La Trobe Business School
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS [BUS5KMS]
Subject Learning Guide
Semester 1 2017 Bundoora
Subject Coordinator: Dr Petrus A Usmanij
La Trobe University
2
Table of Contents
SUBJECT DETAILS 3
GENERAL DETAILS 3 ENROLMENT REQUIREMENTS 3 STAFF CONTACTS 3 SUBJECT DESCRIPTION 3 SUBJECT INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES (SILOS) 3 GRADUATE CAPABILITIES 3 LEARNING ACTIVITY SUMMARY 4 ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK SUMMARY 4 LEARNING RESOURCES 4 STUDENT FEEDBACK ON SUBJECT SURVEY 4
POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 5
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY 5 EXTENSIONS, LATE SUBMISSIONS AND PENALTIES 5 STUDENT COMPLAINT 6 STUDENT LEARNING UNIT (SL) 6 LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) 6 LIBRARY 6 STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES 7 PEER LEARNING ADVISERS 7
SCHEDULE OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES 8
SESSION PLAN 8 LEARNING ACTIVITY DETAILS 9
ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK DETAILS 10
DETAILED GRADING CRITERIA 13 ASSESSMENT TASK 1 13 ASSESSMENT TASK 2 14 ASSESSMENT TASK 3 14 ASSESSMENT TASK 4 15
La Trobe University
3
Subject Details
GENERAL DETAILS
Subject Code: BUS5KMS Subject Title: Knowledge Management Systems
Teaching Period: Semester 1, 2017 Location(s): Bundoora
Credit Points: 15 Mode: Face-to-face and LMS
Level: 5
ENROLMENT REQUIREMENTS
Prerequisites: BUS5BID, BUS5BIM
Co-requisites: n/a
Incompatibles: n/a
Assumed Skills & Knowledge: Basic information systems
Special Study Requirements: n/a
STAFF CONTACTS
Role Campus Name Email Telephone Room Subject Coordinator Bundoora Petrus Usmanij [email protected] 94791620 MAR 375 Tutor Bundoora Naren Shanbhag [email protected]
SUBJECT DESCRIPTION
This subject develops student's understanding of evolution of knowledge management and the various technologies that enable and facilitate the creation, storage and dissemination of organisational knowledge. Highlevel design of knowledge management driven technology-based initiatives like corporate knowledge directories, process documentation, datawarehouses, BI, process automation, workflow; and document management are discussed. Further, knowledge management system technologies including intranets and portals, knowledge management system life cycle, organisational cultural issues in knowledge management projects, knowledge management system deployment and evaluation are also covered. A study tour to explore various implementation of knowledge management in the real industry may be incorporated in this subject.
SUBJECT INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES (SILOS)
Upon successful completion of this subject, you should be able to :
1
Develop the knowledge and learning related to knowledge management (KM) foundations, cycle, and management of knowledge processes such as capture, codification, sharing, application and creation
2
Develop the skills and understanding of the role of organizational culture, knowledge management maturity models, communities of practice (CoP), and knowledge management tools
3
Develop the skills and understanding of the strategic management of knowledge, knowledge metrics, teams, and future challenges in the field
GRADUATE CAPABILITIES
The following Graduate Capabilities (GCs) are evaluated in this subject:
GC GC Point
a Literacies and Communication Skills: Writing, Speaking, Cultural Literacy
Mid-point
b Inquiry and Analytical Skills: Critical Thinking Mid-point
La Trobe University
4
LEARNING ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Learning Activity: Schedule
Lectures Weeks 1-12
Tutorials Weeks 2-12
Further information is available at http://www.latrobe.edu.au/timetable/
ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK SUMMARY
Assessment Tasks: Due Date SILOs GCs % Comments
One individual, 2,000-word assignment 17 May 2017 5pm 1, 2, 3 a, b 50% Online submission via LMS
Weekly tutorial in-class work Ongoing Weeks 2 - 12 1, 2, 3 a, b 20% In-class submission
Weekly tutorial online submission work Ongoing Weeks 2 - 12 1, 2, 3 a, b 20% Online submission via LMS
Weekly seminar participation Ongoing Weeks 1 - 12 1, 2, 3 a, b 10% In-class work/submission
LEARNING RESOURCES
Reading Type Title Author and Year Publisher
Readings (Recommended)
Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice
Dalkir, Kamiz, 2011 MIT Press
Journals Various titles, please refer to the LMS (reading list)
Various authors and years Various publishers
STUDENT FEEDBACK ON SUBJECT SURVEY The Student Feedback on Subjects (SFS) Survey is part of the quality assurance process that occurs across the university. In this survey you are invited to tell us about your learning experiences in this subject. We want you to tell us of your experience in this subject. Your views will be taken seriously and will assist us to enhance this subject for the next group of students. Your feedback will also contribute to the text for ‘Summary of Previous Student Feedback’ below so please take the time to tell us your views. The surveys are anonymous and will be distributed prior to the end of the teaching period. For information on Student Feedback on Subjects refer to: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/leadership-volunteering/speak-up/subjects-teaching
Edited with the trial version of Foxit Advanced PDF Editor
To remove this notice, visit: www.foxitsoftware.com/shopping
La Trobe University
5
Policies, Procedures and Guidelines
The University has a comprehensive policy framework to which both staff and students must adhere. You should familiarise yourself with those policies, procedures and guidelines likely to affect you especially the following:
• Academic Integrity • Academic Progress • Assessment and Feedback • Extension to Submission Dates • Late Submission of Assessment Tasks • Occupational, Health and Safety [OHS] • Privacy • Special Consideration • Student Charter • Use of Electronic Mail
The relevant policies, procedures and guidelines can be found on the website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/policy/
Academic Integrity
Academic integrity means being honest in academic work and taking responsibility for learning the conventions of scholarship. La Trobe University views this seriously as evidenced by the following extract:
Academic honesty is a fundamental principle in teaching, learning, research and scholarship. The University requires its academic staff and students to observe the highest ethical standards in all aspects of academic work and it demonstrates its commitment to these values by awarding due credit for honestly conducted scholarly work, and by penalising academic misconduct and all forms of cheating.
Academic Integrity Procedures (2012, p. 1 of 6)
Academic misconduct includes improper referencing, plagiarism, copying and cheating. You should familiarise yourself with your responsibilities in relation to Academic Integrity and if you have any questions, direct them to your Course Coordinator. Information can be found on the website at: www.latrobe.edu.au/students/academic-integrity
All hard copy assignments should be accompanied by the Academic Integrity Assignment Declaration Form available at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/711152/Assignment-Declaration-Form.pdf.
For assistance with referencing visit http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/academic-integrity/referencing-help
Special Consideration
Special Consideration is the term used to describe a process that applies an equity measure to ensure that where any temporary adverse circumstances beyond the control of a student, that impact negatively on that student’s ability to demonstrate their learning achievement for an assessment task, is taken into account.
Eligibility to apply for Special Consideration does not automatically imply eligibility to receive it. Certain criteria must be satisfied in order to receive Special Consideration.
Please refer to the relevant policies, procedures and guidelines website athttp://www.latrobe.edu.au/policy/
Submission of special consideration applications for assignments, mid-semester tests and final examinations should be made online at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/special-consideration
Extensions, Late Submissions and Penalties
There are policies and procedures to guarantee fair, consistent and transparent treatment of late submission of assessment tasks provide equity around extensions to submission dates and penalties associated with not submitting assessment by the due date and time.
The University requires fair, consistent and transparent treatment of late submission of assessment tasks. The procedure for late submission is documented in the Late Submission of Assessment Tasks document (Ref. no. 112027D). It states:
The standard penalty for late submission of assessment tasks is 5% of the marks for that task for each delay in submission of a day or partial day up to a maximum of five (5) working days after the due date. Assessment tasks will not be accepted after the earlier of the following occurrences:
La Trobe University
6
• The fifth (5th) working day after the due date; or • Feedback on the assessment task has been returned to any student by the Teaching Team member.
These penalties apply only to individual assessment tasks worth 15% or more of the total assessment for the subject. Late submission of take home examinations is not permitted.
Submission of special consideration applications for assignments, mid-semester tests and final examinations should be made online at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/?a=668155.
Please refer to the relevant policies, procedures and guidelines website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/policy/
Student Complaint
La Trobe University is committed to an effective complaints handling mechanism for students in line with its policy of creating a harmonious and productive study environment. Feedback stemming from student complaints is a valuable source of information that helps the University improve the quality of its service.
You should lodge a complaint if:
• you are unhappy about something specific in your academic life (eg not enough seating in a lecture, staff not available during office hours, cancelled lectures...) • you don't think 'the rules' (university policy or procedure) are being followed • a university staff member has been rude or their behaviour to you was inappropriate • you have a dispute about a process used during an appeal • you have reported something to I&O, security or academic staff and you have not received a response after a reasonable amount of time • you are a victim of bullying or harassment
For more information on student complaint process and to lodge a formal complaint visit: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/complaints
Student Learning Unit (SL)
The Student Learning Unit (SL) works closely with teaching staff in the Schools and on the Melbourne and regional campuses to ensure that all La Trobe students – including those from non-English-speaking backgrounds – develop high-level academic speaking, writing, reading, and numeracy skills required for successful learning in their courses. For further information, please see the website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/learning/
Learning Management System (LMS)
The Learning Management System (LMS) is an Internet based system which allows you access to learning materials and to interact with other students and teaching staff in activities related to your studies from any location with Internet access. Most subjects have a LMS site into which you are automatically added as part of your enrolment into the subject.
The LMS can be accessed at: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/lms/login/ by using your Username and Password provided to you on your Statement of Account. If you are having trouble accessing the LMS or want to find out more about LMS, please see the website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/it/teaching/lms
Library
Your Library offers many ways to support your study. Play Library Quest lib.latrobe.edu.au/libraryquest to discover more about how we can help, or visit our website and explore these essential resources:
• Achieve@ Uni [latrobe.edu.au/students/support/achieve] – learn important skills needed at university, includes finding and using information in your assessment tasks, referencing, reading, writing and presenting, academic language, and maths skills; • Assignment Calculator [latrobe.edu.au/library/assignment-thesis-support/assignment-calculator] – plan your assignment schedule and submit on time; • Referencing [latrobe.libguides.com/referencing] - understand why and how we reference, includes the four major styles;
La Trobe University
7
• Expert Help [latrobe.libguides.com] – provides expert discipline and specialist help; get help here with assessment tasks; • Live chat to library staff [lib.latrobe.edu.au/chat] – live chat for help; during semester hours only;
Student Support Services
If you have special needs due to disability or other factors the Equality and Diversity Centre can provide advice and support. This Centre can be contacted by telephone on (03) 9479 2900 (Melbourne); (03) 5444 7410 (Bendigo); (02) 6024 9628 (AlburyWodonga); National Relay Service Deaf and Hearing Impaired: T: 133677 (within Australia only). Email: [email protected] or refer to the website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/support .
Peer Learning Advisers
Peer Learning Advisers (PLAs) are experienced students who can help you with assignment and thesis writing, maths and statistics and other academic skills. PLAs are friendly and approachable and come from many disciplines; e.g. health sciences, business or education. Their drop-in service is available at these campuses: Bundoora, Bendigo, Albury-Wodonga, Mildura and Shepparton. Their timetable is available online: latrobe.edu.au/students/learning/drop-in-learning-support.
La Trobe University
8
Schedule of Learning Activities
Session Plan
Week Date Topic Activity Assessment % Resources SILOs GCs
1 28-Feb
Introduction to KM in Theory and Practice
Lecture 1
No Tutorial
Lecture 1 Slides
1 a, b
2 7-Mar
The Knowledge Management Cycle
Lecture 2 1%
Lecture 2 Slides
1 a, b
2 7-Mar
Basic principles of Knowledge Management
Tutorial 1 4%
Tutorial 1 Readings
1 a, b
3 14-Mar
Knowledge Management Models
Lecture 3 1%
Lecture 3 Slides
1, 2 a, b
3 14-Mar
Trust and the Knowledge Management Cycle
Tutorial 2 4%
Tutorial 2 Readings
1, 2 a, b
4 21-Mar
Knowledge Capture and Codification
Lecture 4 1%
Lecture 4 Slides
1, 2 a, b
4 21-Mar
Organisational learning and learning organisations
Tutorial 3 4%
Tutorial 3 Readings
1, 2 a, b
5 28-Mar
Knowledge Sharing and Communities of Practice
Lecture 5 1%
Lecture 5 Slides
1, 2 a, b
5 28-Mar
Memory
Tutorial 4 4%
Tutorial 4 Readings
1, 2 a, b
6 4-Apr
