ngineering Construction - Quota Park Shared Footpath MRC 2017-025.zip Enginering and Construction - Quota Park Shared Footpath.mp4Enginering and Construction - Quota Park Shared Footpath.mp4 i cant upload these two files here, whih is essential for the case study. please let me know how can i provide this to you. 28-APR-2017 07:11 AM Need Admin assistance Student please go through this two files carefully, here is case study for project domain which we need to select. 28-APR-2017 07:10 AM Need Admin assistance Student please check the hint and marking criteria for this assignment and also read the case study and select the Engineering and construction domain. we already selected the domain so we cant change it now. so please go through it carefully. 28-APR-2017 07:04 AM Need Admin assistance Student Assessment Criteria Your assignment will be assessed on the extent and quality to which it meets each of the following criteria. A pictorial illustration of the methodology is supplied? (10%) A high-level textural overview of the methodology is provided? (20%) Examples of procedural documentation are explained and aligned with the illustration and high-level text? (10%) An implementation plan has been explained that is an accurate reflection of the case study? (10%) The methodology reflects one of the following four criteria:- The methodology meets all of the basic learning requirements of the unit, such as knowledge of fundamental concepts and performance of basic s******s; demonstrates sufficient quality of performance to be considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the learning outcomes of the assignment. (10%) The methodology reflects an ability to use and apply fundamental concepts and s******s of the unit, going beyond mere replication of content knowledge or s****** to show understanding of key ideas, awareness of their relevance, some use of analytical s******s, and some originality or insight. (20%) The methodology demonstrates awareness and understanding of deeper and less obvious aspects of the unit, such as ability to identify and debate critical issues or problems, ability to solve non-routine problems, ability to adapt and apply ideas to new situations, and ability to invent and evaluate new ideas. (30%) The methodology has been presented with imagination, originality or flair, based on proficiency in all the learning outcomes of the unit; work is interesting or surprisingly exciting, challenging, well read or scholarly. (40%) Clarity of expression, grammar and spelling? (10%)