SEJ101 – DESIGN PORTFOLIO Summative Assessment 1 In 2017 SEJ101 assessment will consist of nine tasks that will develop a portfolio of your assessed work. Throughout the trimester you will have the opportunity for feedback on all eight tasks before final submission. Some of the tasks will be quite straight forward others will be more complex. This assessment accounts for 50% of your entire grade for SEJ101, so it is well worth spending time on this task each and every week. The challenge for you is to design a physical artefact that is related to your discipline. So for civil engineers it can be a structural item like a concrete slab as part of a building or a road intersection, for mechatronic students it can be an electro-mechanical device. The product you design must have a minimum of five components. You will need to research the user of the product, materials and manufacturing technologies to produce the product and also apply professional standards such as dimensioning and tolerances. Portfolio examples will be presented throughout the entire trimester from a variety of sources. Design Portfolio Brief description of assessment task This individual assessment task is a design challenge, which requires students to progressively develop and submit a design portfolio. Students are required to showcase their design skills and abilities over the entire period of the trimester using the Portfolio tool in CloudDeakin, in particular their design strategies and approaches in developing a unique product as a contribution to the outcomes of the proposed project. Each student must present artefacts that demonstrate their technical and creative skills in design. Detail of student output This individual assessment task requires students to develop and present a design portfolio using the Portfolio tool in CloudDeakin. The design portfolio must emphasise approaches used in designing and developing a unique product and comprise of the follow items: • Concept Sketch • Pin / Mood / Inspiration Board • Mind Map • Information Sketch • Story Board • 2D Technical Drawings • 3D CAD Generated Models • 3D Rendered Images • Info-Graphic Weight (% total mark for unit) 50% Unit Learning Outcome(s) assessed ULO1, ULO2, ULO3 and ULO4 Deakin Graduate Learning Outcome(s) assessed GLO1, GLO3, GLO4 and GLO5 What early feedback will student get, how and when? Students will be given timely feedback for each individual portfolio item either through the seminar (in class or online), which will contribute to their progress. Feedback will be given from both academic mentors and peer discussion. Due date and form of submission Part 1 – by 11.59pm on 31/3/2017 Melbourne Time – Submitted via portfolio tool in Cloud Deakin (tasks include – Concept sketches – Pin Board – Mind Map – Info Sketch – Story Board) Part 2 – by 11.59pm on 2/6/2017 Melbourne Time - Submitted via portfolio tool in Cloud Deakin (Tasks Include – 2D Technical Drawings – 3D CAD – Rendered Images – InfoGraphic)Portfolio Task 1 – Idea/Concept Sketch Formative assessment – Week 2 studios Developed at a personal level to communicate an idea/concept quickly and effectively using simple shapes and lines. Can also be known as a napkin or back-of-the-envelope sketch. Details are minimal; the focus is on the image, just simple key words to list major features. Your portfolio should include: • 1 – 2 Concept sketches of each part in your design • 1 -2 sketches of the entire product assembled / layout • To be scanned and uploaded to the portfolio in JPEG formatPortfolio Task 2 – Pin / Mood / Inspiration Board Formative assessment – Week 3 studios Helps expand thoughts during the design process. It is a collection and curation process to organise and integrate ideas and thought through images. It is a technique used by many professional to refine thoughts and look at interesting features that other people have developed and be expaned upon. Applications such as Pinterest are a good digital version of a Pin / Mood / Inspiration Board. Your board should be a collection of no less than 25 ideas about your individual design; you also need to write a summary on why these images have influenced your design.Portfolio Task 3 – Mind Map Formative assessment – Week 3 studios Helps expand thoughts during the design process. It is a brain storming session on paper that is used to visually outline information. It is generally created around a single word / concept to which further words / concepts / implications of your design is added around. Your portfolio should include: • Rough (1st Draft) of Mind Map – scanned and uploaded in JPEG format • Final Version of Mind Map – saved and uploaded in PDF and JPEG formatPortfolio Task 4 – Information Drawings Formative assessment – Week 3 studios Combines the idea sketch and the mind map together to have a well-considered concept; using the information and preliminary research that has been gathered a multi-perspective drawing listing key features, functions and materials. It effectively communicates features, functions and materials through annotations and supporting graphics. Your portfolio should include: • 1 drawing per part - scanned and uploaded in jpeg format • 1 drawing of the entire assembly / layout – scanned and uploaded in jpeg format • Each drawing should have annotations highlighting features, materials and other important dataPortfolio Task 5 – Story Board Formative assessment – Week 5 studios Describes the interaction between your product and the user as well as putting it into a context. It is a series of small images that can be created via a variety of means (Bitstrips, Xtranormal or hand drawn). Concepts to be explored are why is there a need for your product? How will your product be used? What is the implication of your product and how will it benefit the user? Your portfolio should include: • Rough (1st draft) of story board with 6-8 cells – scanned and uploaded in jpeg format • Final version of story board with 6-8 cells – saved and uploaded in PDF and jpeg formatsPortfolio Task 6 – 2D Detailed Engineering Drawings Formative assessment – Week 6 studios There are several aspects to this task and needs to be done for your product assembly and each individual component: • A Perspective Drawing – a descriptive three-quarter view produced using a perspective drawing technique (CAD). It is a line