42908 Assessment Task 2 Literature Review: Marking Criteria Marking Criteria WEIGHTING Unsatisfactory (0) Substandard (30) Pass (60) Credit (70) Distinction (80) High Distinction (90) Outstanding (100) Abstract Brief overview of topic and research area, main aim of project, main findings and conclusions 5% Introduction Presents general research area, specific topic, main aim of project and a brief outline of what will follow 10% Literature Review Summarises and demonstrates understanding of relevant and important research in the chosen field (15 high quality references) 20% Evaluation Organises and critically evaluates the research , links to own project, describes how own project uses/adds to the literature reviewed 25% Conclusions Brief discussion leads to specific conclusions supported by Review section evaluation. Highlights research gap for project to fill. 10% Referencing Citations and References list correctly follow Harvard UTS referencing style, with consistent use between text and list 10% Organisation Logical organisation and flowing paragraphs. Appropriate use of academic language. 10% Grammar Grammar and spelling mostly used well, not distracting the reader 10%