1. There will be a 2,000 word essay that requires the critical analysis of a sports policy. This will account for 30% of the module mark. Critically compare ‘Game Plan’ and ‘Playing to Win’ sports policies from the perspective of the British tax payer. Within your answer you should consider the following areas of comparison, remembering to come back to the perspective of the British tax payer (i.e., which policy better serves the British tax payer). • Purpose (e.g., sport for all vs. elite sport development)? • Sport development vision (e.g., development of sport vs. development through sport) • Target groups • Context of the policy (i.e. what was happening when this policy was published) • Rationales (i.e., evidence to justify/support the policy) • Conflicting evidence (i.e., conflicting or lack of evidence for approach taken) You should conclude your essay by answering: • Which policy best serves the British tax payer? You should use an essay structure (introduction, main body, conclusion) and make use of AT LEAST 5 ACADEMIC REFERENCES that you appropriately reference in-text and in a reference list. You should refer to specific elements from the policies, including fully referenced quotes.