MGMT20144 ASSESSMENT ITEM 2 – MARKING RUBRIC STUDENT NAME: STUDENT NUMBER: Note: The markers will write comments throughout the assignment using ‘pencil’ in Turnitin. It is expected that Turnitin similarity score is less than 20%. It is possible that you get a little bit higher level if you have a very long reference list. But if the higher similarity is found in the body of the assignment, this is unacceptable. Higher similarity score may significantly affect your marks for each criterion as marks are given based on original texts and appropriately referenced texts only. It is suggested that you reduce direct quotes for other sources wherever possible. Markers will analyse the similarity score reported by Turnitin case by case. Criteria 85-100% (HD) 75-84% (D) 65-74% (Cr) 50-64% (P) 0-49% (F1) 1. (8 Marks) Defining key terms, theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 Exceptional ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤8 Excellent ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤7 Proficient ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤6 Satisfactory ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤5 Emerging ability to define key terms and utilise the theories and concepts presented in weeks 6-8.
 ≤4 2. (8 Marks) Ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. Superior ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤8 Well-developed ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤7 Above average ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤6 Sound ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤5 Inadequate ability to utilise the specific contextual factor chosen, explain key details and assess its impact on the relevant firm or organisation. ≤4 3. (8 Marks) Ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 Superior ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤8 Well-developed ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤7 Above average ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤6 Sound ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤5 Inadequate ability to explain major domestic and international contextual factors and how they affect business structures and strategy.
 ≤4 4. (3 Marks) Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 12-16 academic sources. Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 23-25 academic sources. 3 Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 20-22 academic sources. 2.5 Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 17-19 academic sources. 2 Demonstrated breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 12-16 academic sources. 1.5 Demonstrated unsatisfactory breadth and quality of research by using fewer than 12-16 academic sources. 1 5. (3 Marks) Correctly using the APA in text referencing system to correctly citing academic sources. Faultless use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 3 Very good use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 2.5 Competent use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 2 Satisfactory use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 1.5 Unacceptable use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list to correctly cite academic sources. 1 TOTAL = /30 Sum of all marks for the above 1-5 items ( ) minus marks for each part or full day past the due date ( ) OVERALL COMMENT: