Need to write a literature review of NOT more than 2000 words. The review should demonstrate that the student has thoroughly researched their topic. Students should use examples of business practice from the scholarly journals papers, conferences, books and professional magazines to support their arguments. The literature review would be on an organisation (company) that is using accounting software packages in Australia. The research would cover: PART 1 1. The current organizational structure 2. What operational problems (e.g., inefficiency, errors) do you think the organisation could experience because of this structure? 3. What is the most likely system acquisition method— commercial software, custom software, or ERP? 4. Describes and prepare a system flowchart of the sales procedures for the chosen organisation (company) 5. Identify any control problems in the system and what sorts of fraud are possible in this system? PART 2 1. Development and adoption of the accounting software packages, 2. The current market size, 3. Identify the leaders in the market and what gives them the competitive advantage, 4. Identify the current gaps or challenges encountered by users or customers of accounting software/packages and make relevant suggestions or recommendations. Requirements: Research reports are to be presented in hard copy in size 12 Times New Roman or 10 Calibri Font and double spaced. The research should include a list of at least 5 references used in the research report and a bibliography of the wider reading done to familiarize oneself with the topic. Your research should be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your own words. All reports must use the Harvard referencing style. Marking rubrics are attached. Assessment Criteria: Score Very Good (15/15) Good (11/15) Satisfactory (9/15) Unsatisfactory (5/15) Presentation Information is well organized. Information is Information is Information is poorly and writing style Correct layout including times organized, Correct somewhat organized, Some new roman, font size 12 or layout including organized, Some elements of layout calibri, font size10, double times new roman, elements of layout or length incorrect. /15 marks spaced. About the right font size 12 or or length incorrect. length. calibri, font size10, Proper grammar and double spaced. Proper grammar punctuation not Very well written, excellent About the right and punctuation always used. paraphrasing and proper length. mostly used, but Excessive overuse of grammar and punctuation are overuse of direct direct quotes used throughout. Well written, some quotes. paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation Score Very Good (15/15) Good (11/15) Satisfactory (9/15) Unsatisfactory (5/15) Introduction Introduces the topic of the Introduces the topic Satisfactorily Introduces the topic research report in an of the research introduces the of the research extremely engaging manner report in an topic of the report, but omits a /15 marks which arouses the reader's engaging manner research report. general background interest. which arouses the of the topic and/or reader's interest. Gives a general Gives a detailed general background. the overall "plan" of background and indicates the Gives some general the report. overall "plan". background and Indicates the indicates the overall overall "plan" of "plan" of the report. the report. Score Very Good (20/20) Good (15/20) Satisfactory (10/20) Unsatisfactory (7/20) Evidence of Substantial range of Good range of Suitable range of Insufficient range or Research appropriate and current, appropriate and supportive number of supportive evidence current, supportive evidence used. Not supportive evidence /20 marks evidence. always appropriate used. and/or current. Minimum cited. Score Very Good (30/30) Good (23/30) Satisfactory (16/30) Unsatisfactory (10/30) Development of Logical, insightful, original Detailed, original Adequate Inadequate Discussion discussion with well- discussion develops discussion develops discussion of issues connected paragraphs. logically with some logically. and/or lacking in Evidence of full engagement connection between logical flow with the literature found, with adjoining Understanding of /30 marks relevant and detailed analysis. paragraphs. reading shown. Little/no Understanding of Few relevant demonstrated reading shown. analysis. understanding of Some relevant reading. analysis. None/little discussion or analysis. Score Very Good (10/10) Good (7/10) Satisfactory (5/10) Unsatisfactory (3/10) Conclusion An interesting, well written A good summary of Satisfactory Poor/no summary of summary of the main points. the main points. summary of the the main points. An excellent final comment on main points. A poor final /10 marks the subject, based on the A good final A final comment on comment on the information provided. comment on the the subject, but subject and/or new subject, based on introduced new material introduced. the information material. provided. Score Very Good (10/10) Good (7/10) Satisfactory (5/10) Unsatisfactory (3/10) Referencing Correct referencing (Harvard) Mostly correct Mostly correct Not all material All quoted material in quotes referencing referencing correctly and acknowledged. (Harvard) (Harvard) Some acknowledged. /10 marks problems with All paraphrased material All quoted material quoted material Some problems with acknowledged. in quotes and and paraphrased the reference list or acknowledged. All material bibliography. Correctly set out reference list paraphrased and bibliography included. material Some problems acknowledged. with the reference list or bibliography. Mostly correct setting out reference list and bibliography included. Total /100 marks Final marks /20 General Comments: