Assignment title: Information
Overview
Prepare a full long-form valuation report of a single detached residential dwelling cottage
property which is more than 10 years old. It must be freehold title and may be occupied. Unless
you reside in New South Wales, the subject property must be in N.S.W.; externally enrolled
interstate or overseas students do not have to comply with this restriction. Further criteria:
The subject property must have a reasonable curtilage. It is prudent to select a property with
no significant latent development potential in the foreseeable future.
The property may be valued on a vacant possession basis but can be owner occupied at the
date of valuation. We recommend & always prefer fee simple in possession.
Mortgage security is explicitly stipulated for valuation purposes in accord with. 8.2 ANZVGN 2
Valuations for Mortgage and Loan Security Purposes and risk analysis will be a key
focus http://anzvps.api.org.au/8-2- vgn.php
Similarly, on-completion, rental; financial reporting/balance sheet; statutory, acquisition/disposal
or stamp duty valuations are to be expressly avoided. Insurance valuations are not allowed nor
forced sale value https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEb40MkZbx0&feature=youtu.be
A secondary check method of valuation is compulsory.
Details
To follow the ANZPI professional standards: http://anzvps.api.org.au/index.php
Further clarification and discussion will be carried out in class. Students are expected to peruse
the vUWS posted materials relating to sales evidence & the inherent/external features
associated with both unimproved and improved residential property. Identifying risk factors &
appropriate sighting of documents as per pp.13-14 of the Australian Banking and Finance
Industry (ABFI) Residential Valuation Standing Instructions Version 1.1.4 (September 2016) will
prove instructive.https://www.api.org.au/residential-valuation- standing-instructions
VALUATION REPORT
1. The premises are to be described in terms of size, construction and layout-
and present use. Additionally, students are to outline and investigate the
status of the selected property in terms of town planning considerations.
2. Having regard to the current use of the premises the basis of valuation
must be “current market value”; students are to put forward prime,
supporting secondary (check) methods of valuation and must identify
market data presently available to the valuer (e.g. sales).
3. Additionally, students will highlight the points of comparison discerned in
the key sales transactions identified in the rationale` section of valuation
report. What attributes assisted their deliberations in arriving at the final
value conclusion in accord with the stated report purpose. See Millington,
Ch.7.
4. Students will prepare a full-speaking narrative professional valuation report
for the selected premises. The ANZVPS Business Focus 14.3 Reports,
Content and Compilation section specifically refers to self-contained or
comprehensive style reporting format. http://anzvps.api.org.au/14-3-
business-focus.php
Details of all valuation calculations, methodology, assumptions, and sales
analysis are required. Professional standards must encompass instructions,
valuation executive summary, evidence and annexures. Especially,
students will identify the matters that must be conveyed to persons
commissioning a valuation of the premises selected for this exercise.
Observance and adherence to the APINZ Valuation and Property
Standards will be strictly evaluated.
The traditional industry reporting format does not preclude scholarly discussion (where relevant)
and proper referencing for this subject’s purposes. For all intents and purposes i) to iii) above
may be viewed as client instructions as the observant student will note that these issues should
be addressed in any quality valuation report. Students will be critiqued on the appropriateness of
the basis (preferably market value), purpose, interest to be valued and valuation methodologies
for the chosen subject property.
Word limit is 2,500 words maximum incorporating if deemed relevant, figures, tables/charts, floor
and site plans, locality maps, photos/pictures, sales transaction analysis schedules, field notes,
supporting valuation calculations and workings; qualifications, disclaimers, acknowledgements,
table of contents, executive summary and reference list. Students must hone, edit and re-edit
their reports down to a lean, succinct, concise document. Endeavour to cultivate a superior
professional and objective narrative tone that flows.
Note exclusions: No residential flats, attached townhouses, villa units or multiple medium
density buildings. No strata title or community title properties are acceptable.
It is envisaged that students will consult the lecturer/tutors associated with this topic with a view
to discussing in some detail the premises that are selected for the purposes of the exercise.
This unit is not to be viewed as a discrete subject area. To this end students are encouraged to
implement and incorporate any skills or ‘tools’ acquired from other subject areas into their
valuation assignment.
Format requirements Assignments are to be produced on A4 with a WSU cover sheet indicating
Institution, Course Name/No., Due Date, Lecturer Name; Student Name;
Student Number; Unit Name; Unit Number and title of the assignment topic
incorporating land use and property address. Non-adherence will result in
significant penalties. Word Count also must be noted on cover sheet (utilise a
snapshot via “Properties” menu of W.P. software).
Page numbering is mandatory.
Students are required to keep a copy of all written work submitted. A
personal hardcopy is retained by the student and is to be available on
demand within 24 hours If any problems arise in relation to lost assignments
it is the responsibility of the student to provide a replacement copy.
Assignments must be word processed (or typed), size 12 font, one and a half
line spacing with adequate margins for comment. A proper bibliography, due
acknowledgments and consistent referencing systems (preferably Harvard)
are expected. No handwritten assignments will be accepted. Use and sign
the WS U assignment cover sheet. Only the Harvard referencing system
must be adopted. Footnotes will not be acceptable.
All sources of information, including acknowledgments and graphs are to be
referenced in both the text and the reference list. All background material is
to be acknowledged in the bibliography. Failure to correct the reference
material, or the submission of a report or valuation with inadequate content,
poor presentation and inaccurate information, regardless of accuracy of
referencing, will result in a fail grade.
