EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 1
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs
Syllabus for EDSE 632D1
Survey of Learners with Exceptionalities
3 credits – Online Delivery
NAME OF TERM: Spring 2017 Survey of Learners with Exceptionalities
CODE OF TERM: 2017M1
Instructor: Christine ‘Critty” McClendon
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 720-747-9614
Prerequisites: EDSE 631
Course Description:
This course emphasizes current knowledge of individuals with exceptionalities within the context of human growth and
development. Content includes historical factors; legislation; etiology; characteristics; needs; educational strategies,
including existing and emerging technologies; assessment; and support services for individuals with exceptionalities. The
course covers the impact of disabilities on academic and social/emotional performances. Field experience is required.
Learning Objectives: Upon Completion of this course, learners are expected to be able to have mastered the
following.
Mastered
Mastered – CORE
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education understands the foundations of special education,
including information about students served by special education. The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of
the:
(4) definitions, characteristics, and educational implications for students with disabilities eligible for special education
services;
(9) medical terminology and educational implications of medical conditions, including the effect of medication and
specialized health care in educational settings;
(13) roles and organizational structures of general and special education and the part they play in providing total
services to all students
C. Instructional design, teaching, and ongoing evaluation. A teacher of special education understands how to
provide and evaluate specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of students in special education
through individualized educational plans. The teacher must be able to:
(7) design and manage positive instructional environments that convey high expectations for students to develop their
independence, self-motivation, self-direction, self-regulation, and self-advocacy;
Mastered – EBD
Mastered – ASD
Mastered – LD
This is a graduate level licensure program therefore the following apply:
The Master of Arts in Special Education (MA in SPED) program is a constructivist program grounded in active course
session participation.
Active Engagement: Engagement is a required component of MA in SPED and necessary for a passing
grade. Engagement is necessary for demonstration of the Minnesota Standards of Effective Practice (MN Rule 8710.200)
and is required for licensure recommendation (Appendix 1).EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 2
Participation Expectations: Students are expected to participate in the course as is required to turn in graduate level
work. Please review the due dates for all activities and contact your instructor if you are facing any problems. For
technical issues, please call the 24/7 personal support center.
Engage Course Log-On: You should log-on to the Engage course a minimum of 5 times per week, allowing for
sufficient time to complete required activities.
Software tools:
1. Personal Computer: Access to a computer with Windows 7 or later or Mac OS X will be necessary to complete the
course work. The learner should have access to technology at each course session. Learners will never be excused
from a due date because of a technology issue [regardless of who is to blame]. Learners should complete activities
well enough in advance to ensure that there is time to account for technology failures.
2. Internet Service: High speed service is recommended. Dial up may work if the connection is stable. If not, the
learner should pursue alternate means of meeting the Internet requirement. Learners will never be excused from a due
date because of a technology issue [regardless of who is to blame]. Learners should complete activities well enough
in advance to ensure that there is time to account for technology failures.
3. Adobe Acrobat Reader®: Free download available.
4. Microsoft Office: Microsoft Office is the standard. Therefore, activities must be completed with software such as
Microsoft Word® for Windows. If Apple iWork or an alternative program (OpenOffice, Google Docs) is used, it must
be exported as a Windows file using the proper file extensions (.docx preferred) or as specified by the instructor.
Online Conduct: Please refer to the MA in SPED Handbook for online conduct procedures.
Required Textbooks:
Hallahan, D. P. & Kauffman, J. M. (2014). Exceptional Learners: An Instruction to Special Education. Exceptional
Learners, An Introduction to Special Education. New York, NY: Pearson.
ISBN-13:978-0-13-703370-6
Muhammad, Anthony and Hollie Sharroky. (2011). The Will to Lead, the Skill to Teach: Transforming Schools at Every
Level. Solution Tree.
ISBN: 9781935542544
Course Requirements:
All activities must be turned in on time, with careful attention to detail (points will be deducted for late work); attendance
at all sessions.
SMU Central:
If you have a disability, either permanent or temporary, or any other circumstance that might affect your ability to perform
in this course, inform the instructor so s/he can adapt methods, material, or activities to provide equitable participation. In
order to receive appropriate accommodations you must have documentation on file with the university.
University Resources:
See the course Engage site for direct links to the library and writing center. Use of the writing center is strongly
recommended.
Engage Information:
Engage may be accessed by entering the following URL into your browser: https://engage.smumn.edu.
Discussion Boards: Learners must respond to the initial post AND three additional posts (a total of 4 posts). Posts must
be consistent with master’s level quality work.
Virtual Classroom: Learners must be available to participate on the date and time assigned by the instructor.
Online Chat: Learners must be available to participate on the date and time assigned by the instructor.
Technical Support:
The Engage help desk is available 24/7 and may be accessed by phone at 877-308-9954 option 3 or by email at
[email protected] 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 3
Academic and Conduct Policies:
Please refer to the online SGPP handbook and M.A. in Special Education Student Handbook for policies and other
important information.
