A slice of role play Value: 20% Due date: 13-May-2017 Length: 500 words in total (Your initial post and reply to the other colleague’s post) (250 each) Submission method options: Alternative submission method Task You are asked to adopt the role of a character in the CERA story and to address a role play problem from that person’s perspective. You are stepping into a character, and determining a response to a problem from that character’s perspective. In the ‘Getting Started’ link on the I2 site you will find behavioural profiles of the CERA characters with whom you will be working in this assessment task. It will be an interesting and fun task! (My best preference is to describe the role of a Israel Tobin Manager, HR) You must complete a role play task, mentioned below and the role play problem for topic is provided below. For this role play you have to: - Make a first post of no more than 250 words stating how one of the CERA characters would address the problem. You must use the behavioural profile information from the Getting started link on the I2 page as well as information from the relevant topic. References are not needed. (5 marks) - Respond to a first post made by any CERA character, in no more than 250 words, adopting the perspective of another one of the CERA characters. (5 marks) Remember, it is not your own perspective being offered: you are stepping into the CERA characters. The role plays will be run in the Discussion forums. A separate role play discussion forum has been created for each topic. You must post into the correct role play to be eligible for a mark. Role play problems and close-off dates Topic and role play problem Close-off date Topic 4 What should we be trying to achieve in our individual performance measurement system? Assessment 3: Role play for topic 4 ends on Saturday 13 May, 11.59pm AEST Marking criteria Marking guide for Assessment 3 Criterion and weighting High distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Argument to address role play problem (This applies to the first and second posts.) (5, for each role play) Presents an argument that addresses the problem using deep knowledge of the topic. There are no significant gaps in the argument. Presents an argument that addresses the problem using deep knowledge of the topic. There are minor gaps in the argument. Presents an argument that addresses the problem well, using appropriate knowledge of the topic. There are some gaps in the argument. Presents an argument that addresses the problem using appropriate knowledge of the topic. However, the argument may be overly intuitive or limited in scope, lacking depth of knowledge of the topic. Fails to meet the minimum requirements of the task. Application of role (5, for each role play) Demonstrates complete application of the role behavioural characteristics, with plausible role interpretation/development. Demonstrates almost complete application of the role behavioural characteristics, with plausible role interpretation/development. Demonstrates application of the role behavioural characteristics, and some plausible role interpretation/development. Demonstrates satisfactory application of the role behavioural characteristics. Scope for further interpretation and development of the role/s. Fails to meet the minimum requirements of the task. Mark Requirements You must follow the correct process for making you initial post and your reply post, as explained above. For each role play that you do, you must complete your work by the close-off date for that role play, as set out in the table above and also in the Schedule. Extensions are not available for this assessment, so please get organised early. Look over the marking guide to get across the standard of work that is expected.