Applying Knowledge for Innovation
Lecture 6 1%
Lecture 6 Slides
1, 2, 3 a, b
6 4-Apr
Knowledge, Competencies and New Knowledge Creation
Tutorial 5 4%
Tutorial 5 Readings
1, 2 a, b
7
11-Apr
The Role of Organizational Culture
Lecture 7 1% Lectures 1–6 slides
Tutorials 1-5 Readings
1, 2, 3 a, b
7 11-Apr
Organisational Environment
Tutorial 6 4%
Tutorial 6 Readings
1, 2 a, b
17-Apr EASTER BREAK Until 23 Apr
8 25-Apr
Knowledge Management Tools (do your own study)
No Lecture due to ANZAC Day
Lecture 8 Slides
1, 2, 3 a, b
8 25-Apr
Knowledge Management Systems (do your own study)
No Tutorial due to ANZAC Day
Tutorial 7 Readings
1, 2, 3 a, b
9 2-May
The Importance of KM Technologies
Lecture 9 1%
Lecture 9 Slides
1, 2, 3 a, b
9 2-May
The Role of Technology and Knowledge Management
Tutorial 8 4%
Tutorial 8 Readings
1, 2, 3 a, b
10 9-May
KM Techniques, Strategy and Metrics
Lecture 10 1%
Lecture 10 Slides
2, 3 a, b
10 9-May
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Tutorial 9 4%
Tutorial 9 Readings
1, 2, 3 a, b
11 16-May
Governance and the KM Team
Lecture 11 1%
Lecture 11 Slides
1, 2, 3 a, b
La Trobe University
9
Week Date Topic Activity Assessment % Resources SILOs GCs
11 16-May
Knowledge Management Governance
Tutorial 10 4%
Tutorial 10 Readings
2, 3 a, b
12 23-May
Revision Lecture
Assignment Due
Lecture 12
Assignment
1%
50%
Lectures 1-11 Slides
1, 2, 3 a, b
12 23-May
KM Obstacles/Governance and the KM Team
Tutorial 11 4%
Tutorial 11 Readings
1, 2, 3 a, b
13 30-May -
2-Jun
STUDY VACATION
13-16 3-Jun -
23-Jun
CENTRAL EXAMINATION PERIOD
Learning Activity Details
Times and rooms are subject to change. To view the full time and location details for learning activities in this subject, please ensure you seek further information available at http://www.latrobe.edu.au/timetable/.
You should also regularly check [at least once per week] the subject’s LMS site (where applicable) for updated information.
La Trobe University
10
Assessment and Feedback Details
Assessment Task 1 Due Date % SILOs Assessed
One individual, 2,000-word assignment 17 May 2017 at 5:00 PM 50 1, 2, 3
Submission Details
• Written report must be submitted through the LMS assignment Turnitin link on Tuesday 23rd May 2017 by 5.00 pm
The report will comprise: o A brief introduction o a review of relevant literature on the theme you have selected o a review of the KMS o a critical discussion o a conclusion and o a list of references
• The report should be 2000 words (word-processed in 1.5 spacing, 12-point, Times New Roman). • All quoted material should be fully cited APA 6th. or Harvard style • All ideas from other authors should be fully cited using APA 6th. or Harvard style • Assignments that do not conform to all requirements will be awarded a mark of zero. • Assignments not received by the due date will not be marked, except in exceptional circumstances where approval has been received prior to the due date from the unit coordinator. • Accuracy in spelling, syntax, citation and referencing is strictly essential.
Grading Criteria and Feedback
• Evaluation will be based on your argument, completeness, appropriateness, justification and critical analysis. • The grading criteria for the individual assignment comprise the assessments of: • Content: 1. clearly address the topic with appropriate elaboration of relevant sub-topics, appropriately weighted and within the prescribed word count 2. demonstrate an understanding of the necessary concepts 3. use sufficient and appropriate material from relevant and credible sources to effectively support the key points
4. have adequate number and quality of references used
5. demonstrate the ability to critically reflect upon key ideas
6. drawn conclusions based on the evidence presented by them
• Structure/organisation: 1. the introduction is appropriate to the type and format of response and clearly outlines the focus 2. the body of the response is well structured, with coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections/paragraphs 3. each section/paragraph has a clear focus and line of thought
4. the conclusion is appropriate to type and format of the response, successfully summarising the key ideas • Writing expression:
1. the writing style is appropriate to the task 2. the writing is fluent, exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated 3. there are no spelling or typing errors and due regard is given to rules of capitalisation and abbreviation, etc. 4. key ideas from the literature are effectively interpreted and cited, and direct quotes are appropriately incorporated
• Presentation:
o the response conforms to the appropriate style guide advice and the requirements of the specified format (font, margins etc) • Referencing:
1. in-text citations and direct quotes follow referencing guide rules. 2. reference list and/or bibliography appropriately compiled.
Description of Task
• Using the case study allocated, each student must critically discuss the KM tools and KM techniques applied in the case organization • Student must discuss the outcomes of the implementation and compare this against one (only) of the KM Models presented in Lecture 3
Edited with the trial version of Foxit Advanced PDF Editor
To remove this notice, visit: www.foxitsoftware.com/shopping
La Trobe University
11
Assessment Task 2 Due Date % SILOs Assessed
Weekly tutorial in-class work Ongoing Weeks 2-12 20 1, 2, 3
Submission Details • 200 words hand-written class work must be submitted in class during the tutorial session only • Student must address the case in the journal/s and answer the questions. All work that does not address the case and does not answer the questions will be awarded a mark of zero • All ideas from other authors should be fully cited using APA 6th or Harvard style • Assignments not received by the due date will not be marked. • Accuracy in spelling, syntax, citation and referencing is strictly essential.
Grading Criteria and Feedback • Evaluation will be based on your argument, completeness, appropriateness, justification and critical analysis. • The grading criteria for the individual assignment comprise the assessments of: o Content: 1. clearly address the question with appropriate elaboration 2. demonstrate an understanding of the necessary concepts 3. use sufficient and appropriate material from relevant and credible sources to effectively support the key points 4. demonstrate the ability to critically reflect upon key ideas o Writing expression: 1. the writing style is appropriate to the task 2. the writing is fluent, exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated 3. there are no spelling or typing errors and due regard is given to rules of capitalisation and abbreviation, etc. 4. key ideas from the literature are effectively interpreted and cited, and direct quotes are appropriately incorporated
Description of Task
• Using the weekly journal/s, each student must answer the questions as directed by the tutor • Student must discuss the answers and refer to case study outlined in the journal/s
Assessment Task 3 Due Date % SILOs Assessed
Weekly tutorial online submission work Ongoing Weeks 2-12 20 1, 2, 3
Submission Details • Written tutorial work must be submitted online via the LMS submission link on Friday at 5:00 PM each tutorial week. • Student must elaborate the answers from the tutorial in-class work and link the answers to topics covered in lecture. All work that does not address the case and does not answer the questions will be awarded a mark of zero • All ideas from other authors should be fully cited using APA 6th or Harvard style • Assignments not received by the due date (Friday at 5:00 PM each tutorial week) will not be marked. • Accuracy in spelling, syntax, citation and referencing is strictly essential.
Grading Criteria and Feedback • Evaluation will be based on your argument, completeness, appropriateness, justification and critical analysis. • The grading criteria for the individual assignment comprise the assessments of: o Content: 1. clearly address the question with appropriate elaboration 2. demonstrate an understanding of the necessary concepts 3. use sufficient and appropriate material from relevant and credible sources to effectively support the key points 4. demonstrate the ability to critically reflect upon key ideas o Writing expression: 1. the writing style is appropriate to the task 2. the writing is fluent, exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated 3. there are no spelling or typing errors and due regard is given to rules of capitalisation and abbreviation, etc. 4. key ideas from the literature are effectively interpreted and cited, and direct quotes are appropriately incorporated o Presentation: 1. the response conforms to the appropriate style guide advice and the requirements of the specified format (font, margins etc) o Referencing:
1. in-text citations and direct quotes follow referencing guide rules 2. reference list and/or bibliography appropriately compiled
Description of Task
La Trobe University
12
• Using the weekly journal/s, each student must answer the questions as directed by the tutor • Student must discuss the answers and refer to case study outlined in the journal/s
Assessment Task 4 Due Date % SILOs Assessed
Weekly seminar participation Ongoing Weeks 1-12 10 1, 2, 3
Submission Details • Each student must attend the weekly lecture/seminar and actively participate in each discussion session. Attendance is considered as participation only if student actively participates in the lecture/seminar • Student must read the related topic for each lecture/seminar prior to attending classes • Hand-written class work may be required and must be submitted during the lecture/seminar session only
Grading Criteria and Feedback • Evaluation will be based on your argument, completeness, appropriateness, justification and critical analysis. • The grading criteria for the individual assignment comprise the assessments of: 1. Active participation and correctness in addressing topical issues during lecture/seminar 2. Effort in clearly address the question with appropriate elaboration 3. Understanding of the necessary concepts demonstrated in explaining topical issues 4. Sufficiently and appropriately use of material from relevant and credible sources to effectively support the key points 5. Ability to critically reflect upon key ideas 6. Writing expression
