Assessment Item 2- REPORT Length 1500 words (+ 10%) Format report Referencing APA referencing. For more information, see: https://www.cqu.edu.au/?a=14033 TASK This is an individual assessment that extends the first assignment. Taking the perspective of the organisation examined in Assessment Item 1 students are to select one of the following: 1. Governance 2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship 3. Knowledge management and eCommerce Students are to provide an overview of the chosen area and assess how it would be utlised by the organisation as a means of enhancing business practice. The format of the assessment is a report of 1500 words in length. Students are to demonstrate knowledge of the subject matter by: Defining relevant terms, theories and concepts presented in topics 6-8. TOPIC 6 - GOVERNANCE OPTIONS FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF ORGANISATIONS TOPIC 7 - INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP TOPIC 8 - KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ECOMMERCE Showing an ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation Showing an ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy. Demonstrating a breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 23-25 academic sources. Correctly using the APA in text referencing system to correctly citing academic sources. REPORTS • Have appropriate headings and sub-headings for sections which are numbered. • May include material such as tables and figures. If the tables/figures are not too large (less than ½ of a page) they can be included in the body of the report. Alternatively, if large, include in the appendices at the end of the report. REPORT STRUCTURE • The title page • Executive summary • Table of contents • List of tables and figures • Body of the report - Body of the report - Introduction (10-15%) - Background - Aims/ objectives - Scope - Discussion (60-70%) - Conclusion (10-15%) - Recommendations (10%) • Reference List • Appendices MGMT20144 ASSESSMENT ITEM 2 – MARKING RUBRIC Criteria 85-100% (HD) 75-84% (D) 65-74% (Cr) 50-64% (P) 0-49% (F1) 1. (8 Marks) Defining key terms, theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 Exceptional ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤8 Excellent ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤7 Proficient ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤6 Satisfactory ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤5 Emerging ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤4 2. (8 Marks) Ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. Superior ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤8 Well-developed ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤7 Above average ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤6 Sound ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤5 Inadequate ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤4 3. (8 Marks) Ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 Superior ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤8 Well-developed ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤7 Above average ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤6 Sound ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤5 Inadequate ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤4 4. (3 Marks) Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 12-16 academic sources. Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 23-25 academic sources. 3 Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 20-22 academic sources. 2.5 Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 17-19 academic sources. 2 Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 12-16 academic sources. 1.5 Demonstrated unsatisfactory breadth and quality of research by using fewer than 12-16 academic sources. 1 5. (3 Marks) Correctly using the APA in text referencing system to correctly citing academic sources. Faultless use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 3 Very good use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 2.5 Competent use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 2 Satisfactory use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 1.5 Unacceptable use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 1