Criteria Name Criteria Weight Not Attempted Needs Improvement Satisfactory Good Very Good Exemplary Analysis (45%) GLO1 GLO3 Task 1 5% Does NOT use any appropriate descriptive analysis tool. Use irrelevant or inappropriate descriptive analysis tool. Use appropriate descriptive analysis tool BUT there are errors in the analysis. Most relevant descriptive analysis tools are used BUT there are minor errors in the analysis. All relevant descriptive analysis tools are used with minor errors in the analysis. Skilful and comprehensive descriptive analysis of all relevant variables using variety of techniques. Task 2 15% Does NOT use any appropriate bivariate exploratory data analysis tool. Use irrelevant or inappropriate bivariate analysis tool. Use appropriate bivariate analysis tool to identify IVs, BUT there are errors in the analysis. Appropriate bivariate analysis tool is used, BUT NOT all relevant IVs are identified. All relevant IVs are identified using proper bivariate analysis technique, BUT minor issues noted. Skilful and comprehensive analysis of bivariate relationships is presented and all relevant IVs are identified. Either inappropriate predictive model is developed and/or analysis lacks All steps of modebuilding process missing. Relevant IVs are included in the predictive model, BUT some steps of model-building process missing. A predictive model is developed with All model-building steps included, BUT the final model is incorrect and/or there are many errors in the analysis. An appropriate predictive model is developed with All model-building steps presented BUT there are minor errors in the analysis. The final model includes those IVs that have predictive power with All steps in model-building process clearly presented. Model-building process is presented in logical/comprehensive manner AND the final model is correct. Interaction analysis is missing. Interaction analysis is incorrect. Analysis of interaction effects is presented BUT there are many errors. Interaction analysis is done correctly BUT wrong visualisation technique is used. Interaction analysis is presented accurately with proper visualisation technique BUT with minor errors. Masterful analysis of interaction effects supplemented by a correct visualisation. Task 3 15% Either inappropriate predictive model is developed and/or analysis lacks All steps of modebuilding process missing. Relevant IVs are included in the predictive model, BUT some steps of model-building process missing. A predictive model is developed with All model-building steps included, BUT the final model is incorrect and/or there are many errors in the analysis. An appropriate predictive model is developed with All model-building steps presented BUT there are minor errors in the analysis. The final model includes those IVs that have predictive power with All steps in model-building process clearly presented. Model-building process is presented in logical/comprehensive manner AND the final model is correct. Predicted probabilities are not calculated and/or a visualisation is missing. Not All Predicted probabilities are calculated and/or a visualisation is missing. All predicted probabilities are calculated and a visualisation is presented BUT there are many errors in the analysis. All predicted probabilities are calculated and a visualisation is presented BUT there are minor errors in the analysis. All predicted probabilities are calculated correctly and a proper visualisation is presented. A skilful and comprehensive analysis of predicted probabilities is presented along with a wellstructured visualisation. Task 4 10% Does not use any appropriate time-series techniques. Uses irrelevant or inappropriate techniques to analyse the time-series and/or there are many errors in the analysis. A relevant time-series model developed but there are many errors in the analysis. A relevant time-series model is developed and but there are minor errors in the analysis. Time-series model is developed correctly and relevant measure(s) for evaluating the model quality is presented. Time-series model developed correctly and presented in a clear and logical fashion including relevant visualisations. Interpretation (45%) GLO1 GLO5 Task 1 5% Does not communicate any of the main findings of the analysis in an accurate or meaningful way. Interpretation and communication of findings is at a basic level or does not adequately explain the main findings of the analysis. Explains the main findings of the analysis accurately and enables reader to draw some reasonable conclusions. Provides an accurate description of the most - BUT NOT ALL - important features of the analysis, with appropriate conclusions. Provides very detailed and accurate descriptions of the most important features of the analysis. Provides an outstanding description and conclusion of All relevant analysis/visualisation outputs. Interpretation of results are novel and insightful. Task 2 15% Task 3 15% Task 4 10% Technical Report GLO1 GLO5 - 10% The technical report is poorly structured and/or few sections missing with a poor use of technical language. The technical report is poorly structured. Only few analysis outputs are presented in appendix. Language is difficult to follow with many grammatical errors noted. The technical report is wellstructured with All required sections included. Most relevant analysis outputs are included in appendix. Communication is NOT clear throughout the report and grammatical errors noted. The technical report is wellstructured with All sections included. All relevant analysis outputs are included in appendix. Communication is clear with NO grammatical errors noted. The technical reports on par with a professional report. All relevant analysis outputs are presented in appendix in a logical order. Written communication is clear, easy to follow and has a structure. The technical report is masterfully structured. All relevant analysis outputs are included in appendix. Outputs are visually appealing, and follow a consistent formatting style. Language is truly professional and easy to follow OVERALL 100% (Equivalent of 35 Marks) 0-29% 30%-49% 50%-59% 60%-69% 70%-79% 80%-100% Overall Description Fail (n) Pass (P) Credit (C) Distinction (D) High Distinction (HD)