world limit 1250 words(Coles) This is a follow up from Assignment 1. The CTO officer has approved your business case document and they have now asked you to provide a professional report on the “Strategic Planning” aspects of the project. “First read assignment1 then start assignment because last time in assignment 1 you forgot to add topic “digital innovation”.So I add this topic and submit it.Please be careful in this time and read all instructions and marking criteria” Strategy Planning In this professional business report, you must at least cover the following points adequately: n Develop a future state of the organization; n Articulate and identify the way to move from the current state to the future state; n Alignment with the organisation’s existing business strategies; n Alignment with the organisation’s existing business processes; n Strategic plan / conceptual design / Business case; n Adoption and change management; n Risk management; n Governance – Stakeholders Management; and n Governance – Costing and Budget Management. Marking Criteria Marking criteria Marks Activity 1. The report should be well structured and cover at least the following topics: - Structure • Properly formatted well presented business report • Executive Summary • Recommendations • Conclusion - References • 10 References at least o Relevant citations within the report Marker Feedback: 2. Develop a future state of the organization; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: /10 3. Articulate and identify the way to move from the current state to the future state; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: /10 4. Alignment with the organisation’s existing business strategies; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback: /8 5. Alignment with the organisation’s existing business processes; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback: /8 6. Strategic plan / conceptual design / Business case; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (4 – 6 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (7 – 10 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (11 – 15 points) Marker Feedback: /15 7. Adoption and change management; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (4 – 6 points) /12 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (7 – 9 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (10 – 12 points) Marker Feedback: /12 8. Risk management; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (4 – 6 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (7 – 9 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (10 – 12 points) Marker Feedback /12 9. Governance – Stakeholders Management; and 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback /10 10. Governance – Costing and Budget Management. 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: /10 11. Quality and relevance of Conclusion(s)/recommendations 1: Poor (poor conclusion and recommendations, grammar and spelling mistakes) (0- 1 points) 2: Average (weak conclusion and recommendations, grammar and spelling mistakes) (2 points) 3: Good (good conclusion, no grammar and spelling mistakes, acceptable expression) (3 – 4 points) 4: Excellent (great conclusion, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors) (5 points) Marker Feedback /5 .