Student Rating of Teaching and Learning
Learners are expected to provide feedback about teaching and learning in the course. Please check your SMU email near
the end of the course for a link to an online rating from that records responses anonymously.EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 4
All “Readings Due” are to be completed prior to the course session. All “Activities” are to be submitted via Engage
by midnight the day of the course session, unless otherwise noted by the instructor.
Supplemental Materials can be found in the “Course Materials” section on Engage in the folder corresponding
with the appropriate week.
All activities will be submitted online (no hard copies to be turned in).
Topical Course Outline:
Dates by
Week
Course
Session
Dates/Time
Topics Covered Readings &
Activities
Week 1
February 27 -
March 5, 2017
Online Review of syllabus, discussion of
readings, exceptional learners.
History & origin of SPED.
Assessment issues in the age of
accountability. Dilemma of
standards and exceptionality.
In Class Activity: Legal
Issues discussion
In Class Activity: RtI
Accommodations &
Modifications discussion
Standards Introduced:
CB9, CC1
Reading Due (Hallahan):
Chapter 1 Exceptionality and Special Education
Chapter 2 Current Practices for Meeting the Needs
of Exceptional Learners
Graded Activity Two Due: SPED Interview
Supplemental Materials in Weekly Folder on
Engage
Week 2
March 6 – 12,
2017
Online Multicultural and bilingual
aspects of special education, RtI
and CRT, parental involvement,
Brofenbrenner’s Social Theory
Model. Universal Design for
Learning (UDL) and Banks’
Multicultural Education Pyramid,
co-teaching models.
Activity: The Will to Lead, the
Skill to Teach: Transforming
Schools at Every Level
(Muhammad, Hollie)
In Class Activity: APA Paper
discussion
Graded Activity Five Project &
Presentation: Sign up for
presentation groups. Discuss
requirements of presentation
(length, final product, choice of
media).
Standards Introduced:
CD1, ASDA6, LDA3
Reading Due (Hallahan):
Chapter 3 Multicultural and Bilingual Aspects of
SPED
Chapter 4 Parents and Families
Reading Due (Muhammad):
Chapter 2 Conflicting Wills
Graded Activity Three Due: Multicultural &
Bilingual Aspects of SPED Paper
Supplemental Materials in Weekly Folder on
EngageEDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 5
Week 3
March 13-19,
2017
Online Learners with specific learning
disabilities (SLD)
Activity: Small group
compare and contrast SLD Rule
with eligibility sheet.
Activity: Compare and contrast
ABC with ABD (see flow chart,
SLD Manual Chap 2, p. 8)
Graded Activity Eight: Discuss
requirements and answer
questions.
Standards Introduced:
LDB5, LDC3, LDC11
Reading Due (Hallahan):
Chapter 6 Learners with Learning Disabilities
Supplemental Materials in Weekly Folder
on Engage
Week 4
March 20-26,
2017
Online Learners with intellectual and
developmental disabilities and the
effect of medication and
specialized health care in
educational settings, assistive
technology.
Standards Introduced: CA9, CA6,
CA7, LDA7
Reading Due (Hallahan):
Chapter 5 Learners with Intellectual and
Developmental Disabilities
Chapter 11 Learners who are Deaf or Hard of
Hearing
Respond to Week 4 Small Group Discussion:
Collaboration
Virtual Classroom: Medication and Specialized
Health Care
Supplemental Materials in Weekly Folder on
Engage
Week 5
March 27 –
April 2, 2017
Online Learners with Autism Spectrum
Disorders (ASD),
speech/language disorders.
Activity: Video/Web Discussion
View PBIS You Tube:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2011/0
4/viewers-guide-autism-today.html
View and explore web site:
http://www.includingsamuel.com/media/Video
/ExtendedTrailer.aspx
What most impressed you about
the caring adults in the lives of
the children featured in the video
clips? What might that mean for
you as a teacher?
Activity: Identify ways in which
teachers could facilitate the social
use of language in their
classrooms.
Activity: Discuss “Sujeet” video.
Reading Due (Hallahan):
Chapter 9 Learners with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Chapter 10 Learners with Communication Disorders
Graded Activity Four Due:
Autism and Speech Lang. Pathology
Interview
Supplemental Materials in Weekly Folder on
EngageEDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 6
Standards Introduced: ASDA8,
ASDC2, LDA4, CA7, LDA7
Week 6
April 3-9,
2017
Online Learners with Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD).
