QSO 645 Stakeholder Register Journal Guidelines and Rubric Read the "Greyson Corporation" case study on page 247 of your Project Management Case Studies text. STEP 1: Identify Stakeholders Action: List all the groups and individuals who have a stake in this case study. STEP 2: Stakeholder Requirements Action: Develop a stakeholder register. You can use the one on page 532 of your PMP Exam Prep text. There is no right or wrong version of the register. The goal is to capture the stakeholders, document the stakeholder requirements, understand the degree of influence they have on outcomes, and classify each as a positive, negative, or neutral party. Journals are private between the student and the instructor. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply what you learn each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on your educational and professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you the opportunity to further develop these skills. For more information about Blackboard blogs and journals, review these tutorials. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.Rubric Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Stakeholder Register Entry clearly describes the stakeholder register with specific relevant examples Entry describes the stakeholder register with examples Entry describes most of the elements of the stakeholder register Entry does not show evidence of understanding the stakeholder register 25 Synthesis Entry shows excellent evidence of synthesis of the module content and exhibits careful consideration of the topic Entry shows good application of the module content and demonstrates that the student has read the module content Entry shows limited application, indicating the student may have reviewed the module content but needs to explore further Entry does not address the journal prompts and reflects that the student has not read the module content 25 Voice Entry is written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience and a consistent voice is evident throughout Entry is written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice Entry is written in a style that considers the audience, but the author's voice is not consistent and is difficult to identify Entry does not attempt to use a style that considers audience and there is no evidence of author voice 25 Writing Entry is free of errors in organization and grammar Errors of organization and grammar are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow Errors of organization and grammar are limited enough so that entries can be understood Errors of organization and grammar make the entry difficult to understand 25 Total 100%