PPMP20008 Assessment 3: Requirements, Quality and Cost This is a group assessment. Groups are to have a maximum of four students and ideally a minimum of three. Flex (distance) students are able to work as individuals or in groups for the assessments. Assessment Individual or Group Case/Tender Based Due Date Ass 1: Project Charter Individual Yes Week 4 Friday Time: 11.45pm Ass 2: Scope Baseline Work Package Schedule Baseline Stakeholder Register Group Yes Week 6 Friday Time: 11.45pm Ass 3: Requirements Management Plan Quality Management Plan Cost Management Plan Cost Baseline and Funding Requirements Group Yes Week 8 Friday Time: 11.45pm Ass 4: Risk Register Individual Yes Week 10 Friday Time: 5pm Note: for consistency, you will not be penalised as long as your submission is in by 11.45pm Ass 5: Presentation Group No Week 12 On Campus Students: Submit your files prior to presenting in class during week 12. Flex Students: Friday (week 12) Time: 5pm Note: for flex only, you will not be penalised as long as your submission is in by 11.45pm Assessment 3 You are to develop a requirements management plan, quality management plan, cost management plan; and a cost baseline including funding requirements. These are four separate documents, they need to be reflective of the project described in the selected tender and align to the requirements of the PMBoK and Prince2. Title Page Include a title page at the beginning of each assessment item with the following information: • Student name/s (include names of all students in group for group assessments – 2, 3 & 5) • Student number/s (include number of all students in group for group assessments) • The project domain and name • The document name (e.g. Charter, Scope Baseline etc.) Criteria You are required to apply your knowledge of project management concepts when developing the four documents mentioned in the criteria below. Make sure you develop the document described as if you were planning the project. Do not submit a report discussing what that document is. Assessment Criteria Allocated marks Appropriate application of the following project management concepts in the development of the following documents for the project described in the selected tender. 1 The project management concepts within the requirements management plan are applied appropriately and the requirements management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. 5 2 The project management concepts within the quality management plan are applied appropriately and the quality management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. 5 3 The project management concepts within the cost management plan are applied appropriately and the cost management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender is complete and reflects the case. 5 4 The project management concepts within the cost baseline are applied appropriately and the cost baseline is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender is complete and reflects the case. 5 Total Marks 20 Ensure your submissions are submitted in an appropriate format, are concise, demonstrate clarity of expression, and correct grammar and spelling. Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant. Assessment 3 Marking Rubric 0 marks 1 mark 2 marks 3 marks 4 marks 5 marks The following rubric relates to the ‘document’ listed in each of the assessment criteria and should be read in conjunction with the criteria. Note: Referencing must be included in the project documents, including referencing tender documents. The rubric refers to poor referencing. The absence of references may be taken to be plagiarism and could result in academic misconduct penalties being applied. The document was not supplied and/or what was provided did not relate to the assessment. The document is neither clear nor easy to understand. Less than 25% of the project management concepts within the document are included and/or appropriate application was demonstrated in less than 25% of the required concepts. The document is a reasonably accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Improvements may be required in the formatting, referencing, grammar and/or spelling. If so the student should seek assistance from the ALC. Between 25% and 50% of the project management concepts within the document are included and/or appropriate application was demonstrated in between 25% and 50% of the required concepts. The document is a reasonably accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Improvements may be required in the formatting, referencing, grammar and/or spelling. If so the student should seek assistance from the ALC. The project management concepts within the document are mostly included and/or appropriate application was demonstrated in the majority of the required concepts. The document is a reasonably accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Formatting, referencing, grammar and spelling are reasonable, some improvements may be needed. The project management concepts within the document are all included and any errors in application are few and minor. The document is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Formatting, referencing, grammar and spelling are well done. Any issues are few and minor. The project management concepts within the document are all included and correctly applied. The document is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. Formatting, referencing, grammar and spelling are excellent. Any issues could be interpreted as typographical in nature and are rare within the document.