Standards Introduced: CA6,
ASDA8, CA9
Reading Due (Hallahan):
Chapter 7 Learners with ADHD
Respond to Week 6 Discussion Board: ADHD
Supplemental Materials in Weekly Folder on
Engage
Week 7
April 10 -16,
2017
Online Learners with Emotional and
Behavioral Disorders (EBD)
Standards Introduced: CA6,
EBDA4, EBDA7, EBDA8,
EBDA11, EBDC5, EBDA6
Reading Due (Hallahan):
Chapter 8 Learners with EBD
Respond to Week 7 Discussion Board: EBD
Supplemental Materials in Weekly Folder on
Engage
Week 8
April 11-23,
2017
Online Presentations of Graded Activity
Five: Chapter Analysis
Presentation
Complete Instructor Feedback
online
Standards Introduced: CA4
Graded Activity Five Due: Chapter Analysis
Summary and Presentation
Upon completion of EDSE632, complete
Learning Activity One
Upon completion of EDSE632, complete Graded
Activity One
Upon completion of EDSE632, complete Graded
Activity Six
Supplemental Materials in Weekly Folder on
Engage
Learning Activities Necessary for Licensure Preparation:
Learning activities will ensure that the learner has completed coursework pertaining to mastery of the state standards and
completed activities/presented evidence within the electronic portfolio that will demonstrate the practicing educator has
met licensure competencies. These activities are not graded but must be completed to ensure mastery.
Graded Activities:
Graded activities will ensure that the learner has completed coursework pertaining to completion of the course. These
activities are graded.
EDSE 632 Course Activities Quick List:
1. Learning Activity One: Electronic Portfolio
2. Graded Activity One: Active Engagement (Appendix 1)
3. Graded Activity Two: Exceptionality & SPED Interview (Appendix 5)
4. Graded Activity Three: Multicultural & Bilingual Aspects of SPED Paper (Appendix 2)
5. Graded Activity Four: Autism & Speech/Lang. Pathology Interview (Appendix 5)
6. Graded Activity Five: Chapter Analysis Summary and Presentation (Appendix 3 and Appendix 5)
7. Graded Activity Six: Classroom Observation (Appendix 4)
*Note: If you already have evidence demonstrating your achievement of the expected knowledge and skills for any
activity, please meet with the instructor to develop an alternative activity that further extends and challenges you.EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 7
Grade Point Breakdown:
GA 1………………..10 Points
GA 2………………..10 Points
GA 3………………..30 Points
GA 4………………..10 Points
GA 5………………..30 Points
GA 6……………+ 10 Points
100 Total Points Possible
Grading Policies
Grading policies are consistent with university policy as stated in the current Catalog and Student Handbook.
Graduate Grading Scale:
Points Earned Percent Grade
100-90 100-90% A (4.0)
89-80 89-80% B (3.0)
79-70 79-70% C (2.0)
Less than 70 <70% *NC (0.0)
*No Credit
M.A. in Special Education Grading/Mastery of Standards:
In each course there are two forms of assessment:
1. Graded Activities
2. Mastery of State Standards (based on Learning Activity One: Electronic Portfolio)
The learner will receive a grade based on the Graded Activities and will be assessed on mastery of the state standards. If
standards are not mastered the instructor will notify the Program Director who will, in turn, contact the learner to
complete additional activities to demonstrate mastery. A passing grade for the course does not guarantee mastery of the
standards.EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 8
Learning Activity One: Electronic Portfolio
Description of Activity:
The electronic portfolio should be updated with evidence gathered during coursework and submitted under the appropriate
standards upon completion of the course.
The following grid outlines the competencies met during this course and will serve as a checklist of items that must be
submitted as evidence of mastery of the MN State Standards. The electronic portfolio will be reviewed by the instructor
upon the completion of each course and will serve as documentation for licensure recommendation.
Submission: Electronic Portfolio
Checklist for Mastery: Items to be submitted to the electronic portfolio
State Standard Evidence gathered/demonstrated in course activities
CA4, CA9, CA13 Graded Activity Five: Chapter Summary and Analysis (submit the one page summary)
CC7 Graded Activity Six: Classroom Observation
Week Due: Week 8EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 9
Graded Activity One: Active Engagement
Description of Activity:
Active engagement is a necessary component of demonstration of the standards of mastery and is required for licensure.
Learner will write a 1 paragraph (7-10 sentences) reflection addressing each portion of the rubric. Learners will assign
themselves a grade for the activity based on the rubric. Final grade will be determined by the instructor.
Competencies Met:
This activity will ensure that you have met the following state standards:
SEP6, SEP10
Submission: Engage, Course Menu, Activities (embed)
Supplemental materials to be used for completion of activity:
Appendix 1
Points Possible: 10
Week Due: Week 8EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 10
Appendix 1 Active Engagement Rubric
Scoring Rubric for Active Engagement
Does Not Meet
Expectation
Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation Points
Possible
Interaction Provides minimal
connection through
course discussions.
0 pts
Participates and
engages in reflection
on the contributions
of others for each
course session.
Participates in
discussion board
dialogue.
1 pt
Participates at a high level of
contribution and interaction
within class discussions.
Demonstrates the ability to
engage in critical reflection on
the questions and the
contributions of other class
members. Contributes highlevel quality discussion board
posts.
2 pts /2
Contribution Listens to class
conversation on
selected topics.
0 pts
Participates and
provides input to
conversations
throughout
discussion board
posts.
1 pt
Participates and provides input
in all class discussions and
discussion board posts.
2 pts /2
Initiative Lack of connection
with course instructor
or other class
members.
0 pts
Uses e-mail to clarify
course activities and
expectations.
1 pt
Engages in communication on
a regular basis to stimulate
risk taking and creativity
within the course.
2 pts /2
SelfReflection
Rarely shares personal
reflections on reading,
class discussion,
activities, group and
individual projects
through participation.
Shows limited
awareness of personal
communication and
collaboration styles.
0 pts
Shares personal
reflection regarding
class materials and
understanding of
implication to self
through participation.
Shows awareness of
impacts on personal
communication and
collaboration styles
in interactions with
instructors and
colleagues.
2 pts
Keeps constant discussion
with instructor and/or class
members regarding selfreflection on class materials
and experiences on the job.
Shows awareness of dynamics
with the class and facilitates
positive interactions among
class members.
4 pts /4
Total Points: /10EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 11
Graded Activity Two: Exceptionality & SPED Interview
Description of Activity:
Interview a parent/guardian of a learner with an exceptionality, focusing on the family’s experiences and feelings. If the
learner is of school age listen for the parents perceptions of that experience. Submit the questions you asked along with a
1 page summary.
Submission: Engage, Course Menu, Activities (embed)
Supplemental materials to be used for completion of activity:
Appendix 5
Points Possible: 10
Week Due: Week 1EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 12
Appendix 5 Scoring Rubric for Summary
Does Not Meet
Expectation
Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation Points
Possible
Organization The summary begins
with a clear topic
sentence that states
the main idea of the
original selection; all
other major points are
stated economically
and arranged in
logical order; a
concluding sentence
effectively brings the
summary to a close,
but no details or
reflections are added;
the writing is unified
and coherent
throughout.
0 pts
The summary begins
with a topic sentence
that states the main
idea of the original
selection; all other
major ideas are
stated and arranged
in a generally logical
order; a concluding
sentence brings the
summary to a close,
but extraneous
details or reflections
may be added; the
progression of ideas
and information is,
for the most part,
logical.
1-3 pts
The summary may or
may not state the
main idea of the
original selection, or
it may not do so at
the beginning; it
states some, but not
all, major ideas and
not necessarily in a
logical order; the
summary may lack a
conclusion or include
extraneous details or
reflections; the
development of ideas
is not completely
logical or coherent.
3.5 pts /3.5
Elements of
Summary
The overall purpose
of the summary is
clear; the summary
expresses only the
main idea and major
points of the original
selection; the writing
is tailored to the
audience. Word
choice is consistently
efficient and concise.
0 pts
The purpose is
generally clear; the
summary expresses
only the main idea
and most major
points of the original
selection; most of
the writing is
tailored to the
audience. Word
choice is fairly
concise.
1-3 pts
The purpose wavers;
the summary does not
accurately express
the main idea or most
major points of the
original selection;
most of the writing is
not tailored to the
audience. Word
choice is vague or
repetitive.
3.5 pts /3.5
Spelling,
Mechanics, and
Grammar
There are few or no
errors in mechanics,
usage, grammar, or
spelling.
0 pts
There are some
errors in mechanics,
usage, grammar, or
spelling.
1-2 pts
There are serious
errors in mechanics,
usage, grammar, or
spelling.
3pts /3
Total Points: ____ / 10EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 13
Graded Activity Three: Multicultural & Bilingual Aspects of SPED Paper
Description of Activity:
The learner will understand the impact of gender, familial background, socioeconomic status, racial, and linguistic
diversity on disabilities and involvement in all aspects of special education. Guiding questions include, but are not limited
to: how do special education teams ensure that gender, familial background, socioeconomic status, racial, and linguistic
diversity are not mistaken for an exceptionality? What interventions could assist a special education team in
differentiating between diversity and exceptionality? The learner should include a minimum of three scholarly articles.
Paper must be in APA format.
Submission: Engage, Course Menu, Activities
Supplemental materials to be used for completion of activity:
Appendix 2
Points Possible: 30
Week Due: Week 2EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 14
Appendix 2 Rubric for Written Work
Scoring Rubric for Written Work
Does Not Meet
Expectation
Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation
0-4 pts 5-9 pts 10 pts
Points
Possible
APA Format Neglects to follow the
requirements related to
APA format and layout.
Follows, for the most part,
all of the requirements
related to format and APA
format. Some
requirements are not
followed.
Closely follows all
requirements related to
APA format and layout.
