Assessment task 2 Assessment 2 Reflective essay Task Description This assessment consists of two (2) parts. PART 1 is a formative assessment task and requires small groups of students to facilitate a group of their peers in a short session on a topic that will be allocated in workshop A. Individual facilitation skills will be formatively assessed (ungraded) with feedback given by staff and peers to assist students with the completion of Part 2. PART 2 is a summative assessment task (graded) and requires the student to engage in reflective practice and produce an essay based on their experience of facilitating a group of their peers in a short session in workshop B. Students are to deconstruct the experience using the Gibb’s Reflective Cycle model. Write an essay that: • Briefly describes the experience • Demonstrates how the Gibb’s Reflective Cycle model helped an understanding of self and alternative views in relation to the experience of facilitating a session in workshop B. • Reveals new understanding around facilitating groups of individuals through analysis of relevant information including journal articles Return Date to Students Following declaration of results to students Assessment Length 3000 words Weighting 60% Assessment Criteria Your assignment will be evaluated on the following assessment criteria: Content – 60% Organisation, style and language – 20% Research and referencing – 20% Referencing Style Author – Date (Harvard) A summary of the Harvard system can be accessed in the online guide on the Library website at: http://public01.library.uow.edu.au/refcite/style- guides/html/ Assessment 2: Marking Guide Student No ………………………….. Campus ……………………. Tutorial Group ……………. Criteria Absent Inadequate Satisfactory Good Excellent Marks Content • Briefly describes the experience • Demonstrates how the Gibb’s Reflective Cycle model helped an understanding of self and alternative views in relation to the experience of facilitating a group session in workshop B SNPG960. • Critically analyses material including journal articles and synthesises these findings with the personal reflection undertaken to reveal new understanding of group facilitation 0 0 0 1-7 1-12 1-9 7.5-10 12.5-15 10-12 11-13 16-20 13-16 14-15 21-25 17-20 /60 Organisation, style and language • Adheres to school requirements for formatting. Assignment logically developed, evidence of linkage of information • Appropriate introduction, body and conclusion. Headings used to direct the reflection • Syntax, grammar, punctuation and spelling are correct, legible presentation • Objective and authentic writing style, appropriate use of academic language. Technical terms explained where necessary 0 0 0 0 1-2 1-2 1-2 1-2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 5 5 5 5 /20 Research and referencing • Appropriate material selected ( quality and relevance) • Appropriate quantity of material selected • Smooth integration of references • Accurate referencing as per SN requirements 0 0 0 0 1-2 1-2 1-2 1-2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 5 5 5 5 /20 This assignment is worth 60% of the total assessment for this subject. Comments Late Penalty (if applicable):