PPMP20008 Assessment 3: Requirements, Quality and Cost Assessment 3 You are to develop a requirements management plan, quality management plan, cost management plan; and a cost baseline including funding requirements. These are four separate documents, they need to be reflective of the project described in the selected tender and align to the requirements of the PMBoK and Prince2. Title Page Include a title page at the beginning of each assessment item with the following information: • Student name(include names of all students in group for group assessments – 2, 3 & 5) • Student number (include number of all students in group for group assessments) • The project domain and name • The document name (e.g. Charter, Scope Baseline etc.) Criteria You are required to apply your knowledge of project management concepts when developing the four documents mentioned in the criteria below. Make sure you develop the document described as if you were planning the project. Do not submit a report discussing what that document is. Assessment Criteria Allocated marks Appropriate application of the following project management concepts in the development of the following documents for the project described in the selected tender. 1 The project management concepts within the requirements management plan are applied appropriately and the requirements management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. 5 2 The project management concepts within the quality management plan are applied appropriately and the quality management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. 5 3 The project management concepts within the cost management plan are applied appropriately and the cost management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender is complete and reflects the case. 5 4 The project management concepts within the cost baseline are applied appropriately and the cost baseline is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender is complete and reflects the case. 5 Total Marks 20 Ensure your submissions are submitted in an appropriate format, are concise, demonstrate clarity of expression, and correct grammar and spelling. Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant. Assessment 3 Marking Rubric 0 marks 1 mark 2 marks 3 marks 4 marks 5 marks The following rubric relates to the ‘document’ listed in each of the assessment criteria and should be read in conjunction with the criteria. Note: Referencing must be included in the project documents, including referencing tender documents. The rubric refers to poor referencing. The absence of references may be taken to be plagiarism and could result in academic misconduct penalties being applied. The document was not supplied and/or what was provided did not relate to the assessment. The document is neither clear nor easy to understand. Less than 25% of the project management concepts within the document are included and/or appropriate application was demonstrated in less than 25% of the required concepts. The document is a reasonably accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Improvements may be required in the formatting, referencing, grammar and/or spelling. If so the student should seek assistance from the ALC. Between 25% and 50% of the project management concepts within the document are included and/or appropriate application was demonstrated in between 25% and 50% of the required concepts. The document is a reasonably accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Improvements may be required in the formatting, referencing, grammar and/or spelling. If so the student should seek assistance from the ALC. The project management concepts within the document are mostly included and/or appropriate application was demonstrated in the majority of the required concepts. The document is a reasonably accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Formatting, referencing, grammar and spelling are reasonable, some improvements may be needed. The project management concepts within the document are all included and any errors in application are few and minor. The document is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Formatting, referencing, grammar and spelling are well done. Any issues are few and minor. The project management concepts within the document are all included and correctly applied. The document is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Formatting, referencing, grammar and spelling are excellent. Any issues could be interpreted as typographical in nature and are rare within the document. Cost Baseline and Funding Requirements Information You are to provide the cost baseline and the funding requirements using separate tables within a single documents. Please refer to the information provided in the Week 4 lecture materials and any feedback provided on the summary budget in your Charter submission. If you are utilising the information within your Charter please include a reference to it at the bottom of the documents. The cost baseline is to be provided against activities on a time line, you must include the total and cumulative total in your submission. The following slide is an example of what is expected: The funding requirements are to be included in a separate table. Funding is not normally provided at equal time periods but usually when the project passes through predetermined gates. The Funding requirements also include management reserves which are not included in the cost baseline. The following slide is an example of what is expected. Please note the information in the funding requirements provided in this example does not relate to the project for which the cost baseline example was provided. Check your work to ensure the two tables align. COST MANAGEMENT PLAN Version Number: 1.0 Version Date: Insert other necessary information including student names, numbers, tutor etc. Notes to the Author [This document is a template of a Quality Management Plan document for a project. The template includes instructions to the author and fields that should be replaced with the values specific to the project. It has been tailored to suit the assessment. • Blue italicized text provides an explanation of what should be included for each section. Remove this text prior to submission. Where there are two options for you to decide between, revert the option you are keeping to black and remove the other. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Application of plan 3 2 COST DESCRIPTORS 3 2.1 Units of Measure 3 2.2 Level of Precision 3 2.3 Level of Accuracy 3 3 ORGANISATIONAL PROCEDURES LINKS 3 4 CONTROL THRESHOLDS 3 5 RULES OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT 3 5.1 Cost Management Measurement 3 5.2 Timing of Cost Management Activities 3 5.3 Reporting 3 COST MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVAL 4 REFERENCES 5 APPENDIX C: KEY TERMS 6 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 APPLICATION OF PLAN This Cost Management Plan applies to the Organisational / Program / Project costs. [Decide which level of cost the Cost Management Plan will apply to and delete the other...] 2 COST DESCRIPTORS 2.1 UNITS OF MEASURE [Define the unit of measure of the cost of the project. E.g. Specific currency etc.] 2.2 LEVEL OF PRECISION [Degree of rounding of cost estimates] 2.3 LEVEL OF ACCURACY [Acceptable range in determining cost estimates] 3 ORGANISATIONAL PROCEDURES LINKS [PMBOK Guide pg. 199 provides an example of this, other examples could include how the portfolio funding cycle and procedures, the cost acquittal procedures etc. You will need to provide one example with a description of the procedure that demonstrates your understanding of the concept. Therefore if you used the example of the Portfolio Funding Procedure, you would then go on to briefly describe that and the importance or link to the project. 4 CONTROL THRESHOLDS [Variance thresholds for monitoring costs]. 5 RULES OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT 5.1 COST MANAGEMENT MEASUREMENT [Describe what cost performance measures will be used to determine the performance in relation to cost management during the project.]] 5.2 TIMING OF COST MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES States when formal cost management activities – include activities that will align to the Organisational cost management timings. 5.3 REPORTING [Describe how, when, in what format and to who the cost performance of the project will be reported.] Cost Management Plan Approval The undersigned acknowledge that they have reviewed the Cost Management Plan and agree with the information presented within this document. Changes to this Cost Management Plan will be coordinated with, and approved by, the undersigned, or their designated representatives. [HINT – there are at least four signatures required, three sit on the same governance structure.] Signature: Date: Print Name: Title: Role: Signature: Date: Print Name: Title: Role: Signature: Date: Print Name: Title: Role: Signature: Date: Print Name: Title: Role: REFERENCES [Include your reference list and ensure that you have used in-text referencing as per the Harvard Referencing style.] APPENDIX C: KEY TERMS The following table provides definitions and explanations for terms and acronyms relevant to the content presented within this document. Term Definition [Insert Term] QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Version Number: 1.0 Version Date: Insert other necessary information including student names, numbers, tutor etc. Notes to the Author [This document is a template of a Quality Management Plan document for a project. The template includes instructions to the author and fields that should be replaced with the values specific to the project. It has been tailored to suit the assessment. • Blue italicized text provides an explanation of what should be included for each section. Remove this text prior to submission. Where there are two options for you to decide between, revert the option you are keeping to black and remove the other. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1.1 This Quality Plan applies to Management / Specialist Products 4 2 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE 4 2.1.1 Quality Standards 4 2.1.2 Quality Metrics 4 3 QUALITY TOOLS, TECHNIQUES & RECORDS 4 3.1.1 Quality Tools and Techniques 4 3.2 Records 4 3.2.1 Project Quality Register 4 3.3 Reporting 4 3.4 Timing of Quality Management Activities 4 3.5 Roles & Responsibilities 4 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVAL 6 REFERENCES 7 APPENDIX C: KEY TERMS 8 6 INTRODUCTION 6.1.1 Application of plan This Quality Plan applies to Management / Specialist Products [Prince2 categorizes project products into ‘Specialist Products’ and ‘Management Products’. Decide which category of product the Quality Management Plan will apply to and delete the other. Ensure you understand what the definitions of each are before making a determination.] 7 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE 7.1 QUALITY STANDARDS [Identify the quality standards that will apply to this project. In this section provide a quality standard for a user group, an industry body and government legislation/regulation] 7.1.1 Quality Metrics [Identify a quality metric for one of the standards identified above] 7.2 QUALITY TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES [Identify two quality tools or techniques and describe how it could be used in the project.] Tool Description [Benchmarking] [Industry recognized benchmarks] In the description be specific in terms of how you will use the tool or technique in your project. 