IBU5HRM: Assessment 1 marking rubric STUDENT NAME: CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Fair (50 – 59%) Poor (<50%) MARK Introduction (10% of total mark) ☐ Excellent outline of purpose, scope and limitations; The case study and context explained at an advanced level. Excellent understanding of the organisation. Outstanding organisation/order of each section of the report. (8-10 marks) ☐ Clear and purposeful outline of purpose, scope and limitations; The case study context well developed and understandings of the context described very well. Clear and concise organisation/order of each section of the report. (7 marks) ☐ Clear and concise purpose, scope and limitations; Developed description of the case study and understanding of the context of the organisation – case study in the international arena. Succinct organisation/order of each section of the report. (6 marks) ☐ Basic understanding of purpose, scope and limitations; Basic outline of case study and understanding of the context of the organisation – case study in the international arena. Reasonable organisation/order of each section of the report. (5 marks) ☐ No clear purpose, scope or limitations or identification of the case study; No clear understanding of the context of the organisation – case study. No mention of the international environment. No organisation/order of each section of the report. (< 5 marks) /10 Organisational HRM, Diversity Management and Culture (20% of total mark) ☐ Report outlines the organisational context to an excellent level; HRM, Diversity Management and Culture evaluated to a very high standard. High level of interpretative and analytical ability to critically analyse literature. (16-20 marks) ☐ Clear and concise description of the organisational context and ideas well evaluated on the HRM, Diversity Management and Culture; Evidence of comprehensive critical analysis. (14-15 marks) ☐ Ability to conceptualise and describe the organisational and basically evaluate the HRM, Diversity Management and Culture; Evidence of critical analysis. (12-13 marks) ☐ Basic ideas formulated to link to the organisational context, HRM, Diversity Management and Culture; Fundamental theories and concepts summarised. Simple analysis of the literature. (10-11 marks) ☐ No evidence of understanding or evaluating the organisational context, HRM, Diversity Management or Culture relative to the case study; No summary of main theories and concepts; No critical analysis of the literature. (<10 marks) /20 International Performance Management, Training and Development (40% of total mark) ☐ Demonstrates outstanding ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. High level of interpretative and analytical ability to critically analyse literature. (32-40 marks) ☐ Demonstrates thoroughly consistent ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development Evidence of comprehensive critical analysis. (28-31 marks) ☐ Demonstrates consistent ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. Evidence of critical analysis. (24-27 marks) ☐ Demonstrates basic ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. Displays basic information. Simple analysis of the literature. (20-23 marks) ☐ No demonstrated ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. No critical analysis of the literature. (<20 marks) /40Conclusion and Recommendation/s/ Solution/s (10% of total mark) ☐ An insightful and comprehensive summary of the report; Outstanding capacity to make recommendations for effective HRM, Culture, Performance Management, Training and Development; Excellent appendices. (8-10 marks) ☐ Ability to make sound evaluation of the report; Good ability to make sound recommendations HRM, Culture, Performance Management, Training and Development; Welldeveloped appendices. (7 marks) ☐ Above average ability to summarise the report; Sound recommendations related to HRM, Culture, Performance Management, Training and Development; Above average appendices. (6 marks) ☐ Reasonably clear summary of the report; Recommendations link well to HRM, Culture, Performance Management, Training and Development .Minimum appendices. (5 marks) ☐ Conclusion does not summarise the report; No clear recommendations or solutions – not linked to HRM, Culture, Performance Management, Training and Development; No appendices. (< 5 marks) /10 Research and Referencing (10% of total mark) ☐ Evidence of extensive reading and research; Relevant literature used critically and analytically, presenting a balance of perspectives Excellent application of referencing throughout the document and the reference List. (8-10 marks) ☐ Evidence of wide reading and research; Evidence of critical and analytical use of relevant literature; Good application of referencing throughout the document and the reference list. (7 marks) ☐ Reading and research beyond set minimum. Use of relevant research to support findings; Reasonable application of referencing throughout the document and the reference list. (6 marks) ☐ Minimal reading and research – basic 15 contemporary (beyond 2006) refereed journal articles; Limited use of relevant research, demonstrating little engagement with literature; Average and sometimes inconsistent application of referencing with some errors throughout the document and the reference list. (5 marks) ☐ Inadequate reading and research – less than 15 contemporary (beyond 2006) refereed journal articles; Research is evident but is inappropriate or irrelevant; Numerous referencing errors throughout the document and the reference list. (< 5 marks) /10 Essay Format, Clarity, Presentation and Proof-reading (10% of total mark) ☐ Outstanding presentation thoroughly consistent with high standards in writing academic style; Excellent headings that highlight the case study; High facility with academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Comprehensively accurate grammar, punctuation and spelling. (8-10 marks) ☐ Presentation thoroughly consistent with academic style; Excellent headings Consistent application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Very accurate grammar, punctuation and spelling. (7 marks) ☐ Presentation consistent with academic style; Good headings; Good application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Generally, good grammar, punctuation and spelling. (6 marks) ☐ Presentation adequate, but not fully consistent with appropriate academic style; Adequate headings; Adequate application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Some errors in grammar, punctuation and/or spelling. (5 marks) ☐ No structure; No headings; Inadequate application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Unacceptable level of grammar, punctuation and or spelling. (< 5 marks) /10 Examiner: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: TOTAL MARK /100 5