MGMT20132: ASSIGNMENT 2 Part 1 _____ + Part 2 _____ = _______ overall GROUP REPORT: BUSINESS CASE RUBRIC (Part 1) Group member surname Group Member student number Criteria Max Mark % Fail (0-49%) Pass (50-64%) Credit (65-74%) Distinction (75-84%) High Distinction (85-100%) Problem that needs solving or the reason the innovation is required is effectively articulated 5 5 0 2.5 3.25 3.75 4.25 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Insufficiently articulated Effectively articulated Convincingly articulated Very convincingly articulated, explaining the commercial potential well Superior articulation, explaining the commercial potential well, including other possible implications The benefits and significance of the generated ideas or solution or innovation are logically and persuasively argued 5 5 0 2.5 3.25 3.75 4.25 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Insufficiently addressed Effectively discusses the costs and benefits Convincingly discusses the costs and benefits Very convincingly discusses the costs and benefits, using logic effectively and credible justifications of the assumptions used Discusses the costs and benefits in a superior manner, using logic effectively and credible justifications of the assumptions used while appreciating the needs of all relevant stakeholders Business case components, concepts and theoretical treatment: 1) the problem, 2) benefits, 3) strategic response, 4) options analysis, 5) delivery of the recommended solution 20 20 0 10 13 15 17 20 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Insufficiently addressed Effective structure, and uses data and analysis well Very effective structure, and uses data and analysis well Very good structure, and uses data very well; and credible assumptions; demonstrating strong research and analytical capabilities Superior structure, and superior use of data; credible assumptions; demonstrates strong research and analytical capabilities; separates critical decision-making points out from detailed analysis for investors Coherence of arguments, theoretical integration, written communication, credible sources and reference standards skills 10 10 0 5 6.5 7.5 8.5 10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Insufficient Effective Good Very good Superior Team formation and role allocation; production of a Team Charter 5 5 0 2.5 3.25 3.75 4.25 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Insufficient Effective Good Very good Superior Team contribution (NB. Students will have the opportunity to evaluate peers using an online tool towards the end of Term, which means some teams may have marks allocated differently across the team.) 5 5 0 2.5 3.25 3.75 4.25 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Insufficient Effectively contributed. Attended some meetings, etc. Effectively and consistently contributed. Attended most meetings, etc. Effectively and consistently contributed. Attended all meetings, etc. Effectively and consistently contributed, and worked efficiently and cooperatively. Attended all meetings, etc. Moderation 0 0 0 Additional comments: Total Mark 50 50 Grade GROUP PRESENTATION: BUSINESS CASE RUBRIC (Part 2) Group member surname Group Member student number Criteria Max Mark % Fail (0-49%) Pass (50-64%) Credit (65-74%) Distinction (75-84%) High Distinction (85-100%) The 2 minute pitch or idea is effectively articulated 2.5 2.5 0 1.25 1.625 1.875 2.125 2.5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Poorly articulates Effectively articulates Convincingly articulates Very convincingly articulates Superior articulation of all the pertinent points The benefits and significance of the generated ideas or solution or innovation are logically and persuasively argued 5 5 0 2.5 3.25 3.75 4.25 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Insufficiently or poorly argues Effectively argues the costs and benefits Convincingly argues the costs and benefits Very convincingly argues the costs and benefits, using credible assumptions and analytical methods Argues the costs and benefits in a superior manner, using credible assumptions and analytical methods Business case components, concepts and theoretical treatment: 1) the problem, 2) benefits, 3) strategic response, 4) options analysis, 5) delivery 20 20 0 10 13 15 17 20 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Insufficiently and/or inconsistently addressed. Effective structure, and uses data and analysis well to present the components of the business case Very effective structure, and uses data and analysis well to present all components of the business case Very effective structure, and uses data and analysis very well to present all components, especially the scenarios and the recommended solution Superior structure, and uses data and analysis very well to present all components, especially the scenarios and the recommended solution, highlighting the commercial feasibility and sustainability benefits Structure and quality of the Powerpoint 10 10 0 5 6.5 7.5 8.5 10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Poor Effective Good Very good Superior Creativity 5 5 0 2.5 3.25 3.75 4.25 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Not creative. Some creativity. Creative. Very creative. Superior. Everyone has the opportunity to present “equally” 5 5 0 2.5 3.25 3.75 4.25 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Contributions were unbalanced, evidence of lack of cooperation within the group Contributions were mostly balanced and evidence of a good ability to cooperate within the group Contributions were balanced and evidence of a very good ability to cooperate within the group Contributions were balanced and evidence of a very good ability to cooperate within the group, lever off each other’s skillsets and the presentation was rehearsed in advance Contributions were optimally balanced and evidence of a very good ability to cooperate within the group, lever off each other’s skillsets and the presentation was extensively in advance Demeanour and general presenter skills 2.5 2.5 0 1.25 1.625 1.875 2.125 2.5 ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Lacked confidence and/or was uninteresting Appeared confident and interesting Appeared confident and was very interesting. Appeared confident and was very interesting. Engaged and/or impressed the audience effectively Appeared confident and was very interesting. Masterfully engaged and/or impressed the audience and/or would have inspired an investor to invest heavily in the project Moderation 0 0 0 Total Mark 50 50 Grade