School of Computer of Science ASSIGNMENT BRIEFING SHEET (2015/16 Academic Year) – ANONYMOUS MARKING Assignment Title Progress Report 2 Date Submitted Module Title E-learning Applications Design & Development Module Code 6WCM0009 / 6WCM0010 Tutor Dr Mariana Lilley GROUP or INDIVIDUAL Assignment Individual FOR INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENTS – STUDENT TO COMPLETE By completing BOX A below, I certify that the submitted work is entirely mine and that any material derived or quoted from the published or unpublished work of other persons has been duly acknowledged. [ref. UPR AS12, section 7 and UPR AS14 (Appendix III)]. Please ONLY provide your ID (srn) number as this assignment will be anonymously marked BOX A Student ID Number (SRN) School of Computer of Science ASSIGNMENT BRIEFING SHEET (2015/16 Academic Year) – ANONYMOUS MARKING THE ASSIGNMENT TASK: As part of this task, you are required to report on and reflect upon your project progress to date. MODULE LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSED BY THIS ASSIGNMENT: Knowledge and Understanding. Successful students will typically have a knowledge and understanding of: 1. main principles relating to the design, implementation and evaluation of e-learning applications; 2. appropriate set of criteria to evaluate their own work and the work of others. Learning Outcomes: Skills and Attributes. Successful students will typically be able to: 3. identify and define a substantial practical task in the e-learning domain, and address this task through the application of a broad range of Computer Science techniques and methodologies; 4. plan and conduct a programme of practical work in the domain of e-learning that draws on knowledge from a broad range of Computer Science subjects; 5. work autonomously with minimal supervision, and within agreed guidelines and deadlines; document, report on and critically evaluate their work in a manner appropriate to the needs of a specified readership. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: This assignment is to be submitted and marked anonymously. Students should ONLY use their student ID number to identify themselves on their work. Work submitted via StudyNet for anonymous marking will automatically have an anonymity number allocated to it. You are required to submit your report as ONE .docx file. Your report should not exceed 2,500 words (excluding references). FEEDBACK FROM THIS ASSIGNMENT The feedback will take the form of a score out of 5 and comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the work. The feedback will be made available via Studynet. MARKS AWARDED FOR: Please see attached. DEADLINES AND ASSIGNMENT WEIGHTINGS 1 This assignment is worth 10% of the overall assessment for this module. 2 You are expected to spend about 15 Hours to complete this assignment to a satisfactory standard 3 Date assignment set 31 May 2016 Date completed assignment to be handed in 11 July 2016 4 Target date for return of marked assignment 8 August 2016 INTERNAL MODERATION This assignment has been internally moderated. I confirm that the assignment set, meets the requirements of the module and that the brief provides appropriate content for students to successfully complete the assignment. Moderator name, signature and date   Progress Report 2 This assignment is worth 10% of your final grade for this module. Please note that this assignment will be marked anonymously. Your report should not exceed 2,500 words (excluding references). Your report must include two sections, listed below: 1. An account of how findings from the literature impacted on the direction of the work; 2. A walkthrough of the practical implementation carried out so far (with relevant screenshots). This section can take the form of a small set of scenarios. Please submit your report as a .docx, .doc or .rtf document. The Please refer to the recording of the Adobe Connect session "Progress Reports Explained" for further details. Marking Scheme Section Marks available Background research 0 None 1 Poor (1-2 relevant sources, limited integration of literature into work) 2 Good (2-3 relevant sources, satisfactory integration of literature into work) 3 Very good (3-4 relevant sources, very good integration of literature into work) 4 Excellent (4-5 relevant sources, excellent integration of literature into work) 5 Outstanding (5+ relevant sources, integration of literature into work is thorough and pedagogically sound) Walkthrough of practical implementation 0 None 1 Poor (1 scenario) 2 Good (1-2 relevant scenarios presented) 3 Very good (2-3 relevant and clearly distinct scenarios presented) 4 Excellent (3-4 relevant and clearly distinct scenarios presented) 5 Outstanding (4+ relevant and clearly distinct scenarios presented; detail at interface level is outstanding)