7.3 RECORDS 7.3.1 Project Quality Register [Note the purpose, of this document, how it will be stored and who is responsible for creating it. 8 QUALITY GOVERNANCE AND TIMING 8.1 REPORTING [Describe how quality management is reported - make this simple – you could state that they are reported in the status report (also known as highlight or project progress report), you will also need to the timing of the reporting and who are the recipients of the report] 8.2 TIMING OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES States when formal quality management activities – include activities that will align to the Organizational quality management timings. 8.3 ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES [Complete the table below by filling in the fields that are missing – The table describes the primary responsibilities for each role relating to the practice of Quality Management for the project. Indicate responsibilities for activities such as mentoring or coaching, auditing work products, auditing processes, participating in project reviews, etc. Look at the Quality chapter in Prince2.] Name Role Key Quality Responsibility [John Doe] Confirms acceptance of the project product. Provide resources to undertake user quality activities and product approvals. Senior Supplier Provide resources to undertake supplier quality activities. Project Manager Work Package Team Manager Independent reviewer / Product Producer (Delete which one is incorrect) Reviews Quality of the Product/s Quality Management Plan Approval The undersigned acknowledge that they have reviewed the Quality Management Plan and agree with the information presented within this document. Changes to this Quality Management Plan will be coordinated with, and approved by, the undersigned, or their designated representatives. [HINT – there are at least four signatures required, three sit on the same governance structure.] Signature: Date: Print Name: Title: Role: Signature: Date: Print Name: Title: Role: Signature: Date: Print Name: Title: Role: Signature: Date: Print Name: Title: Role: REFERENCES [Include your reference list and ensure that you have used in-text referencing as per the Harvard Referencing style.] APPENDIX C: KEY TERMS The following table provides definitions and explanations for terms and acronyms relevant to the content presented within this document. Term Definition [Insert Term] Assessment 3 (2017 T1) Requirements Management Plan (RMP) ‘Information and templates Please read the following information. You will need to use the information to fill out the template for your specific project. Only submit the template – delete all other information. Scenario As the project manager you are not a member of the Project Board, but you do attend meetings to provide the members with status reports and to provide information on certain items on the agenda. The Board approved the Charter at the March meeting. At that meeting the Board asked you to complete the scope baseline and send it out of session. The secretary emailed you a week later and stated that the Board Members were happy with the progress on scope, however have not approved the baseline as there is some changes they want you to make. You emailed the secretary back and ask if he can send you specific details of the changes. NOTE: Please refer to the information and template for your specific project. . You must include a title page at the front of the template when submitting. Project specific RMP information and templates QUOTA PARK FOOTPATH PROJECT 2 MUSEUMS VICTORIA E-PROCUREMENT SYSTEM PROJECT 5 MANAGEMENT SERVICES - MOOLOOLABA BEACH HOLIDAY PARK PROJECT 8 BERRINBA EAST STATE SCHOOL OSHC PROJECT 11 9 QUOTA PARK FOOTPATH PROJECT This is the reply that you receive from the secretariat for the Quota Park Footpath Project Board: As the project manager for the Quota Park Footpath Project the following action has been raised by the Project Board out of session. 20170404_QPF_A01 Requirements Management Plan - Acknowledging Traditional Owners. The Project Executive has added that both the Department of Roads and Transport and the Mackay Regional Council want to include within the work of this project, a permanent feature to acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the Land of which the footpath will be build. The feature does not necessarily have to be on the footpath, however would need to be visible for those using the footpath. The Senior User noted that they cannot represent this user group. As further information is required to understand the requirements relating to this a requirements management plan specifically for this is to be developed for the next Board meeting. Given the time constraints the Project Board have agreed to the completion of a tailored Requirements Management Plan, which has significantly reduced information than what would normally be required in such a plan and concentrates specific information sort by the board members. The Template for this is attached. When completing the Requirements Management Plan. You are to include information as per the template. The Board has asked that you use in-text referencing and include a reference list as per Harvard Referencing style, so they can clarify the source of the information and seek further detail from the source if necessary. You are also to delete any explanatory text or question which has been provided as blue italicised text in the template. Please also delete the inappropriate option within the heading of section 1.3.   Requirements Management Plan Template Acknowledging Traditional Owners. Quota Park Footpath Project 1. Planning the requirement activities (Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. To complete this section please provide answers to the questions below) 1.1 Traditional Owners of Australia Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. QUESTION - Who is the Project Executive referring to as the Traditional Owners of Australia? 1.2 Additional Senior User/s Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. You are told to identify a Senior User who can represent the Traditional Owners of the land in which the footpath is being built. QUESTION - Is there a difference between Traditional Owners of the land in which the footpath is being built and Traditional Owners of Australia? Explain your answer. 