Task Investigate the effectiveness of business information systems of the given case study. To do this, you are required to submit a complete report which includes an analysis of functionality, resources required, the broad feasibility of the project (i.e., risks) and proposed outcome based on the analysis of the case study. Choose one of the case studies from the Interact2 Resources Section and use this case study to complete assessment item 1, assessment item 2, and assessment item 3. Rationale This assessment tasks covers the fundamental concepts of object oriented analysis, relationship between analysis and design and activities of SDLC. More specifically it assess your ability to • Explain the concepts of object orientation methodology (Learning outcome 1); • Describe the activities in each phase of the system development life cycle. (Learning Outcome 2) Marking criteria Criteria HD DI CR PS FL Content of the report (i.e., analysis of functionality, resources required, the broad feasibility of the project (i.e., risks) and proposed outcome (70%) Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. Clarity of expression and presentation of response, while fully utilizing the 1200 to 1500 word-count limit. (20%) Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task type. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organized use of the 1200 to 1500 word-count limit. Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task type. Grammar and spelling accurate. 1200 to 1500 word limit maintained. Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task type. Grammar and spelling accurate. 1200 to 1500 word limit maintained. Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organized. Grammar and spelling contain errors. Exceeded or fell short by more than 10% of 1200 to 1500 word limit. Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganized manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organized, Grammar and spelling contain errors. Ignored word count completely. Referencing and Citation (10%) Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text. Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text. Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text. Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text. Referencing is absent/unsystematic. Presentation Reports should be submitted is MS Word format, using the CSU referencing style of APA. Requirements Students should visit and read the CSU Referencing Policy at http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu