materials relevant to the task; academically rigorous use of supporting references; appropriate use of supporting course content. Scholarship includes being able to locate academically rigorous literature, decide which is relevant to the topic under consideration and coherently discuss, the academic literature. Further, it is necessary to provide evidence of your ability to research, analyse and critically evaluate the materials you have determined as relevant to the industry and/or organisation, and which also specifically address the requirements of the assignment. Wider reading is required. Simply using the academic references in the course material will not be considered as sufficiently scholarly for this section. F P C D HD   4. Effectiveness of responses to task requirements (8 marks) This includes addressing each of the specific topic areas/ issues/ concepts required by the assessment task. The student needs to identify the specific issues relevant to task requirements, undertake relevant research to determine the specific concepts and issues in the literature, and then link these back to the assessment task. Finally, an engaging and interactive presentation was provided that was well led generating stimulating and thoughtful discussion from the class.( worth 5 marks of the 8) If this is not evident, then the assignment will not be considered as adhering to assessment task requirements. F P C D HD Total Marks: Percentage: Instruction F P C D HD Mark From the assigned framework covered in the weekly readings show how this framework can be used to gain insights into management behaviour within an organisation of your choice Little demonstrated understanding of academic framework or how to apply it. Little to no discussion generated. Over time Limited definitions, analysis and understanding demonstrated of chosen academic framework and its application. Little discussion generated. Over time Reasonably clear definition and explanation of chosen academic framework. Strong evidence of some critical analysis of chosen organisation using framework. Minor errors in understanding and interpretation. Interesting questions Clear definition and explanation of chosen academic framework. Strong critical analysis of chosen organisation showing considerable research and thought as a result of appropriate application of the chosen framework. Generation of stimulating discussion. Expert and thorough critical analysis of chosen organisation using appropriately defined, well supported and appropriately used academic framework. Generation of stimulating and thoughtful discussion. TOTAL MARK OUT OF 20 COMMENTS