1.3 Wording of ‘Welcome to Country’ or ‘Acknowledgement of Country’ (Please delete the option that is not appropriate from the heading prior to submission and revert text colour of appropriate option to black). Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Project Executive would like you to provide here the wording for them to use when opening meetings. They are not sure if it should be a Welcome to Country or an Acknowledgement of Country. The Project Executive is not of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent. QUESTION - Which of the two welcoming styles is appropriate for the Project Executive to use. Provide a script of the appropriate wording, and an explanation of your choice. 1.4 Requirements gathering for options analysis Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Senior Supplier has noted that one of their lead designers has previously designed the information board for the Local Greek Community Club and could put together a similar design based on information she can research online. This desk top requirements gathering and design would save both time and money, as there would be no need contact anyone outside the current project team. QUESTION – Is this an appropriate method of requirements gathering? Explain your answer. 2. Requirement Priority Process - MoSCoW technique Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Senior Supplier wants to be clear on what principles should be considered when prioritising any requirements that are gathered for this work. They have suggested using the MoSCoW Principle. QUESTION - Describe the MoSCoW technique References Name, Position, Organisation Signature Project Executive Senior Supplier Senior User Project Manager   10 MUSEUMS VICTORIA E-PROCUREMENT SYSTEM PROJECT This is the reply that you receive from the secretariat for the Museums Victoria E-Procurement System Project Board: As the project manager for the Museums Victoria E-Procurement System Project the following action has been raised by the Project Board out of session. 20170410_MVePS_A01 Requirements Management Plan – Access and Connectivity Indigenous Knowledge Partners. The Senior User noted that the procurement team within Museums Victoria would like to ensure the project is in no way unfairly disadvantaging businesses that may not have access to the required technology including but not limited to connectivity issues. Specifically they are concerned with the both existing and potential partnerships with businesses located in rural and remote Australia which are run by the Traditional Owners of the land in which these businesses are located. The Senior User noted that they cannot represent this user group. As further information is required to understand this issue, a Requirements Management Plan specifically is to be developed for the next Board meeting. Given the time constraints the Project Board have agreed to the completion of a tailored Requirements Management Plan, which has significantly reduced information than what would normally be required in such a plan and concentrates specific information sort by the board members. The Template for this is attached. When completing the Requirements Management Plan. You are to include information as per the template. The Board has asked that you use in-text referencing and include a reference list as per Harvard Referencing style, so they can clarify the source of the information and seek further detail from the source if necessary. You are also to delete any explanatory text or question which has been provided as blue italicised text in the template. Please also delete the inappropriate option within the heading of section 1.3.   Requirements Management Plan Template Access and Connectivity Indigenous Knowledge Partners. Museums Victoria E-Procurement System Project 1 Planning the requirement activities Additional requirements resulting from this process must be progressed through formal change management procedures. Once approved the following project documents are to be updated: List two project documents that might have to be updated (e.g. the scenario has provided information relating to a scope change that could potentially impact cost, timing, scope etc. Please note you will not have to make the change to documents for the assessments. 1.1 Traditional Owners. Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. Who are the Traditional Owners of Australia? 1.2 Additional Senior User/s Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The current Senior User states that it may be inappropriate to only have one other Senior User representing the Traditional Owners of Australia. QUESTION - Explain why it may be inappropriate to have only one Senior User representing the Traditional Owners of Australia. 1.3 Wording of ‘Welcome to Country’ or ‘Acknowledgement of Country’ (Please delete the option that is not appropriate from the heading prior to submission and revert text colour of appropriate option to black). Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Project Executive would like you to provide here the wording for them to use when opening meetings. They are not sure if it should be a Welcome to Country or an Acknowledgement of Country. The Project Executive is not of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent. QUESTION - Which of the two welcoming styles is appropriate for the Project Executive to use. Provide a script of the appropriate wording, and an explanation of your choice. 1.4 Requirements gathering for options analysis Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Senior Supplier has noted that one of their lead designers has previously designed an E-procurement system for the Local Greek Community Club and could put together a similar design based on information she can research online. This desk top requirements gathering and design would save both time and money, as there would be no need contact anyone outside the current project team. QUESTION – Is this an appropriate method of requirements gathering? Explain your answer. 2. Requirement Priority Process MoSCoW Principle Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Senior Supplier wants to be clear on what principles should be considered when prioritising any requirements that are gathered for this work. They have suggested using the MoSCoW Principle. QUESTION - Describe the MoSCoW technique References Name, Position, Organisation Signature Project Executive Senior Supplier Senior User Project Manager   11 MANAGEMENT SERVICES - MOOLOOLABA BEACH HOLIDAY PARK PROJECT This is the reply that you receive from the secretariat for the Management Services - Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project Board: As the project manager for the Management Services - Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project the following action has been raised by the Project Board out of session. 20170408_MSMBH_A01 Requirements Management Plan - Acknowledging Traditional Owners. The Project Executive has added that the Sunshine Coast Council want to include within the work of this project, replacement of signage within the park. The new signage is to have both English and the language of the Traditional Owners of the land in which the Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park is located. The intent of the signage is to acknowledge and show respect to the Traditional Owners of the Land. The Senior User noted that they cannot represent the Traditional Owners. As further information is required to understand the requirements relating to this request, a Requirements Management Plan specifically is to be developed for the next Board meeting. Given the time constraints the Project Board have agreed to the completion of a tailored Requirements Management Plan, which has significantly reduced information than what would normally be required in such a plan and concentrates specific information sort by the board members. The Template for this is attached. When completing the Requirements Management Plan you are to include information as per the template. The Board has asked that you use in-text referencing and include a reference list as per Harvard Referencing style, so they can clarify the source of the information and seek further detail from the source if necessary. You are also to delete any explanatory text or question which has been provided as blue italicised text in the template. Please also delete the inappropriate option within the heading of section 1.3.   Requirements Management Plan Template Acknowledging Traditional Owners. Management Services - Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project 1. Planning the requirement activities (Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. To complete this section please provide answers to the questions below) 1.1. Traditional Owners of Australia Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. QUESTION - Who is the Project Executive referring to as the Traditional Owners of Australia? 1.2 Additional Senior User/s Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. You are told to identify a Senior User who can represent the Traditional Owners of the land in which the footpath is being built. QUESTION - Is there a difference between Traditional Owners of the land in which the Holiday Park is located and Traditional Owners of Australia? Explain your answer. 1.3 Wording of ‘Welcome to Country’ or ‘Acknowledgement of Country’ (Please delete the option that is not appropriate from the heading prior to submission and revert text colour of appropriate option to black). Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Project Executive would like you to provide here the wording for them to use when opening meetings. They are not sure if it should be a Welcome to Country or an Acknowledgement of Country. The Project Executive is not of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent. QUESTION - Which of the two welcoming styles is appropriate for the Project Executive to use. Provide a script of the appropriate wording, and an explanation of your choice. 1.4 Requirements gathering for options analysis Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Senior Supplier has noted that one of their lead designers has previously designed signage for the Local Greek Community Club and could put together a similar design based on information she can research online. This desk top requirements gathering and design would save both time and money, as there would be no need contact anyone outside the current project team. QUESTION – Is this an appropriate method of requirements gathering? Explain your answer. 2. Requirement Priority Process - MoSCoW technique Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Senior Supplier wants to be clear on what principles should be considered when prioritising any requirements that are gathered for this work. They have suggested using the MoSCoW Principle. QUESTION - Describe the MoSCoW technique References Name, Position, Organisation Signature Project Executive Senior Supplier Senior User Project Manager   12 BERRINBA EAST STATE SCHOOL OSHC PROJECT This is the reply that you receive from the secretariat for the Berrinba East State School OSHC Project Board: As the project manager for the Berrinba East State School OSHC Project the following action has been raised by the Project Board out of session. 