MPM705 Retailing Assignment: Assessment rubric Criteria Not attempted Needs improvement Acceptable Good Very Excellent Specific Knowledge and Capabilities of Theories and models of Retailing. Provides an explanation that is not consistent with the existing theories or/and fails to establish the link between the topic and the relevant theories. Furthermore, summary of the given article is not coherent and does not provide incorrect interpretation. Provides an explanation that demonstrates some ability in establishing the link between the topic and existing theories. Furthermore, summary of the given article may be coherent but provides incorrect interpretation. Provides an explanation that demonstrates a good ability in establishing the link between the topic and the existing theories. However, the explanation demonstrates superficial knowledge of the theories. The, summary of the given article is coherent, and provides correct interpretation. Provides an explanation that demonstrates a competent knowledge in establishing the link between the topic and existing theories. Also demonstrates an accurate understanding of the theories. The summary of the given article is coherent, and provides correct interpretation. Provides an explanation that demonstrates knowledge in establishing the link between the topic and the existing theories. Also demonstrates accurate understanding of the theories. Proficient with the interpretation of one perspective. The summary of the given article is coherent, and provides correct interpretation. Demonstrates a depth of knowledge in establishing the link between the topic and existing theories. Also demonstrates accurate understanding of the theories. Proficient with the interpretation of different perspectives. Furthermore, summary of the given article is coherent and provides correct interpretation. Critical Thinking (Existing Knowledge, Research or/and Views relating to the management of retailing) Poor or missing analysis of theories. Always presents information from inappropriate sources representing very limited points of view or approaches. Inadequate demonstration of critical analysis of relevant theories and models. Poor reasoning and argument with no supporting evidence. Often presents information from inappropriate sources representing limited points of view or approaches. Mostly adequate demonstration of critical analysis of theories and models, yet some inconsistencies remain in the arguments. Presents information from relevant sources representing various points of view or approaches, and demonstrating a mastery of theoretical knowledge. General demonstration of critical analysis of theories and models. Presents complex information from relevant sources representing various points of view or approaches, and demonstrating a mastery of theoretical knowledge. Provides diagrams explaining one critical aspect of the theories. Accurate demonstration of critical analysis of theories and models. Synthesises information and knowledge from a range of relevant sources representing various points of view, approaches and demonstrating a high level of mastery of theoretical knowledge. Provides diagrams explaining different critical aspects of the theories. Scholarly demonstration of critical analysis of theories and models. Synthesises complex information and knowledge from a broad range of relevant sources representing various points of view, approaches and demonstrating a high level of mastery of theoretical knowledge and expert understanding of recent developments in the discipline and/or area of professional practice. Provides diagrams explaining different critical aspects of the theories. Problem Solving Demonstrates no ability to independently construct a clear statement about a complex problem or research hypothesis. Proposes no solutions or ideas to address new and complex problems. Demonstrates no evidence of initiative in planning and identifies no viable approaches for solving complex problems. Demonstrates a limited ability to independently construct a clear statement about a complex hypothesis. Proposes inappropriate solutions or ideas to address new and complex problems. Demonstrates limited evidence of initiative in planning and identifies few viable approaches for solving complex problems. Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to independently and expertly construct a clear statement about a complex problem or research hypothesis with evidence. Creates an acceptable new object, solution, or idea. Proposes one or more acceptable creative solutions to existing and/or new situations in professional practice; also the solution reflects proficient judgement of the pros and cons of the various options. Demonstrates a good ability to independently and expertly construct a clear statement about a complex problem or research hypothesis with evidence of reasonably relevant contextual factors. Proposes reasonable adaptations of existing objects, solutions or ideas to address new and complex problems Demonstrates a very high level of initiative in planning and identifies multiple approaches for researching and solving complex problems. Provide relevant diagrams. Demonstrates a very good ability to independently and expertly construct a clear and insightful statement about a complex problem or research hypothesis with evidence of relevant contextual factors. Create a brilliant innovative new object, solution or idea. Proposes adaptations of existing objects, solutions or ideas to address new and complex problems, reflects on and evaluates the creative process and product. Skilfully extends an existing idea. Demonstrates a high level of initiative in planning and identifies multiple, innovative approaches. Provide relevant diagrams Demonstrates exceedingly high ability to independently and expertly construct a clear and insightful statement about a complex problem or research hypothesis with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. Create a ground-breaking innovative new object, solution or idea. Proposes adaptations of existing objects, solutions or ideas to address new and complex problems, reflects on and evaluates the creative process and product. Outstandingly extends an existing idea. Demonstrates a very high level of initiative in planning and identifies multiple, innovative approaches. Proposes one or more exemplary creative, novel solutions to existing and/or new situations in professional practice. Provide relevant diagrams. Overall Score for an Assignment of 50% N 0 or more N 10 or more P 25 or more C 30 or more D 35 or more HD 40 or more