Assignment
restrictions
Students are not allowed to undertake a land use/property type completed in
another unit or course within. Further no student will submit property address
that has been valued by another student of this unit in the last two years. If
you have any doubts in this respect, you must raise them with the unit
coordinator/teaching staff. Each student is to select a different property
address - if more than one valuation is carried out for the same property then
the assignment will be marked as one and students will share marks. It is not
the coordinators role to check duplication. The onus is on students to check.
To avert the above scenario each student will post to the “Discussion Blog”
via vUWS by the 14 March (Week 4), the property use and address of their
selected special premises for assignment purposes. It is expected that
students assiduously organise contacts and finalise arrangements in order to
make site inspections, conduct interviews and secure property data from
Week 1 of Autumn Session.
Students are required to pre-register their full nominated property address,
proper description and any subsequent changes via the vUWS “Discussion
Blog” which will be open from Week 1 and referred to below. First come, first
served. The coordinator will not be responsible for incomplete details. Some
students post an exterior photo.
If a problem is identified a student can apprise a peer courtesy of the blog’s
“Reply Comments” function! Usually this is avoided, especially if students
avail themselves of the “Discussion Blog” early in the piece and review other
student’s postings. Students can quickly see if more than one student is
doing the same property and communicate that to all parties. The first
blogger’s view is to be respected in this regard. The onus is on the students
to contact each other.
All e-mail assignment queries will be referred to the blog webpage. That way
all students benefit from the teaching staff comments in a transparent
manner.
Students should scroll down the blog for and under the “Pages” icon select
“ALL” on the right hand side to view the entire postings list and feedback.
A property address and use may change if a valid reason is explained to the
unit coordinator/tutor. This flexibility does not void the above requirement.
The unit coordinator and tutors have no problem with mentored, fee paying
supervised assignment submissions with proper due acknowledgement of all
parties, so long as the employer’s express consents/permission is obtained.
There is also no impediment to adopting a valuation firm or company’s
reporting format, jargon or standard descriptions and endorsements.
Spreadsheets, valuation calculations and analysis must be original. If any
assistance is provided by a valuer in any way, then the extent of this
assistance must be fully detailed and acknowledged in the report.
Permissions and clearances must be obtained regarding a specific building,
especially if a valuation report is being partially utilised as an information
source.
The assignment emphasis will be on the coherence of the property solution to
the valuation problem and whether the story of the property is communicated
effectively. The valuation report’s purpose and interest must conform to the
stated valuation approaches. The teaching & marking staff are concerned
with sales analysis, relevance to the marketplace and the methodologies
supporting the conclusion. We are not overly concerned with whether the
final current market value is 100 per cent accurate, right or wrong. The prime
areas of interest are the soundness of the valuation process and how well
that is represented in the parallel valuation report writing process.
The property address must always be real, actual and identified.
Non- adherence to
minimum
presentation
requirements
(penalty)
Any unsatisfactory submission will be returned (subject to the coordinator’s
discretion and in some instances collegial discussion), for reworking until
such time that it meets the standards required and stipulated. The maximum
mark that can be achieved if an assignment is returned due to non-
compliance with stated requirements is 50 per cent of the available marks.
Assignment
Resources and
Under both Assessments 1 and 2 vUWS online folders will be handy PDFs
and further links.
Assistance
View the current API Private Practitioners List on-line to assist students with
identifying individual valuer locations & specialties. Current API Practice is to
provide on-line access via the API
website. http://www.nsw.api.org.au/menuitem/property-professionals/find- a-
property-professional; navigate via state division, then groups for latest
contact update in your region or area of interest.
http://professionals.api.org.au/
http://nsw.api.cavwebservices.com/menuitem/professional-
development/discussion-groups
https://www.api.org.au/closed-exposure- drafts
https://www.api.org.au/resources/risk-management- module-resources- volume-
residential
https://www.api.org.au/course/residential-valuation- standing-instructions-
version-114
https://www.api.org.au/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/website-
content/tip_methods_of_measurement_endorsed_6th_may_2016_final_02112
016_.pdf
Repeating students Those students repeating this unit may elect to resubmit their previous
assignment; i.e. they must update their valuation report in terms of current
market values, sales evidence and trends. Obviously it is expected that any
previously issued feedback via template spreadsheet mark breakdown sheet
inserts provided and both typed/handwritten comments are enacted upon!
The essential requirement is that students will have to indicate they are
repeating the unit as Turnitin cannot support the resubmission of the previous
session’s assignment as well as the new document. The other option is to
simply undertake this year’s assignment with a new property.
Marking criteria and standards
A detailed marking guide with component weights for this assessment task follows but should be
read in conjunction with the Australia & New Zealand Valuation and Property Standards provided
on the vUWS site. Best advice is to peruse vUWS link and resources. The ANZV&PS over-ride
any perceived conflict or ambiguity. The following is a list of those features and hallmarks most
commonly associated (often in combination) with a fail grade:
No purpose or confused/inconsistent purpose of valuation;
No acknowledgements (must be extensive);
No check method of valuation undertaken or value provided;
No reconciliation of valuation approaches;
Misapplication of units of measurement or comparison, including adoption of averaging of
residential sales evidence;
No current 2015/17 dated Certificate of Title or