Marking criteria for the Report 1 for CIS8011 Student Name: Student #: Marking criteria Mark Awarded ACTIVITIES 1. The report should be well structured and cover at least the following topics: - Structure o Executive Summary o Market Analysis o Digital Innovation and Trends o Value Proposition o Recommendations o Conclusion - References o 20 References at least o Relevant citations within the report 1: Poor (poor structure, grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 4 points) 2: Average (minimal structure, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (5 – 6 points) 3: Good (good structure, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (7 – 8 points) 4: Excellent (great structure, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (9 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: /10 2. Market analysis. 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 10 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (11 – 14 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (15 – 25 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (26 – 30 points) Marker Feedback: /30 3. Digital innovation, trends and justifications relevant to the problem statements 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 10 points) /302: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (11 – 14 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (15 – 25 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (26 – 30 points) Marker Feedback: 4. Value propositions of digital innovation in relations to the problem statements. 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 5 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (5 – 10 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (11 – 15 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (16 – 20 points) Marker Feedback: /20 5. Quality and relevance of Conclusion(s)/recommendations 1: Poor (poor conclusion and recommendations, grammar and spelling mistakes) (0- 4 points) 2: Average (weak conclusion and recommendations, grammar and spelling mistakes) (5 – 6 points) 3: Good (good conclusion, no grammar and spelling mistakes, acceptable expression) (7 – 8 points) 4: Excellent (great conclusion, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors) (9 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: /10 6. Less late submission as per USQ/BELA policies and procedures Total /100 OVERALL COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________