DEB100 DESIGN + SUSTAINABILITY - SEM 1 CRITERIA REFERENCED ASSESSMENT SHEET CRITERIA 1 (1 - 24%) 2 (25 -39%) 3 (40 - 49%) 4 (50 - 64%) 6 (75 - 84%) 7 (85 - 100%) 25.0% None or Little. Limited. Ineffective or uncritical understanding / application. Basic understanding / application. Well developed breadth and depth of understanding / application. Highly developed depth and breadth of understanding / application Mark 100 25.0% None or Little. Limited. Ineffective or uncritical understanding / application. Basic understanding / application. Well developed breadth and depth of understanding / application. Highly developed depth and breadth of understanding / application Mark 100 25.0% None or Little. Limited. Ineffective or uncritical understanding / application. Basic understanding. Well developed breadth and depth of understanding / application. Highly developed depth and breadth of understanding / application Mark 0 100 25.0% None or Little. Limited. Ineffective or uncritical understanding / application. Basic understanding/ application. Well developed breadth and depth of understanding / application. Highly developed depth and breadth of understanding / application Mark 0 100 0.0% Mark Student Name Student Number Assignment 2 - CASE STUDY (40%) OUTCOMES: A4 size REPORT document that includes text and proper attribution of data and images. Final Mark 5 (65 - 74%) Good breadth but limited depth of knowledge/ application. #N/A Comment: Good breadth but limited depth of understanding / application. Good breadth but limited depth of understanding / application. Good breadth but limited depth of understanding / application. Weight Understanding of Design Sustainability Clear statement of RESEARCH FRAMEWORK of economy / ecology / culture aspects. Explanation of RELATIONSHIP between chosen exemplar & framework. Relevance of the 3 chosen foci in relation to the exemplar. Communication Effective general presentation skills (format and organisation of content) Writing of high quality, with clarity & organization of ideas. Ability to illustrate report with relevant visual material. Critical/Creative Interpretation Locate relevant and reliable information. Attention to clarity, accuracy, relevance, depth, breadth, logic and sequence in analysis. Work Practices QUT Harvard Style referencing. Accessed research for exemplar from multiple sources: books, academic journals, scholarly websites. GENERAL COMMENTS (also see comments written on assignment):¨ Improve KNOWLEDGE of sustainability and design through wider investigations, greater accuracy and better understanding of facts & theoretical ideas. ¨ Use consistent Referencing Style (QUT Harvard is the preferred CIF style): consult Library online help sites including (CITE | WRITE). ¨ ALL material used (books, papers, online, images) must be cited properly. ¨ Improve DATA RETRIEVAL SKILLS: use only reliable and authoritative sources, e.g. avoid commercial sites & most personal Blogs. ¨ - Improve THINKING SKILLS through deeper analysis, use better reasoning & apply greater application of effort.. - BRIEF for assignment not answered; consult your tutor if you are unsure of what is required. - Avoid ASSUMPTIONS and GENERALISATIONS in analytical thinking. BIAS of any sort does not help effective thinking. - Improve WRITTEN COMMUNICATION SKILLS: Refine clarity and organisation of ideas.