/10
Clarity and
Organization
The essay is not well
written, and contains
many errors in spelling,
grammar, and/or use of
Standard American
English. The essay is
poorly organized, lacks
clarity, and/or does not
present ideas in a
coherent way.
The essay is well written
for the most part, with
minimal error in spelling,
grammar and use of
Standard American
English. Errors do not
detract from meaning or
readability. The essay is
for the most part well
organized, clear and
presents ideas in a coherent
way.
The essay is well
written from start to
finish, without error in
spelling, grammar or
use of Standard
American English. The
essay is well organized,
clear and presents ideas
in a coherent way.
/10
Content The essay is not objective
and/or poorly addresses
the issues referred in the
proposed topic. The
provided information is
not necessary or
insufficient to discuss
these issues.
The essay is objective and
for the most part addresses,
with an in depth analysis,
most of the issues referred
in the proposed topic. The
provided information is,
for the most part, necessary
and sufficient to discuss
these issues.
The essay is objective
and addresses, with an
in depth analysis, all the
issues referred to in the
proposed topic. The
provided information is
necessary and sufficient
to discuss these issues.
/10
Total Points: /30EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 15
Graded Activity Four: Autism and Speech/Lang. Pathology Interview
Description of Activity:
The learner will interview a speech/language pathologist to obtain information regarding his/her role and responsibilities.
Visit http://www.asha.org for guidance on preparing interview questions (search: roles of speech language pathologists).
Submit the interview questions along with a 1 page summary.
Submission: Engage, Course Menu, Activities (embed)
Supplemental materials to be used for completion of activity:
Appendix 5
Points Possible: 10
Week Due: Week 5EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 16
Appendix 5 Scoring Rubric for Summary
Does Not Meet
Expectation
Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation Points
Possible
Organization The summary begins
with a clear topic
sentence that states
the main idea of the
original selection; all
other major points are
stated economically
and arranged in
logical order; a
concluding sentence
effectively brings the
summary to a close,
but no details or
reflections are added;
the writing is unified
and coherent
throughout.
0 pts
The summary begins
with a topic sentence
that states the main
idea of the original
selection; all other
major ideas are
stated and arranged
in a generally logical
order; a concluding
sentence brings the
summary to a close,
but extraneous
details or reflections
may be added; the
progression of ideas
and information is,
for the most part,
logical.
1-3 pts
The summary may or
may not state the
main idea of the
original selection, or
it may not do so at
the beginning; it
states some, but not
all, major ideas and
not necessarily in a
logical order; the
summary may lack a
conclusion or include
extraneous details or
reflections; the
development of ideas
is not completely
logical or coherent.
3.5 pts /3.5
Elements of
Summary
The overall purpose
of the summary is
clear; the summary
expresses only the
main idea and major
points of the original
selection; the writing
is tailored to the
audience. Word
choice is consistently
efficient and concise.
0 pts
The purpose is
generally clear; the
summary expresses
only the main idea
and most major
points of the original
selection; most of
the writing is
tailored to the
audience. Word
choice is fairly
concise.
1-3 pts
The purpose wavers;
the summary does not
accurately express
the main idea or most
major points of the
original selection;
most of the writing is
not tailored to the
audience. Word
choice is vague or
repetitive.
3.5 pts /3.5
Spelling,
Mechanics, and
Grammar
There are few or no
errors in mechanics,
usage, grammar, or
spelling.
0 pts
There are some
errors in mechanics,
usage, grammar, or
spelling.
1-2 pts
There are serious
errors in mechanics,
usage, grammar, or
spelling.
3pts /3
Total Points: ____ / 10EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 17
Graded Activity Five: Chapter Analysis Summary and Presentation
Description of Activity:
Groups will provide a summary and analysis of a chapter (10-15). Groups will be evaluated for the activity based on the
ability to demonstrate an analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the chapter. The means by which groups demonstrate
understanding and the ability to synthesize the material for presentation may include, but is not limited to: outlines,
artifacts, visuals, etc. Groups should supplement the textbook with a minimum of 3 scholarly sources not already used in
the course.
The presentation must include definitions, characteristics, and educational implications for students with disabilities
eligible for special education services; medical terminology and educational implications of medical conditions, including
the effects of medication and specialized health care in educational settings; roles and organizational structures of general
and special education and the part they play in providing total services to all students.
Each learner will submit an individual 1-2 page summary of the group findings (include scholarly sources in APA
format).
