MacEwan University, ENGL 111 1 | P a g e
English 111 Summary and Evaluation Assignment
Objectives
In this assignment, you will do the following:
Write a summary of a non-fiction essay Write an evaluation of a non-fiction essay
Guidelines
This assignment requires you to use a more formal mode of writing than in your compare/contrast essay. Therefore, your language choice, or diction, needs to reflect the academic nature of this assignment. See your textbook for guidelines on using formal English in your writing.
The summary should be between 350–450 words, whereas the evaluation should be between 100–150 words. Thus, the total length of this assignment should fall between 450 and 600 words. Going dramatically above or below these limits will negatively affect your grade.
The first paragraph of your summary must clearly state all the following information: the title and writer of the essay; the essay’s original place of publication; the essay’s subject, thesis, purpose, method of development (e.g. causal analysis, narrative, compare/contrast), and its evidence.
The subsequent paragraphs of your summary, probably two to three, will summarize the main points of the essay. Make sure that you point to the author frequently, either by name or by the words author, writer, and so on, to clarify that you are summarizing the work of another.
In the evaluation, don’t give personal opinion; clearly state, using concrete reasoning and examples, the essay’s strengths and weaknesses.
MacEwan University, ENGL 111 2 | P a g e
Your Assignment
Choose one of the essays from the instructor’s essay choices below and write a summary and evaluation of it according to the guidelines above.
For referencing direct quotations from the essay that are longer than three words, give page references in parentheses.
Skip two lines between the body of the summary and the evaluation.
Essay Choices
Aaron Copland’s “How We Listen to Music” (eReserves) Margaret Wente’s “Who Could Object to Wind Power?” (eReserves)
How Your Assignment Will be Graded
Your summary will be graded on its content and the quality of its paraphrasing and its prose. In particular, your instructor will be looking for the following things in your writing: clarity, concision, and correctness (in grammar, punctuation, style, and APA or MLA format). When paraphrasing, or putting the original content in your own words, remember to completely change the words, phrasing, and sentence structure of the original. Inadequate paraphrasing can be construed as plagiarism. Also, because a summary should be objective and without opinion, avoid slanted language and choose your words very carefully in the summary portion of the assignment. Please see the grading guide on the following pages.
MacEwan University, ENGL 111 3 | P a g e
Summary and Evaluation Grading Guide
Criteria
Strong A+, A, A- 80-100%
Good B+, B, B- 70-79%
Satisfactory C+, C, C- 60-69%
Needs Work D+, D, 50-59%
Fail
049%
Content and Organization The summary clearly indicates the author’s subject, purpose, and method of development. The thesis is restated. Main ideas are covered and paraphrased accurately. Paragraphs are welldeveloped. Denotative (emotionally neutral) language is used. The summary ends in the same way the essayends. Evaluation clearly stated, using concrete reasoning and examples, the essay’s strengths and weaknesses. The assignment meets the
Sentences: Clear and correct sentence structure (does not include comma splices, fragments, runtogethers, mixed constructions, co-ordinate/parallel problems, dangling modifiers). Appropriate and effective sentence length, variety, and complexity.
MacEwan University, ENGL 111 4 | P a g e
Language and usage: Word choice is precise, concise, vivid, appropriate. Expressions are idiomatic and appropriate.
Documentation: The summary shows attentive adherence to MLA or APA formatting. Quotations are integrated smoothly and accurately.
Spelling, punctuation, and grammar: Correct
English Department Grade Equivalents
Letter Percent Grade Point Description
A+ 93 – 100 4.0 Markedly Superior: Writing is outstanding in every way A 87 – 92 4.0 A- 80 – 86 3.7 Excellent: Superior performance shows comprehensive understanding of subject materials; writing is error free in structure and grammar
_____________________________________________________
B+ 77 – 79 3.3 Very Good: Clearly above average performance; writing has several errors in structure and/or grammar B 74 – 76 3.0
B- 70 – 73 2.7 Good: Average performance reflecting good knowledge of subject materials; the writing has significant errors in structure and/or grammar
_____________________________________________________
MacEwan University, ENGL 111 5 | P a g e
C+ 67 – 69 2.3 Satisfactory: basic understanding of C 64 – 66 2.0 subject materials; writing errors in structure and/or grammar are persistent and significant C- 60 – 63 1.7 ______________________________________________________
D+ 57 – 59 1.3 Minimal Pass: marginal performance reflected in non-adherence to required D 50 – 56 1.0 subject materials; frequent errors in structure and/or grammar
_____________________________________________________
F Below 50 0.0 Fail: Unsatisfactory performance on subject materials; frequent writing errors hinder meaning ______________________________________________________
“Subject material” means concepts of particular writing task as well as content and development.