drawing without the application of colour or tone. • General Arrangement Drawing – exterior view of all components using lines only and with sufficient details. This is usually drawn in third angle projection. • Detail Drawing – contains details of components for the manufacturing of your product. Can be known as a technical, production or construction drawing. Things like material specifications, surface finish, standards and tolerance will be addressed in these drawings. Your portfolio should include: • For each part a 3rd angle projection - All drawings will be properly: o Titled blocked o Dimensional tolerances o Material selections o References where needed • 2 – 3 drawings that include: o Assembly views o Plan views o Exploded views • All drawings to be uploaded in pdf and native CAD formatsPortfolio Task 7 – Detailed 3D models for Visualisation and Manufacturing Formative assessment – Week 7 studios There are several aspects to this task and needs to be done for your product assembly and each individual component: • Technical Illustration – communicates technical detail with a high degree of realism that is sometimes supported with symbols and includes exploded views. • Design Development Model – simple mock-ups (virtually) used to explore and visualise the relationships between components, cavities, interfaces and structures. Things like component interferences can be analysed in this model. • Appearance model – accurate virtual representation of product appearance, e.g. colour, surface finish, material selection. Your portfolio should include: • All native CAD files used to create your product • A pdf upload of each part and assembly filePortfolio Task 8 – Rendered 2D / 3D CAD models Formative assessment – Week 8 Studios Contains a high level of visual realism to fully define the product appearance as a perspective of view. Concepts like augmented reality and superposition can be explored; this task is especially useful for decision makers who are not designers / engineers in exploring products and concepts. Your portfolio should include: • A minimum of 3 views of assembly or plan of your design with colour and texture added to highlight the features / aspects / context of your design • To be uploaded in jpeg formatPortfolio Task 9 – Info graphic Formative assessment – Week 9 Studios With basic research that was done in Task 2 combined with images produced in Task 7 an information graphic (info-graphic) is to be developed. The main purpose of the info-graphic is a visual representation of information or data in an easy to digest format for the non-designer or lay person. It generates context and situational awareness of the product. “A good info-graphic is worth a thousand words” Your portfolio should include: • Rough (1st draft) version of your infographic – scanned and uploaded in jpeg format • Final version of your infographic – saved and uploaded in pdf and jpeg formatAssessment 1 Rubric Worth 50% of your overall grade for SEJ101 – rubric is graded over 100 points Task / Item Excellent Advanced Proficient Acceptable Unacceptable Idea Sketches 5/100 • A clear sketch displaying several angles of the idea that effectively communicates the concept to a wide audience • Has a plan / assembly sketch • Has 5 from 5 part / component sketches • A sketch displaying several angles of the idea that communicates the concept to an audience • Has a plan / assembly sketch • Has 5 from 5 individual part / component sketches • A sketch that shows one angle and communicates the concept satisfactorily • Has a plan / assembly sketch • Has the 3 from 5 individual part / component sketches • A sketch/s that is limited in communicating effectively the product • Has only a assembled / full product sketch • Does not have individual part sketches • A sketch that does not communicate the product Mind Map 5/100 • A detailed map that takes into consideration various aspects of the product including user analysis, variation and manufacturing, functionality and integration with objects and other surrounding products • 4 or more branches with details • Good evidence and idea progression between the 1st and final version • A mind map that takes into consideration aspects of the product including user analysis, variation and manufacturing, functionality and integration with objects and other surrounding products • 4 or more branches with details • Good evidence and idea progression between the 1st and final version • A mind map that takes into consideration limited aspects of the product and integration with objects and other surrounding products • 4 or less branches have detail • Limited evidence between the 1st and final version • A mind map that takes into consideration minimal aspects of the design • 2 or less branches have detail • No evidence of iteration between the 1st and final version • A map that takes into consideration minimal aspects • No evidence of iteration between 1st and final version Pin / Mood / Inspiration Board 5/100 • Comprehensive collection of images that support your design direction • Consists on more than 25 images • An excellent and comprehensive summary of how these images influenced and contributed to your design • Coherent collection of images that support your design direction • Consists on more than 25 images • A comprehensive summary of how these images influenced and contributed to your design • Coherent collection of images that support your design direction • Consists on more than 20 images • A comprehensive summary of how these images influenced and contributed to your design • A good collection of images that support your design direction • Consists on more than 15 images • A good summary of how these images influenced and contributed to your design • A collection of images that support your design direction • Consists on more than 10 images • A summary of how these images influenced and contributed to your design Information Drawings 10/100 • An information drawing of the entire product • All individual part drawings • Excellent progression from mind map and outside resources. • Lists all features • An information drawing of the entire product • All individual part drawings • Good links between the mind map, outside resources and lists all features • An information drawing of the entire product • All individual part drawings • Limited details, limited