Competencies Met:
This activity will ensure that you have met the following state standards:
CA4, CA9, CA13
Submission: Engage, Course Menu, Activities (embed)
Supplemental materials to be used for completion of activity:
Appendix 3
Appendix 5
Points Possible: 30
Week Due: Week 8EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 18
Appendix 3 Presentation Rubric
Scoring Rubric for Presentations
Does Not Meet
Expectation
Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation
Content
Topic is unclear;
information included that is
not pertinent to topic in any
way
Sufficient information
relates to topic; many good
points made, but uneven
balance and little variation
An abundance of material clearly
related to topic; points are clearly
made; varied use of material
Coherence and
Organization
Presentation is choppy and
disjointed; does not flow;
no apparent logical order to
presentation
Most information presented
in a logical sequence;
generally well organized
but better transitions from
idea to idea needed
Topic is clear and developed;
specific examples are clearly
developed; flows together well;
clear transitions; succinct but not
choppy; well organized
Creativity
Repetitive with little or no
variety; insufficient use of
multimedia and/or
technology
Some originality apparent;
good variety of blending
materials and technology
Very original presentation of
material; uses the unexpected to
full advantage; captures the
audiences attention
Material
Little or no use of
technology; ineffective us
of technology; imbalance
in use of material
Use of technology not as
varied and not well
connected to material
Balanced use of materials; use of
technology is varied and
appropriate
Speaking Skills
Inaudible or too loud; no
eye contact; rate to
slow/fast; speaker seemed
uninterested and used
monotone
Clear articulation but not as
polished
Poised, clear articulation; proper
volume; steady rate; good posture
and eye contact; enthusiasm;
confidence
Length of
Presentation
Too long or too short; ten
or more minutes above or
below the allotted time
Within four minutes of
allotted time
Within two minutes of allotted
timeEDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 19
Appendix 5 Summary Rubric
Scoring Rubric for Summary
Does Not Meet Expectation Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation
Organization The summary may or may
not state the main idea of the
original selection, or it may
not do so at the beginning; it
states some, but not all,
major ideas and not
necessarily in a logical order;
the summary may lack a
conclusion or include
extraneous details or
reflections; the development
of ideas is not completely
logical or coherent.
The summary begins with a
topic sentence that states
the main idea of the
original selection; all other
major ideas are stated and
arranged in a generally
logical order; a concluding
sentence brings the
summary to a close, but
extraneous details or
reflections may be added;
the progression of ideas and
information is, for the most
part, logical.
The summary begins with a
clear topic sentence that
states the main idea of the
original selection; all other
major points are stated
economically and arranged
in logical order; a
concluding sentence
effectively brings the
summary to a close, with
helpful details or reflections
added; the writing is unified
and coherent throughout.
Elements of Summary The purpose wavers; the
summary does not accurately
express the main idea or most
major points of the original
selection; most of the writing
is not tailored to the
audience. Word choice is
vague or repetitive.
The purpose is generally
clear; the summary
expresses only the main
idea and most major points
of the original selection;
most of the writing is
tailored to the audience.
Word choice is fairly
concise.
The overall purpose of the
summary is clear; the
summary expresses only the
main idea and major points
of the original selection; the
writing is tailored to the
audience. Word choice is
consistently efficient and
concise.
Spelling, Mechanics,
and Grammar
There are serious errors in
mechanics, usage, grammar,
or spelling.
There are some errors in
mechanics, usage,
grammar, or spelling.
There are few or no errors in
mechanics, usage, grammar,
or spellingEDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 20
Graded Activity Six: Classroom Observation
Description of Activity:
The learner will be required to observe special education classrooms for a minimum of 3 class periods (1 hr LD, 1 hr,
EBD, 1 hr ASD: 3 hours total) and provide feedback on the classroom environment. The learner will observe how the
educator designs and manages positive instructional environments that convey high expectations for students to develop
their independence, self-motivation, self-direction, self-regulation, and self-advocacy. The learner will then design a
positive instructional environment plan for their own classroom that includes how to maintain high expectations for
students to develop their independence, self-motivation, self-direction, self-regulation, and self-advocacy.
Competencies Met:
This activity will ensure that you have met the following state standards:
CC7
Submission: Engage, Course Menu, Activities (attach)
Supplemental materials to be used for completion of activity:
Appendix 4
Points Possible: 10
Week Due: Week 8EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 21
Appendix 4 Observation Guide
Context for Learning/ Gradualism
Class Observed: ________________________________ Time Period __________________________
Discipline: _____________________________________ Date _______________________________
Context for Learning
a. Provide information about the context in which you teach so that another educator can
understand your teaching decisions for the instruction in the learning segment. Address the
following:
Type of setting (e.g., first grade classroom in an elementary school, self-contained
classroom, a home, a job site)
Your role in the focus learner(s)’ instructional program (e.g., teach all academic
subjects plus support a behavioral plan; pull out of general education classroom for
supplementary instruction in reading; coordinate services to the family and model
working with the focus learner)
The schedule for instructional time with the focus learner(s) for the learning segment
focus (e.g., Tuesdays for 15 minutes; every day for six hours with two hours on
reading instruction)
The primary language of instruction, if other than English (e.g., ASL)
b. Describe any district, school , or cooperating teacher, or student teaching requirements or expectations
that might affect your planning or instructional delivery (e.g., prescribed reading curriculum)
c. Identify any textbook or instructional program you primarily use for instruction for the learning
targets. If a textbook, please provide the title, publisher, and date of publication.
d. If group instruction, describe the size and composition of the group (e.g., 6 special education learners;
3 learners with IEPs and 23 general education learners).
e. If your teaching setting allows you to work with only one focus learner, describe what about the
setting prevents you from working with two learners.
