Assessment 3 Marking Criteria: NURS12154 Pharmacology for Nursing Practice: Drug Protocol Student name: Student Number: HD 85-100% D 75-84% C 65-74% P 50-64% F <50% Marks Structure -15% Excellent presentation of assignment with inclusion of all correct components. 1.5 line spacing, and 12 point font used in the discussion. Consistently accurate with spelling, grammar and use of punctuation. 5 Well-presented assignment with inclusion of correct components – minor discrepancies. 1.5 line spacing and 12 point font used in the discussion. Generally accurate (1 or 2 errors) in spelling, grammar or use of punctuation. 4 Well-presented assignment with inclusion of all components. 1.5 line spacing, and 12 point font used in the discussion. Occasional inaccuracies (3 or 4 consistent errors) with spelling, grammar or use of punctuation. 3 Adequate assignment presentation. Minor exclusion of components. 1.5 line spacing with 12 point font used in the discussion. Frequent inaccuracies (5 to 7 consistent errors) with spelling, grammar or use of punctuation. 2.5 Poorly presented assignment. Absence/major exclusion of important components. 1.5 line spacing not used and 12 point font not used in the discussion. Many inaccuracies in spelling, grammar or use of punctuation. <2.5 /15 Clear and succinct introduction and conclusion that introduces and outlines the direction of the case study discussed and a conclusion that sums up the discussion. 5 Clear and appropriate introduction and conclusion that introduces and outlines the direction of the case study discussed and a conclusion that sums up the discussion. 4 Appropriate introduction and conclusion that introduces and outlines the direction of the case study discussed and a conclusion that sums up the discussion. 3 Introduction and conclusion is apparent but there is no clear direction of the case study discussed and/or a conclusion that sums up the discussion. 2.5 No recognisable introduction and/or conclusion — topic is not introduced and/or no direction offered of the case study discussed and/or no conclusion that sums up the discussion. <2.5 Content is clearly relevant to the topic. The approach clearly and comprehensively addresses the topic and the discussion proceeds logically. Well linked to supporting literature. 5 Content is relevant to the topic, the approach clearly addresses the topic and proceeds logically. Supporting literature is used appropriately. 4 Content is appropriate and addresses the topic and for the most part proceeds logically. Minimal omissions in links to supporting literature. 3 Content addresses the topic but at times is repetitive or lacks cohesion. Supporting literature used but frequent omissions in links identified. 2.5 Content is irrelevant and or does not address the topic. There is a lack of cohesion. Little to no links to supporting literature. <2.5 Approach and Argument (70%) Comprehensive consideration of all aspects of the assessment piece. Demonstrated thorough understanding of relevance of content is clearly evident to nursing practice. 8.5-10 Broad consideration of most aspects of the assigned assessment task. Clearly demonstrates understanding of how content is relevant to nursing practice. 7.5-8 Adequate consideration of most aspects of the assigned assessment task. Generally demonstrates understanding of how content is relevant to nursing practice. 6.5-7 Content addresses the assigned assessment task. Demonstrates limited understanding of how content is relevant to nursing practice. 5-6 Content does not address all aspects of the assessment task. Inadequate description of required content and no demonstration of understanding of required content relevant to nursing practice. <5 Comprehensively presents a detailed drug protocol that includes the considerations for the appropriate administration of the medication relevant to the diagnosed disease process in the case study with clear, coherent and convincing critical thought displayed. 17-20 Extensively includes a thorough drug protocol including the considerations for the appropriate administration of the medication relevant to the diagnosed disease process in the case study with well-developed critical thought evident. 15-16 Generally includes a reasonable presentation of drug protocol including considerations for the appropriate administration of the medication relevant to the diagnosed disease process in the case study with critical thought developed and presented. 13-14 Basic presentation of drug protocol and discussion with basic consideration for the appropriate administration of the medication relevant to the diagnosed disease process in the case study. Perceptible critical thought. 10-12 Incomplete, inadequate or no presentation of drug protocol with minimal, inadequate inclusion of considerations for the appropriate administration of the medication relevant to the diagnosed disease process in the case study. <10 Comprehensively includes an extensive detailed discussion justifying the use of the medication relevant to the disease process in the case study with clear, coherent and convincing critical thought displayed. 17-20 Extensively includes a thorough discussion justifying the use of the medication relevant to the disease process in the case study with well-developed critical thought displayed. 15-16 Generally includes a reasonable discussion of justifying the use of the medication relevant to the disease process in the case study with critical thought evident. 13-14 Basic presentation of a discussion justifying the use of the medication relevant to the disease process in the case study. Perceptible critical thought. 10-12 Incomplete, inadequate, minimal, or no discussion of justifying the use of the medication relevant to the diagnosed disease process in the case study. Limited or no critical thought demonstrated. <10 Comprehensively includes an extensive detailed discussion critically analysing factors involved in utilising the written drug protocol relevant to the individual circumstances in the case study with clear, coherent and convincing critical thought displayed. 17-20 Extensively includes a thorough discussion critically analysing factors involved in utilising the written drug protocol relevant to the individual circumstances in the case study with well-developed critical thought evident. 15-16 Generally includes a reasonable discussion analysing factors involved in utilising the written drug protocol relevant to the individual circumstances in the case study with critical thought evident. 13-14 Basic discussion of factors involved in utilising the written drug protocol relevant to the individual circumstances in the case study. Perceptible critical thought. 10-12 Incomplete, limited or no discussion of factors involved in utilising the written drug protocol relevant to the individual circumstances in the case study. <10 /70 Referencing - 15% Consistently accurate with in-text referencing to support and reflect all ideas, factual information and quotations. 5 1 or 2 consistent in-text referencing errors identified to support and reflect all ideas, factual information and quotations. 4 3 or 4 consistent in-text referencing errors identified to support and reflect all ideas, factual information and quotations. 3 5 or 6 inconsistent in-text referencing errors identified to support and reflect all ideas, factual information and quotations. 2.5 Referencing is not consistent with APA style. Many inaccuracies with in-text referencing to support and reflect all ideas, factual information and quotations. <2.5 /15 A minimum of 10 up-to-date references used including 5 up-to-date journal articles as well as relevant books and web sites. 5 A minimum of 9 references used including 4 journal articles as well as relevant books and web sites. 4 A minimum of 8 references used including 4 journal articles as well as relevant books and web sites. 3 A minimum of 7 references used including 3 journal articles as well as relevant books and web sites. 2.5 The required number of 7 references not used journal articles not sourced. Relevant web sites not used. <2.5 Reference list appears in alphabetical order and fully adheres to reference list presentation guidelines APA style. 5 Reference list appears in alphabetical order and consistently adheres to reference list presentation guidelines APA style. 4 Reference list appears in alphabetical order and frequently adheres to reference list presentation guidelines APA style. 3 Reference list appears in alphabetical order and occasionally adheres to reference list presentation guidelines APA style. 2.5 Reference list appears in no alphabetical order and does not adhere to reference list presentation guidelines APA style. <2.5 Total Marks /100 Grade: Markers Comments: Marker: