Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 ('Act'). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment Information Subject Code: GB601 Subject Name: MBA Capstone Assessment Title: Assessment 2 - Performance Evaluation Weighting: 15% Total Marks: 15 Length: 1,500 words Due Date: Week 6 (via turnitin, Monday 19th December at 11.55pm) . Assessment Description By now you should be familiar with the business simulation and have made two quarters decisions. This assessment requires you to demonstrate an understanding of the performance of your company and undertake a self- evaluation of decisions made. Using your balanced scorecard, write a brief report to the venture capitalists (lecturer) that addresses the following; a) Your company performance to date. (500 words) b) A reflection on the decisions (good/bad) you have made. (500 words) c) A summary of your learnings to date of running a business. (500 words) You are required to include a copy of your quarter 2, balanced scorecard in your report. However, you are not required to add huge amounts of appendices or charts from the simulation. You are encouraged to research and use appropriate references in regards to learning styles and reflection. A copy of the marking rubrics is attached. Academic referencing standards must be adhered to in citing others work and/or applying strategic frameworks. You must stick to the 1,500 word limit =/- 10% otherwise marks will be deducted.COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 ('Act'). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment Marking Rubric Criteria HD (High Distinction) DN (Distinction) 75% - 84% CR (Credit) 74% - 65% P (Pass) 50% - 64% NN (Fail) 0% - 49% Score 90% – 100% 85% - 89% Company performanc e to date Thorough, logical, analytical, and accurate description of performance to date Thorough, logical, and accurate description of performance to date Thorough and accurate description of performance to date Thorough, and in the main accurate description of performance to date Inaccurate and incomplete description of performance to date /25 Reflection on decisions Extremely clearly stated decisions (good/bad) with articulately demostrated reflections Clearly stated decisions (good/bad) with well demostrated reflections Well stated decisions (good/bad) with good demostrated reflections Well stated decisions (good/bad) with some demostrated reflections Limited stated decisions and less than satisfactory reflections /25 Summary of learnings Extremely clearly stated and articulates learnings. Clearly stated learnings Well stated learnings Satisfactory learnings Limited stated learnings /25 Use of examples from the balanced scorecard Provides detailed and highly relevant numeric examples that clearly illustrate key points. Provides detailed and relevant numericexamples that clearly illustrate key points. Provides relevant numeric examples that clearly illustrate key points. Providesnumeric examples that illustrate key points. Fails to provide numeric examples. Examples are irrelevant. /15 Adhere to academic referencing conventions and acknowledge sources. Uses report format Writing style is clear; logical flow and structure; Fluent use of discipline-specific academic language. No spelling or grammatical errors. Acknowledged all sources in text and in reference list. All references in correct format. Uses report format Writing style is clear; Mostly logical flow and structure; Correct use of disciplinespecific academic language. Some minor spelling or grammatical errors. Acknowledged all sources in text and in reference list. All references in correct format. Uses report format Writing style is mostly clear; Generally logical flow and structure; Mostly written in discipline specific academic language; Some spelling or grammatical errors. Acknowledged most sources in text and reference list. Most references in correct Some references in correct format. in text and reference list. Uses report format Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure; some use of discipline-specific academic language. Spelling or grammatical errors. Acknowledged most sources In text and reference list. Some references in correct format. Does not use report format Writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure; numerous spelling grammatical errors. Several sources are unacknowledged. Major errors in format of references. /10 Comments: Total Assignment Mark/Grade: /15 /100