Prepared by: A/Prof Savitri Bevinakoppa Moderated by: Dr Khandakar Ahmed Nov, 2016 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code BN202 Unit Title Internetworking Technologies Assessment Type Assignment 2 - Individual, written and demonstration – T3 2016 Assessment Title Network design with configuration Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) Main objectives of this assignment is to enable student to configure networking devices for a given business case study and understand limitations of a network design. After successful completion of this assignment, students should be able to: a. Report on the health of existing internetworking architectures such as systems, solutions, data, applications, technology. b. Discuss an appropriate network design and solutions for medium-sized organisations. c. Report on the current and future state of the management of internetworking infrastructure and its applications. d. Interpret a roadmap process to transform an internetworking architecture to support long-term business goals. e. Apply a process to support the administration and the management of internetworking. Weight 20% of the total assessments Total Marks 50 Word limit 500 Due Date Week 11, demonstrate during laboratory class and submit report on Moodle Submission Guidelines  All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.  The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.  Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Extension  If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, on academic reception level. You must submit this application within three working days of the assessment due date. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-proceduresand-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Academic Misconduct  Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/aboutmit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/PlagiarismAcademic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.BN202 Internetworking Technologies Page 2 of 4 Prepared by: A/Prof Savitri Bevinakoppa Moderated by: Dr Khandakar Ahmed Nov, 2016 Assignment 2 Specification Business case study: Network design proposal for bank Description Assignment 2 is an extension of assignment 1 work. A network proposal has to be developed for a bank. The bank has a main office, which is located in London, and has 5 branch offices located at Paris, California, India, Dubai and Qatar. The bank has an application server, which is used by it's customers across the world for online transactions. All the branches have high speed internet connection. There are approximately 100 users in each of the branch offices and 200 users in the main office. Write a report with the following contents  Detailed Network Design in Netsim (You should not use packet tracer) which includes - Minimum of 2 switches - Minimum of 3 routers - VLAN - VTP - 2 PCs  Network device configurations a. Switch configuration: - Set IP addresses on PC and switch - Create VLAN - Ping each other - Set VTP domain with your first name - Set VTP password with your family name - Demonstrate VTP packets b. Router configuration - set descriptions on interfaces, one with your name, second with your family name, third with your middle name - display information about directly connected devices to router - Setup IP addresses for each interfaces - What is the subnet mask did you use? - Ping all 3 routers. Demonstrate working of whole network.BN202 Internetworking Technologies Page 3 of 4 Prepared by: A/Prof Savitri Bevinakoppa Moderated by: Dr Khandakar Ahmed Nov, 2016 Marking criteria Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Detailed Network Design in Netsim - Minimum of 2 switches - Minimum of 3 routers - VLAN - 2 PCs 6 Switch configuration - Set IP addresses on PC and switch - Create VLAN - Ping each other - Set VTP domain with your first name - Set VTP password with your family name - Demonstrate VTP packets 12 Router configuration - set descriptions on interfaces, one with your name, second with your family name, third with your middle name - display information about directly connected devices to router - Setup IP addresses for each interfaces - What is the subnet mask did you use? - Ping all 3 routers. 10 Demonstration Demonstrate switch and router configuration in week 11 laboratory class 16 Troubleshooting steps Write on problems occurred and how did you troubleshoot. 6 Total 50BN202 Internetworking Technologies Page 4 of 4 Prepared by: A/Prof Savitri Bevinakoppa Moderated by: Dr Khandakar Ahmed Nov, 2016 Marking Rubrics Grades Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Detailed Network Design in Netsim Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrate d ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Switch configuration Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed Router configuration Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed Troubleshooting steps All elements are present and very well integrated. Components present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well integrated Most components present Proposal lacks structure. Demonstration Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed IEEE Reference style Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors