he tutor will return the marked assignment no later than 3 weeks after its submission.
Detailed
information
Research and find out as much information about 2 organisations you know well in New
Zealand and China. The organisations must be operating in the same industry. (i.e. Air
New Zealand and China Eastern Airlines).
Analyse the following and compare and contrast the similarities and differences across the
two organisations (Answer only 3 questions).
1. How does national culture influence the company culture in the two organisations?
What are the similarities and differences? Critically assess the key issues and justify
your arguments.
MGNT210 Subject Outline Autumn, 2017 Page 19 of 26
2. How does national culture influence leadership in the two organisations? What are the
similarities and differences? Critically assess the key issues and justify your arguments.
3. How does national culture influence the business strategy and organisational structure
of the company? What are the similarities and differences? Critically assess the key
issues and justify your arguments.
4. How does national culture influence how change is managed in the two organisations?
What are the similarities and differences? Critically assess the key issues and justify
your argu************ pass ************ment your essay must make extensive use of:
1. Relevant academic journal articles from the e-reading list
2. Relevant journal articles sourced via databases such as the Web of Science, Scopus or
ABI/INFORM Complete via UOW library.
3. Relevant chapters from your text book and other academic books.
4. Relevant and specific examples.
• Each section should be 400 words approximately.
• Introduction and conclusion should be approximately 250 words.
• 8 minimum academic references (journal articles or books) in addition to the company
websites and other web based references.
Marking rubric for
essay
HD D C-P F
Organisation of content
and response to the
questions
Logical,
intuitive
sequence of
information.
Message and
flow of content
are clear and
direct.
Logical
sequence of
information
but message
and flow of
content need
to be clearer
and more
direct.
Some logical
sequence of
information,
but message
and flow of
content need
to be clear
and direct.
No logical
sequence of
information
and message
and flow of
content are
flawed.
Addressed the questions Clearly
addressed and
analysed all the
questions in
depth
Most questions
were
addressed but
need more
depth in
analysis
Addressed
the questions
vaguely.
Need more
insight and
depth of
analysis
Did not
address the
questions
clearly
Argument A clear and
explicit
argument
communicated
to the reader at
the start of the
essay and
followed
throughout.
A good
argument
communicated
to the reader at
the start of the
essay and
followed
mostly through
the essay.
The
argument is
not clear or
not
coherently
presented in
the essay.
No clear
argument in
the essay.
Subject knowledge and
examples to justify
arguments
Subject
knowledge is
evident
throughout. All
information is
clear,
appropriate,
and correct.
Excellent
examples used
to compare and
contrast view
points and
analysis.
Subject
knowledge is
evident in
much of the
product.
Information is
clear,
appropriate,
and correct.
Some good
examples used
to justify
arguments.
Some subject
knowledge is
evident.
Some
information
is confusing,
incorrect or
flawed. No
relevant
examples
used.
Subject
knowledge is
not evident.
Information is
confusing,
incorrect or
flawed. No
examples
used.
Application of relevant
academic concepts/theor
ies to analysis
Quality of
reflection
indicates a
deep
understanding
of relevant
areas and
strong
application of
the theory and
concepts to
justify
arguments.
Quality of
reflection
indicates a
sound
understanding
of relevant
areas and
thorough
application of
the
theory/concept
s to justify
arguments.
There is little
demonstrated
understandin
g of the
relevant
areas and
very limited
application
of theory to
justify
arguments.
Poor analysis
and
interpretation
appear as
There is
inadequate
understanding
of the relevant
areas and
inadequate
application of
the
theory/concept
s to justify
arguments.
MGNT210 Subject Outline Autumn, 2017 Page 18 of 26
well.
The quality and quantity
of the research and
sources and referencing
techniques
Excellent
quality and
quantity of the
research and
sources used in
this reflection.
Excellent
referencing
citations used
throughout,
reference list
included,
Harvard style
used.
Very good
quality and
quantity of the
research and
sources. Good
referencing
style applied
throughout.
Minor
omissions in
reference list,
citations or
style.
The quality
and quantity
of the
research and
sources used
is little and
or very
limited.
Basic
attempt is
made with
respect to
referencing
style
throughout,
but there are
major gaps in
reference list,
citations or
style.
There is
inadequate
application of
research and
sources. No
referencing
style applied
throughout.