12/19/2016 ALEC ­ RubricBuilder https://app.secure.griffith.edu.au/alec/index.php?v=print_preview&a=3&rubric_id=33206 1/1 Rubric Builder Rubric 33206 Program Bachelor of Business Course Code 3019MKT Course Title Franchising & Small Business Semester Offering Trimester 1 2017 Assessment Task Due Diligence Presentation Assessment Weighting 25 Objective Name Criteria Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Oral Communication 5% Introduction Topic, key points and purpose of the presentation are introduced in a clear and interesting way which captures the audience's attention. Topic, key points and purpose of the presentation are introduced in a clear and interesting way. Topic, key points and purpose of the presentation are introduced with clarity. Topic introduced, but the introduction is underdeveloped in terms of key points and/or purpose of presentation. No topic, key points and/or purpose introduced ­ or the introduction is irrelevant to the task. Oral Communication 40% Knowledge of Due Diligence A thorough knowledge of due diligence has been demonstrated through your research. You have identified the key relevant concepts and have explained them very clearly. A good knowledge of due diligence has been demonstrated through your research. You have identified the majority of the relevant concepts and have explained them clearly. An adequate knowledge of due diligence has been demonstrated through your research. You have identified a number of relevant concepts and have explained them reasonably well. A superficial knowledge of due diligence has been demonstrated through your research. You have identified some of the relevant concepts and have explained them adequately. A lack of knowledge of due diligence has been demonstrated through your research. You have identified very few relevant concepts and have failed to communicate them clearly. Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 20% Ability to be able to compare due diligence strategies between independent small business and franchising. Excellent use of research skills to compare due diligence approaches for independent small business with franchising. Strong and compelling arguments have been made for both models. Very good use of research skills to compare due diligence approaches for independent small business with franchising. Reasonably strong arguments have been made for both models. Good use of research skills to compare due diligence approaches for independent small business with franchising. Sound arguments have been made for both models. Satisfactory research skills applied to compare due diligence approaches for independent small business with franchising. Shallow arguments have been made for both models. Inadequate research skills applied to compare due diligence approaches for independent small business with franchising. Weak arguments have been made for both models. Oral Communication 10% Organisation of presentation Information and ideas have been presented in a logical and interesting sequence which the audience can easily follow. Information and ideas have been presented in a structured manner which the audience can follow. Information and ideas have been presented with some degree of logic and structure but it is difficult for the audience to follow at times. Information and ideas could have been presented with better structure as it is often difficult for the audience to follow. Information and ideas have been illogically structured and presented, making it very difficult for the audience to follow. Oral Communication 5% Pace Presentation at a good pace, without any inappropriate pauses. Presentation at a good pace. Occasional inappropriate pauses but they do not detract from the audiences' understanding of the presentation. Too fast /slow or there are occasional inappropriate pauses that detract from the audiences' understanding of the presentation. Too fast/slow in some parts of the presentation or there are several inappropriate pauses that detract from the audiences' understanding of the presentation. Too fast/ slow throughout the presentation or there are several lengthy and inappropriate pauses that detract from the audiences' understanding of the presentation. Oral Communication 10% Visual Aids The visual aids are creative, well designed and confidently used, and they effectively support and add impact to the presentation. The visual aids are appropriate and well designed and they effectively support the presentation. The visual aids are useful in supporting the presentation. The visual aids are adequate but are sometimes not related to the message presented. No visual aids are used, the visual aids are poorly designed or they are largely unrelated to the message presented. Oral Communication 5% Voice Clear and convincing voice, is expressive throughout the presentation, and uses correct pronunciation of terms. Clear voice, is expressive throughout most of the presentation, with correct pronunciation of most terms. Clear voice, but is not expressive and/or pronounces some words incorrectly. Voice is not always clear or expressive with some incorrect pronunciations of terms. Mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, is not expressive Oral Communication 5% Conclusion and recommendation Clear and concise summary. Well­argued and convincing recommendation for audience. Clear and concise summary. Well developed recommendation for audience but could be more convincing. Reasonably clear summary. Adequate recommendation for audience but lacks authority. Adequate summary of the presentation. Recommendations could be stronger. No adequate conclusion to the presentation. Recommendations missing or inaccurate.