20170409_BESSOSHC_A01 Requirements Management Plan – Cultural Awareness The Project Executive has added that the Department of Education want to include within the work of this project, Cultural Awareness training for all staff working with the service. The intent is to ensure that staff are aware, acknowledge and respect the Traditional Owners of the Land of which the Berrinba East State School OSHC service will be located. The Senior User noted that they cannot represent the Traditional Owners. As further information is required to understand the requirements relating to this request, a requirements management plan is to be developed for the next Board meeting. Given the time constraints the Project Board have agreed to the completion of a tailored Requirements Management Plan, which has significantly reduced information than what would normally be required in such a plan and concentrates specific information sort by the board members. The Template for this is attached. When completing the Requirements Management Plan you are to include information as per the template. The Board has asked that you use in-text referencing and include a reference list as per Harvard Referencing style, so they can clarify the source of the information and seek further detail from the source if necessary. You are also to delete any explanatory text or question which has been provided as blue italicised text in the template. Please also delete the inappropriate option within the heading of section 1.3.   Requirements Management Plan Template Cultural Awareness Berrinba East State School OSHC Project 1 Planning the requirement activities (Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. To complete this section please provide answers to the questions below) 1.1 Traditional Owners of Australia Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. QUESTION - Who is the Project Executive referring to as the Traditional Owners of Australia? 1.2 Additional Senior User/s Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. You are told to identify a Senior User who can represent the Traditional Owners of the land in which the Berrinba East State School is located. QUESTION - Is there a difference between Traditional Owners of the land in which the School is located and Traditional Owners of Australia? Explain your answer. 1.3 Wording of ‘Welcome to Country’ or ‘Acknowledgement of Country’ (Please delete the option that is not appropriate from the heading prior to submission and revert text colour of appropriate option to black). Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Project Executive would like you to provide here the wording for them to use when opening meetings. They are not sure if it should be a Welcome to Country or an Acknowledgement of Country. The Project Executive is not of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent. QUESTION - Which of the two welcoming styles is appropriate for the Project Executive to use. Provide a script of the appropriate wording, and an explanation of your choice. 1.4 Requirements gathering for options analysis Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Senior Supplier has noted that one of their lead trainers has previously designed the Greek Cultural Training for the Local Greek Community Club and could put together a similar training package based on information she can research online. This desk top requirements gathering and design would save both time and money, as there would be no need contact anyone outside the current project team. QUESTION – Is this an appropriate method of requirements gathering? Explain your answer. 2. Requirement Priority Process - MoSCoW technique Delete explanatory text and questions prior to submitting to the Project Board. The Senior Supplier wants to be clear on what principles should be considered when prioritising any requirements that are gathered for this work. They have suggested using the MoSCoW Principle. QUESTION - Describe the MoSCoW technique References Name, Position, Organisation Signature Project Executive Senior Supplier Senior User Project Manager 12.1.1.1 Practical Assessment Assessment Title Requirements, Quality and Cost Task Description Assignment Overview This assessment item requires you to develop :- • requirements management plan, • quality management plan, • cost management plan, • cost baseline and funding requirements, …you must then develop the items listed above for a selected case study. The case studies will cover a number of project domains:- • Engineering and construction domain, • IT Telecoms Software domain, • Financial and business services domain, • Welfare domain. Your submissions must meet the minimum requirement outlined in the PMBOK (2013) and conform to the requirements outlined PRINCE2 (2009). Task Your task is to consider the overview above and develop and complete the required items. You will be graded upon how well your submissions have been completed and reflect the case studies. Purpose This assessment item is to assist you to understand and develop skills in the contents and compilation of project requirements, quality and cost management. The assignment will also give you the opportunity to enhance your analysis and written communication skills; particularly in the areas of structured assignment writing. Assessment Criteria Your assignment will be assessed on the extent and quality to which it meets each of the following criteria. 1. The project management concepts within the requirements management plan are applied appropriately and the requirements management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender (5 marks) 2. The project management concepts within the quality management plan are applied appropriately and the quality management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender (5 marks) 3. The project management concepts within the cost management plan are applied appropriately and the cost management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender is complete and reflects the case (5 marks) 4. The project management concepts within the cost baseline are applied appropriately and the cost baseline is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender is complete and reflects the case (5 marks) Ensure your submissions are submitted in an appropriate format, are concise, demonstrate clarity of expression, correct grammar and spelling. Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant. Referencing Style Harvard (author-date)