V.01 12/2016 Rubrics for Senior Graduation Project one Unacceptable Needs a lot Improvement Needs some improvements Acceptable Meets Expectation Total Marks Literature review There is no existing work relevant to problem domain is described. (0 Mark) Partial description of one existing work relevant to problem domain is given in the report. (1.5 Marks) A complete description of only one existing work relevant to problem domain is given in the report. (3 Marks) Two Or more existing works relevant to the problem domain are partially described in the report. The references to the existing works given are in correct format. (4 Marks) A complete description of three or more existing works related to the problem domain are given in the report with accurate references. (5 Marks) Problem statement/scope Problem statement does not define a valid problem. Scope of the project is not given in the report. (0 Mark) Problem statement defines a problem but does not highlight its complexities and challenges. Scope of the project is not defined. (1.5 Marks) Problem statement defines the problem clearly. However, scope of the project is incorrect OR inconsistent. (3 Marks) Problem is clearly defined, including the complexities and intricacies involved in problem domain. Scope of the project is correct but partially defined. (4 Marks) Problem is clearly defined and explains the underlying challenges and complexities. The Scope of the project is clearly defined, including the risk assessment. (5 Marks) Rational for choosing the methodology Report does not narrate the development methodology suitable for solving the problem. (0 Marks) Report narrates a development methodology without giving a rational for selection of methodology. (1.5 Marks) Report narrates a development methodology but gives a partially correct rational. The reports does not mention alternatives. Report narrates a development methodology and gives a valid reason for the selection of methodology. (4 Marks) Report narrates a development methodology as a suitable approach to solve the problem. The methodology is compared with different alternatives and a clear rational is given for the suitability of the selected methodology. (5 Marks) Project requirement specification The requirements associated with the The requirements associated with the The requirements associated with the The requirements associated with the The requirements associated with theV.01 12/2016 project are not specified at all. (0 Mark) project are not enough specified. Three functional requirements or less (3 Marks) project are specified but need some improvement. Three functional and two non- functional requirements (5 Marks) project are specified as clearly as possible. Seven functional and Three nonfunctional requirements (10 Marks) project are specified clearly and properly. Eleven functional and Four non- functional requirements (15 Marks) Project plan & Project management No evidence of planning (0 Marks) Little project planning. Gantt chart available but WBS is missing (6 Marks) Basic planning and time management needs necessary for project completion met. . Gantt chart available but resources are missing (12 Marks) Utilize resources in completion of tasks; Appraise efficiency and effectiveness in completion of task in meeting goals and Critical path is highlighted (16 Marks) Exhibits a professional level of planning and time management and complete Gantt chart (20 Marks) Detailed analysis The report does not contain any deliverable analysis that will guide the work during the rest of the project (0 Mark) The report does not contain enough deliverable analysis that will guide the work during the rest of the project. Report Contains ER diagram. However, there are no Use-Case and class diagrams given in the report. (2 Marks) The report contains a certain analysis that will guide the work during the rest of the project. But some points need improvement. Report contains ER diagram, a use- case diagram with description of each usecase. There is no class diagram given in the report. (6 Marks) The report contains a professional and complete analysis that will guide the work during the rest of the project but some elements need to be detailed. The report contains ER diagram, Usecase diagram and description of each use-case is given proper. A class diagram is given however, the relationship between classes are not refined. (8 Marks) The report contains a professional and complete analysis that will guide the work during the rest of the project. The report contains ER diagram, Use-case diagram and description of each use-case. A complete class diagram is given in the report. (10 Marks)V.01 12/2016 Initial design The idea of the project is not explored nor elaborated (0 Mark) The idea of the project is not enough explored and not elaborated. The report contains relational schema of the ER diagram given in "Detailed Analysis". There is no Sequence diagram given in the report. (2 Marks) The idea of the project is explored and elaborated but some points need improvement. The report contains a correct relational schema. Sequence diagrams for two usecases are given in the report. (6 Marks) The idea of the project is clearly explored and elaborated but some attributes need to be detailed. The report contains a correct relational schema. Sequence diagrams for four use-cases are given correctly in the report. (8 Marks) The idea of the project is clearly explored and elaborated. The report contains a correct relational schema. Sequence diagrams for all use-cases are given correctly. (10 Marks) Presentation The student did not show up at all for the presentation (0 Marks) Only TWO points are only fulfilled from the points mentioned in the last column (4 Marks) Only THREE points are only fulfilled from the points mentioned in the last column (6 Marks) Only FOUR points are only fulfilled from the points mentioned in the last column (8 Marks)  Confidence  Eye Contact  Clarity of presentation  Ability of organizing and presenting information accurately  Ability of drawing relevant and useful conclusions (10 Marks) Involvement in Project activities. Was generally unreliable in completing work activities; did not follow instructions and procedures promptly or accurately; was careless, and work needed constant followup; required close supervision (0 Marks) Was Partial follow instructions and procedures promptly or accurately to complete the work (3 Marks) Was generally reliable in completing activities; normally followed instructions and procedures; was usually attentive to detail, but work had to be reviewed occasionally; (6 Marks) Was generally reliable in completing activities; normally followed instructions and procedures; was usually attentive to detail, but work had to be reviewed. (8 Marks) Was consistently reliable in completing work activities; always followed instructions and procedures well; was careful and extremely attentive to detail; required little or minimum supervision (10 Marks)V.01 12/2016 Submission of draft chapters of the report The supervisor can allocated the marks based on : 1. Submission of Project Initiation Report (2 Marks) 2. Introduction (2 Marks) 3. Literature Review & Feasibility Analysis (3 Marks) 4. Methodology (3 Marks)