references to mind map, features and outside resources • An information drawing is only of the entire product • No individual drawings of parts • Limited details, minimal or no references to mind map, features and outside resources • Limited communication of components from the product. • Limited or no details referencing features and mind mapStory Board 5/100 • Describes the product, features and functions with excellent detail • The reader has no question on how this product can be used • Describes the product, features and functions with good detail • Gives the reader good context on how the product can be used • Describes the product and functions and features can be used • Give the reader some context for the product • Describes the product and how functions / features might be used. • It gives the reader a limited context for the product. • Fails to adequately describe the product and give it a sense of context for its use 2D CAD – individual part drawings 20/100 • Contains details of each component showing features such as tolerances, bill of materials, material specs and surface finishes as needed. • Is of high enough quality to be given to a trades person for manufacture • Contains details of each component showing features such as tolerances, bill of materials, material specs and surface finishes as needed. • Is of good enough quality to be given to a trades person for manufacture • Contains details of each component showing features such as tolerances, bill of materials, material specs and surface finishes as needed. • Is of enough quality to be given to a trades person for manufacture with minimal questions • Contains details of each component showing features such as tolerances, bill of materials, material specs and surface finishes as needed. • Is a good attempt and could be given to a trades person for manufacture with questions • Fails to adhere to engineering design standards, does not included important data like all dimension, materials and tolerances 2D CAD – assembly / plan / exploded view drawings 15/100 • Communicates technical details with a high degree of realism that is supported with arrows and symbols to show how the product is assembled. • It must show all components and may extend over several drawings to a high quality standard. • Communicates technical details with a good degree of realism that is supported with arrows and symbols to show how the product is assembled. • It must show all components and may extend over several drawings to a good quality standard. • Communicates technical details with an average degree of realism that is supported with arrows and symbols to show how the product is assembled. • It must show all components and may extend over several drawings to an average quality standard. • Communicates technical details with an average degree of realism that is supported with arrows and symbols to show how the product is assembled. • It must show all components and may extend over several drawings to an average quality standard. • Fails to adhere to engineering design standards. • Does not convey an accurate representation of the artefact or product. 3D CAD 20/100 • A high quality virtual mock-up used to explore and visualise the relationships between components, cavities, interfaces and structures. • Several different assembly features are used. • Model/s are built with an excellent level of integration and continuity • A good quality virtual mock-up used to explore and visualise the relationships between components, cavities, interfaces and structures. • Several different assembly features are used. • Model/s are built with a high level of integration and continuity • An average quality virtual mock-up used to explore and visualise the relationships between components, cavities, interfaces and structures. • Limited assembly features are used. • Model/s are built with thought into model integration • A below average quality virtual mock-up used to explore and visualise the relationships between components, cavities, interfaces and structures. • Limited assembly features are used. • Model/s are built with some thought into model integration • A poor quality virtual mock-up used to explore and visualise the relationships between components, cavities, interfaces and structures. • Limited or no assembly features are used. • Model/s are built hap-hazard with little thought into model construction 2D / 3D rendered images 5/100 • Contains a high level of realism to fully define product appearance as a perspective and other views. • More than four viewpoints are presented in excellent detail • Contains a good level of realism to define product appearance as a perspective and other views. • More than three viewpoints are presented in good detail • Contains an average level of realism to define product appearance as a perspective and views. • Only one or two viewpoints are presented in good detail • Contains an indication of realism to define product appearance as a perspective and views. • Only one or two viewpoints are presented • Fails to indicate a level of realism to define product appearance as a perspective and views. Infographic 10/100 • Presents the product and its main features quickly and links highly relevant data to the reader. • The reader/s finds it interesting and has highly reliable data. • It’s a highly visual story to deliver the underlying message and has links to further sources of high quality information. • Presents the product and the majority features quickly and links highly relevant data to the reader. • The reader/s finds it interesting and has reliable data. • It’s a good visual story to deliver the underlying message and has links to further sources of quality information. • Presents the product and the some features quickly and links relevant data to the reader. • It’s an average visual story to deliver the message and has links to further sources of information. • Presents the product and the limited features quickly and links data to the reader. • It’s a good attempt at a visual story to deliver the message and has limited links to further sources of information. • Fails to presents the product and the limited features quickly and doesn’t link the data to the reader. • A poor attempt at a visual story to deliver the message and has limited / no links to further sources of information.