COURSE MATERIALS: Pojman, Louis P., Ethical Theory: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Sixth Edition, Wadsworth, 2011, ISBN-10: 0-495-80877-6. VI. Kantian & Deontological Systems Read pages 277-318 VI. Kantian & Deontological Systems Read pages 319-327, 339-362 VII. Contractarian Systems EASTER Read pages 363-379 NO CLASSES MARCH 24-28, 2016 VII. Contractarian Systems Read pages 380-398 VIII. Virtue-Based Systems Read pages. 399-439 VIII. Virtue-Based Systems Read pages 442- 492 VIII. Virtue-Based Systems Read pages 442- 4921. What has been the most frequent criticism of Jeremy's Bentham's conception of Utilitarianism?2. Regarding the Jeremy Bentham question above, What modifications did John Stuart Mill apply to Bentham's conception?3. What is the theory of negative responsibility? How does it relate to Utilitarianism?4. Imagine that you are the head of the Center for Disease Control, or CDC, and one of your departments has just developed 100 doses of a vaccine for the Ebola virus. Just at this time, a small breakout of Ebola has emerged in Sapelo Sound, Georgia, a small town of just over 100 residents, and you immediately promise their mayor all the doses of the new vaccine. However, just after you get off the phone with her honor from Sapelo Sound, you receive an emergency fax from WHO (the U.N.'s World Health Organization) notifying you of a massive Ebola outbreak that is just emerging Mombasa, Kenya. Officials at WHO have been keeping up with CDC's Ebola research, and have readied all their laboratories to mass-produce the 1,000,000 doses necessary to blunt the very probable Kenyan epidemic, and all-too-likely African pandemic. The trick is, the WHO will need all 100 doses of your Ebola vaccine now, in order to meet this crisis. Question: Under the above circumstances, how would you respond as an RU, or Rule-Utilitarian, and why? Now, under the same circumstances, how would you solve this problem as an AU, or Act Utilitarian, and why? Is your answer as an RU different from your answer as an AU? Why or why not?