Use the lesson plan template to document a lesson implemented by your host educator (fill out the lesson plan
as though you taught the lesson).EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 22
632 – Standards – Survey of Learners with Exceptionalities
Introduced
Introduced – CORE
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education understands the foundations of special education,
including information about students served by special education. The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of
the:
(4) definitions, characteristics, and educational implications for students with disabilities eligible for special education
services;
(6) impact of coexisting conditions, multiple disabilities, and gifts and the implications for the provision of
educational services;
(7) impact of gender, familial background, socioeconomic status, racial, cultural, and linguistic diversity on disabilities
and involvement in all aspects of special education;
(9) medical terminology and educational implications of medical conditions, including the effect of medication and
specialized health care in educational settings;
B. Referral, evaluation, planning, and programming. A teacher of special education understands and applies
principles of prevention and intervening early and procedures for referral, assessment, evaluation,
individualized planning, programming, and placement. The teacher must be able to:
(9) understand the effects of various physical and mental health conditions, including the effects of medications, on the
educational, cognitive, physical, social, and emotional behavior of individuals with disabilities when planning and
administering assessments;
C. Instructional design, teaching, and ongoing evaluation. A teacher of special education understands how to
provide and evaluate specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of students in special education
through individualized educational plans. The teacher must be able to:
(1) adapt and modify curriculum and deliver evidence-based instruction, including SRBI when available, aligned with
state and local grade-level content standards to meet individual learner needs;
D. Communication and collaboration. A teacher of special education cultivates and maintains positive,
collaborative relationships with children and youth, families, educators, other professionals, and the community
to support development and educational progress. The teacher must be able to:
(1) understand how disabilities can impact families as well as the student’s ability to learn, interact socially, and
contribute to the community throughout the life span;
Introduced – EBD
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education: emotional or behavioral disorders understands the
foundations of special education services for students with emotional or behavioral disorders on which to base
practice. The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of the:
(4) etiology, characteristics, and classifications of emotional behavioral disorders;
(6) impact of gender, familial background, socioeconomic status, cultural, and linguistic factors on perceptions and
interpretations of student behaviors;
(7) impact of co-existing conditions or multiple disabilities on behaviors and the similarities, differences, and
interactions between emotional or behavioral disorders and other disability areas and their effects on learning;
(8) impact of abuse and chemical dependency on students and their families;
(11) major mental health disorders manifested at different points across the lifespan and the implications for education;
C. Instructional design, teaching, and ongoing evaluation. A teacher of special education: emotional or
behavioral disorders understands how to use individualized education program plans to design, implement,
monitor, and adjust instruction for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. The teacher must be able
to:
(5) select, implement, evaluate, and modify evidence-based instructional strategies for social and emotional skills
development for students with emotional or behavioral disorders;
Introduced – ASD
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education: autism spectrum disorders understands the
foundations of special education services for students with autism spectrum disorders on which to base practice.
The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of the:
(6) etiology, early indicators, and core and associated characteristics of autism spectrum disorders, and their impact on
social interaction, communication, behavior, and learning;EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 23
(8) impact of co-existing conditions or multiple disabilities.
C. Instructional design, teaching, and ongoing evaluation. A teacher of special education: autism spectrum
disorders understands how to use individualized education program plans to design, implement, monitor, and
adjust instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders. The teacher must be able to:
(2) design, implement, monitor, and adjust evidence-based instructional methods and strategies to teach social,
communication, behavioral, academic, and functional skills that are age-and ability-appropriate across environments;
Introduced – LD
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education: learning disabilities understands the foundations
of special education services for students with learning disabilities and related learning difficulties on which to
base practice. The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of the:
(3) etiology and characteristics, including deficits in basic psychological processes, of specific learning disabilities and
related learning difficulties and the implications for learning and performance across ages and grade levels;
(4) impact of co-existing conditions or multiple disabilities;
(7) factors that influence accurate identification of culturally, linguistically, and socio-economically diverse students as
students with specific learning disabilities.