Description of Task
• Using the weekly topic, each student must participate in the lecture/seminar discussions
La Trobe University
13
Detailed Grading Criteria
Assessment Task 1 Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor or missing Marks awarded Content 3 marks Demonstrate an excellent understanding of KM concepts and the case study, and demonstrate the ability to critically reflect upon key ideas in the case study 2 marks Adequately answer the questions using the illustration in the case study 1 mark Insufficient content and not using the illustration in the case study 0 marks No content or content is missing ___ / 3 Structure/Organisation 3 marks KM concepts and case study effectively presented in logical, interesting sequence in the writing 2 marks KM concepts and case study presented in logical sequence in the writing 1 mark The writing is not perfectly in logical sequence but reader can still follow the content 0 marks The writing is out of sequence and the reader cannot understand the content ___ / 3 Writing Expression 3 marks Well articulated, with logical statements supported by the scenario and by the lecture material 2 marks Adequately written, with mostly logical/sensible arguments 1 mark Inadequate construction, with unsupported statements 0 marks Poorly written and difficult for the reader to follow ___ / 3 Presentation 3 marks Well presented and the response conforms to the appropriate style guide advice and the requirements of the specified format (font, margins etc) 2 marks Adequately presented and some of the response conforms to the appropriate style guide advice and requirements 1 mark Inadequate presentation 0 marks Poor presentation ___ / 3 Referencing 3 marks Referencing completely conforms to allowable methods 2 marks Referencing partly conforms to allowable methods 1 mark Referencing is poorly written and does not follow allowable methods 0 marks No referencing at all ___ / 3 Total marks awarded ___ / 15
La Trobe University
14
Assessment Task 2 Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor or missing Marks awarded Content 3 marks Demonstrate an excellent understanding of KM concepts and the case study, and demonstrate the ability to critically reflect upon key ideas in the case study 2 marks Adequately answer the questions using the illustration in the case study 1 mark Insufficient content and not using the illustration in the case study 0 marks No content or content is missing ___ / 3 Writing Expression 3 marks Well articulated, with logical statements supported by the scenario and by the lecture material 2 marks Adequately written, with mostly logical/sensible arguments 1 mark Inadequate construction, with unsupported statements 0 marks Poorly written and difficult for the reader to follow ___ / 3 Total marks awarded ___ / 6
Assessment Task 3 Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor or missing Marks awarded Content 3 marks Demonstrate an excellent understanding of KM concepts and the case study, and demonstrate the ability to critically reflect upon key ideas in the case study 2 marks Adequately answer the questions using the illustration in the case study 1 mark Insufficient content and not using the illustration in the case study 0 marks No content or content is missing ___ / 3 Writing Expression 3 marks Well articulated, with logical statements supported by the scenario and by the lecture material 2 marks Adequately written, with mostly logical/sensible arguments 1 mark Inadequate construction, with unsupported statements 0 marks Poorly written and difficult for the reader to follow ___ / 3 Presentation 3 marks Well presented and the response conforms to the appropriate style guide advice and the requirements of the specified format (font, margins etc) 2 marks Adequately presented and some of the response conforms to the appropriate style guide advice and requirements 1 mark Inadequate presentation 0 marks Poor presentation ___ / 3 Referencing 3 marks Referencing completely 2 marks Referencing partly conforms to 1 mark Referencing is poorly written 0 marks No referencing at all ___ / 3
La Trobe University
15
conforms to allowable methods
allowable methods
and does not follow allowable methods Total marks awarded ___ / 12
Assessment Task 4 Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor or missing Marks awarded Correctness and elaboration 3 marks Demonstrate a correctness and an excellent elaboration of KM concepts 2 marks Adequately answer the questions and provide simple elaboration 1 mark Insufficient content and not provide elaboration 0 marks No content or content is missing ___ / 3 Understanding and use of relevant material 3 marks Demonstrate solid understanding and appropriately use relevant material 2 marks Adequately answer the question and use some relevant material 1 mark Inadequate answer with unsupported statements 0 marks Poor answer and difficult for the other students to follow ___ / 3 Critical reflection 3 marks Demonstrate an excellent ability to critically reflect upon key ideas in the topic discussed 2 marks Adequately presented and critically reflect upon key ideas 1 mark Inadequate reflection 0 marks Poor reflection ___ / 3
Total marks awarded ___ / 9