3/8/2017 ALEC ­ RubricBuilder https://app.secure.griffith.edu.au/alec/index.php?v=print_preview&a=3&rubric_id=34322 1/1 Rubric Builder Rubric 34322 Program BITHM_Sport Management Course Code 2018HSL Course Title Org Staging Mjr Sport Events Semester Offering Trimester 2 2017 Assessment Task Legacy critical analysis Assessment Weighting 45 Objective Name Criteria Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Written Communication 15% Presentation/mechanics Quality of writing at a very high standard (i.e., use of a clear and well thought­out introduction providing clear guidance to the document, good use of headings throughout, strong conclusion). Excellent sentence structure, grammar, with no spelling / punctuation errors. Quality of writing is of a high standard (i.e., a mostly well thought­out introduction although some minor inconsistencies from the actual document, good use of headings, concise conclusion). Minimal errors in relation to sentence structure, grammar and spelling/punctuation. Quality of writing is of a good standard (i.e., an introduction is provided however some areas omitted which are included in the document, headings used provide sufficient signposting, good conclusion). Some errors in relation to sentence structure, grammar and spelling / punctuation that cause some disruption to the 'flow' of writing. Some problems with sentence structure, grammar and presentation, but still possible to follow core arguments. Introduction/ conclusion included, but don't fully 'signpost' assignment content for the reader. Quality of writing is at a very poor standard (i.e., limited or no introduction/ conclusion included, poor use (or no use) of headings, etc.). Sentence /paragraph structure, grammar, and/or spelling/punctuation problematic. Social Responsibility and Sustainability 15% Knowledge of chosen topic (i.e., economic, social or environmental event legacies) Demonstrates very high level of detailed knowledge on event legacies, specifically chosen topic (economic, social or environmental outcomes). Acknowledges inter­related nature of legacies. Key terms, concepts and historical context clearly explained. Demonstrates high level of knowledge on event legacies, specifically chosen topic (economic, social or environmental outcomes). Good explanation of key terms, concepts and historical context. Demonstrates a good level of knowledge on event legacies, specifically chosen topic. Some key terms and concepts defined, and contextual information provided, although more could help 'set the scene'. Demonstrates limited knowledge on event legacies, and adopts a narrow focus in addressing assignment question. More could be done to define key terms and concepts and to explain relevant context. Demonstrates little, if any, knowledge of event legacies, and selected topic. Poor job of defining key terms / concepts and explaining context in a way that adequately 'sets the scene' for the reader. Social Responsibility and Sustainability 15% Creation of a coherent argument about economic, social or environmental event legacies Ideas on legacy and event sustainability are arranged in an extremely logical, structured and coherent manner. Transition statements are clearly used as a guide. Ideas on legacy and event sustainability are arranged in a fairly logical, structured and coherent manner. Transition statements are generally used as a guide. Ideas on legacy and event sustainability are arranged in a logical, some­what structured and coherent manner. Transition statements are used at times. Ideas on legacy and event sustainability appear in a less logical, structured and coherent manner. Transition statements are rarely used. There is little, if any, coherent structure to the document and discussion on legacy and event sustainability. The document is confusing with no use of transition statements. Social Responsibility and Sustainability 15% Acknowledgement of stakeholders Student does an excellent job of identifying key event stakeholders pertinent to chosen topic, and their stake. Student's analysis captures the dynamic and complex nature of stakeholder management in relation to event legacy planning and implementation. Student identifies many key event stakeholders pertinent to chosen topic, and their stake. Student's analysis captures the complexity of stakeholder management in relation to event legacy planning and implementation. Student identifies some of the key stakeholders pertinent to their chosen topic, and their stake. Student's analysis acknowledges the complexity of stakeholder management in event legacy planning and implementation. Student identifies a few of the key stakeholders pertinent to their chosen topic. Student's analysis acknowledges that managing stakeholders can be challenging in event legacy planning and implementation. Student fails to identify key stakeholders and/or to adequately acknowledge the impact of event legacy planning and implementation on stakeholders. Social Responsibility and Sustainability 15% Balanced perspectives (i.e., student acknowledges that positives / negatives Provides a balanced perspective of ideas/issues associated with chosen topic. Very high level of critical analysis of economic, social or environmental event legacies and event sustainability. Demonstrates a balanced understanding of ideas/issues related to chosen topic. High level of critical analysis of economic, social or environmental event legacies and event sustainability. Acknowledges different perspectives of chosen topic, although some key ideas/issues in the literature are overlooked. Some critical analysis evident. Some ideas/issues related to chosen topic are presented, although critical analysis is limited, and perspectives covered tend to be more positive or negative than balanced. Critical analysis is extremely limited; assignment is predominately descriptive and fails to present different perspectives on key ideas/issues associated with topic. Social Responsibility and Sustainability 10% Recommendations for a socially responsible and sustainable future Student does an excellent job of connecting feasible recommendations to issues identified through the critical analysis. Future recommendations are geared towards socially responsible and sustainable event management. Student recommendations are geared towards socially responsible and sustainable event management and connect to issues identified through analysis. Feasibility of some recommendations questionable. Student makes logical, although perhaps not realistic recommendations related to their topic and socially responsible and sustainable event management. Connections to critical analysis not explicit. Student provides recommendations for a socially responsible and sustainable future, although ideas are not all feasible, directly pertinent to topic, or connected to issues identified in analysis. Student fails to make meaningful recommendations for a socially responsible and sustainable future. Written Communication 15% Sources/evidence (including industry standards) Utilises current, appropriate and credible sources which strongly support arguments throughout. Has a minimum of 10 high quality peerreviewed journal articles, plus other industry appropriate literature. Excellent in­text citation. Utilises mostly current, appropriate and credible sources which mostly support arguments throughout. Has a minimum of 10 peer­reviewed journal articles, plus some industry relevant literature. Very good in­text citation. Utilises some current, appropriate and credible sources. Has a minimum of 10 journal articles, but not all from high quality / peerreviewed sources. Includes some industry relevant literature, all cited in­text. Utilises sufficient current, appropriate and credible sources to support student's argument. Has a minimum of 10 journal articles, but relevance and quality of some articles questionable. Satisfactory in­text citation. Utilises little, if any, current, appropriate and credible sources which provide limited support to the student's arguments. Poor in­text citation. Fails to include a minimum of 10 peerreviewed journal articles and/or industry relevant publications.