B. Referral, evaluation, planning, and programming. A teacher of special education: learning disabilities
understands and applies principles of prevention and intervening early and procedures for referral, assessment,
evaluation, individualized planning, programming, and placement specific to teaching students with learning
disabilities and related learning difficulties. The teacher must be able to:
(5) select, integrate, and interpret appropriate sources of data relevant for determining the needs of students and
compliance with legal requirements for eligibility, continuing service, transition services, and exit of special
education services;
C. Instructional design, teaching, and ongoing evaluation. A teacher of special education: learning
disabilities understands how to use individualized education program plans to design, implement, monitor, and
adjust instruction for students with learning disabilities and related learning difficulties. The teacher must be
able to:
(3) design, implement, monitor, and adjust instruction and supports to accelerate the rate of learning, provide
access to grade level content standards, promote social competence, and facilitate the transition to postsecondary
life;
(11) use individual and collective data to identify gaps and needs and to align instruction to grade level content
standards in guiding the selection and implementation of evidence-based practices for the purposes of classroom
and school-wide improvement.EDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 24
Practiced
Practiced – CORE
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education understands the foundations of special education,
including information about students served by special education. The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of
the:
(1) role of special education within the structure of a single, evolving and changing education system that provides,
based on an individualized planning and programming process, free appropriate public education to students in special
education through a continuum of services;
(4) definitions, characteristics, and educational implications for students with disabilities eligible for special education
services;
(5) similarities and differences among the cognitive, physical, sensory, cultural, social, emotional, behavioral, and
communication needs of individuals with and without disabilities and across different disabilities;
(6) impact of coexisting conditions, multiple disabilities, and gifts and the implications for the provision of
educational services;
(8) Rights and responsibilities of students, parents, teachers, other professionals, and schools related to students with
disabilities;
(9) medical terminology and educational implications of medical conditions, including the effect of medication and
specialized health care in educational settings;
(12) legal, judicial, medical, and educational systems and their terminologies and implications in serving students with
disabilities ;
(13) roles and organizational structures of general and special education and the part they play in providing total
services to all students
C. Instructional design, teaching, and ongoing evaluation. A teacher of special education understands how to
provide and evaluate specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of students in special education
through individualized educational plans. The teacher must be able to:
(1) adapt and modify curriculum and deliver evidence-based instruction, including SRBI when available, aligned with
state and local grade-level content standards to meet individual learner needs;
(7) design and manage positive instructional environments that convey high expectations for students to develop their
independence, self-motivation, self-direction, self-regulation, and self-advocacy;
(9) apply systematic procedures for compiling and using data for the purposes of continuous progress-monitoring,
modification of instruction, and program and school-wide improvement;
D. Communication and collaboration. A teacher of special education cultivates and maintains positive,
collaborative relationships with children and youth, families, educators, other professionals, and the community
to support development and educational progress. The teacher must be able to:
(7) provide consultation to and receive it from other professionals regarding specially designed instruction and program
organization and development for children and youth and families;
Practiced – EBD
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education: emotional or behavioral disorders understands the
foundations of special education services for students with emotional or behavioral disorders on which to base
practice. The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of the:
(4) etiology, characteristics, and classifications of emotional behavioral disorders;
(7) impact of co-existing conditions or multiple disabilities on behaviors and the similarities, differences, and
interactions between emotional or behavioral disorders and other disability areas and their effects on learning;
(13) legal provisions related to the juvenile justice, mental health, and educational systems including understanding
reporting mandates and confidentiality regulations; and
Practiced – ASD
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education: autism spectrum disorders understands the
foundations of special education services for students with autism spectrum disorders on which to base practice.
The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of the:
(6) etiology, early indicators, and core and associated characteristics of autism spectrum disorders, and their impact on
social interaction, communication, behavior, and learning;
(8) impact of co-existing conditions or multiple disabilities.
Practiced – LDEDSE 632
© Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 2016 25
A. Foundational knowledge. A teacher of special education: learning disabilities understands the foundations
of special education services for students with learning disabilities and related learning difficulties on which to
base practice. The teacher must demonstrate knowledge of the:
(4) impact of co-existing conditions or multiple disabilities;
(6) information regarding theories, research, medical terminology and implications, and legal requirements and their
relationship to education; and
The following outcomes will be practiced throughout the program and assessed in EDSE 698 (Research Methods) and
EDSE 699 (Action Research).
1. Frame vital questions clearly.
2. Evaluate relevant information and its sources.
3. Demonstrate respectful engagement with others’ ideas, behaviors, and beliefs.
4. Critique the incongruence between personal norms and ethical principles.
5. Apply diverse frames of reference to decisions and actions.
6. Resolve issues based on evidence weighed against relevant criteria.
7. Develop a subject, including relevance, logic, grasp of subject, and depth of discussion.
8. Communicate with clarity and coherence.
The following standards will be practiced throughout the program and will be assessed in the final presentation of EDSE
699 (Action Research).
Program Outcomes for the School of Graduate and Professional Programs
Frames vital questions clearly.
Evaluates relevant information and its sources.
Demonstrates respectful engagement with others’ ideas, behaviors, and beliefs.
Critiques the incongruence between personal norms and ethical principles.
Applies diverse frames of reference to decisions and actions.
Resolves issues based on evidence weighed against relevant criteria.
Develops a subject, including relevance, logic, grasp of subject, and depth of discussion.
Communicates with clarity and coherence.