IBU5HRM: Assessment 3 Marking Criteria Rubric Short Report – You are the International HRM Consultant writing this report to Flextronics STUDENT NAME: CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Fair (50 – 59%) Poor (<50%) MARK Introduction (10% of total mark) ☐ Excellent outline of purpose, scope and limitations; Clear and expertly written organisation/order of each section of the report The case study and context explained at an advanced level. Excellent understanding of the organisation. (8-10 marks) ☐ Clear and purposeful outline of purpose, scope and limitations; Clear and concise organisation/order of each section of the report. (7 marks) ☐ Clear and concise purpose, scope and limitations; Developed description of the case study and understanding of the context of the organisation – case study. Succinct organisation/order of each section of the report. (6 marks) ☐ Basic understanding of purpose, scope and limitations; Basic outline of case study and understanding of the context of the organisation – case study. Reasonable organisation/order of each section of the report. (5 marks) ☐ No clear purpose, scope or limitations or identification of the case study No clear understanding of the context of the organisation – case study. No organisation/order of each section of the report. ( 5 marks) /10 Identification and critical discussion of the issues in this case –including operations across different countries, customer & staffing issues. (20% of total mark) ☐ Report outlines the organisational context and the issues in the case study. High level of interpretative and analytical ability to critically analyse literature. (16-20 marks) ☐ Clear and concise description of the organisational context and issues in the case study; Evidence of comprehensive critical analysis. (14-15 marks) ☐ Ability to conceptualise and describe the issues in the case study; Evidence of critical analysis of the literature. (12-13 marks) ☐ Basic ideas formulated to link to the organisational context and the issues in the case study; Fundamental theories and concepts summarised. Simple analysis of the literature. (10-11 marks) ☐ No evidence of understanding or evaluating the issues in the case study. No summary of main theories and concepts; No critical analysis of the literature. (<10 marks) /20 Explain how HRM should ensure the issues with performance management and training and development are not repeated taking into consideration the international environment. (40% of total mark) ☐ Demonstrates outstanding ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. High level of interpretative and analytical ability to critically analyse literature. (32-40 marks) ☐ Demonstrates thoroughly consistent ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development Evidence of comprehensive critical analysis. (28-31 marks) ☐ Demonstrates consistent ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. Evidence of critical analysis. (24-27 marks) ☐ Demonstrates basic ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. Displays basic information. Simple analysis of the literature. (20-23 marks) ☐ No demonstrated ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. No critical analysis of the literature. (<20 marks) /40 Conclusion and Recommendation/s/ Solution/s and Implementation Plan Present your plan as an International HRM consultant to present to the company/case study (10% of total mark) ☐ An insightful and comprehensive summary of the report; Outstanding capacity to make recommendations for effective solutions relative to the identified issues and implementation plan exceptionally well developed. (8-10 marks) ☐ Ability to make sound evaluation of the report; Good ability to make sound recommendations relative to the identified issues and implementation plan very well developed. (7 marks) ☐ Above average ability to summarise the report; Sound recommendations related to the identified issues and implementation plan well planned. (6 marks) ☐ Reasonably clear summary of the report; Recommendations link well to the identified issues and basic implementation plan evident. (5 marks) ☐ Conclusion does not summarise the report; No clear recommendations or implementation plan. (< 5 marks) /10 Research and Referencing, including at least 15 contemporary (beyond 2006) refereed journal articles (10% of total mark) ☐ Evidence of extensive reading and research; Relevant literature used critically and analytically, presenting a balance of perspectives Excellent application of referencing throughout the document and the reference list. (8-10 marks) ☐ Evidence of wide reading and research; Evidence of critical and analytical use of relevant literature; Good application of referencing throughout the document and the reference list. (7 marks) ☐ Reading and research beyond set minimum. Use of relevant research to support findings; Reasonable application of referencing throughout the document and the reference list. (6 marks) ☐ Minimal reading and research – basic 15 contemporary (beyond 2006) refereed journal articles; Limited use of relevant research, demonstrating little engagement with literature; Average and sometimes inconsistent application of referencing with some errors throughout the document and the reference list. (5 marks) ☐ Inadequate reading and research – less than 15 contemporary (beyond 2006) refereed journal articles; Research is evident but is inappropriate or irrelevant; Numerous referencing errors throughout the document and the reference list. (< 5 marks) /10 Format, Clarity, Presentation and Proofreading (10% of total mark) ☐ Outstanding presentation thoroughly consistent with short report format; report style numbering well presented; high standards in writing academic style; Excellent headings that highlight the case study; High facility with academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Comprehensively accurate grammar, punctuation and spelling. (8-10 marks) ☐ Presentation thoroughly consistent with short report format and academic style; Excellent headings and numbering in accordance with short report format; Consistent application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Very accurate grammar, punctuation and spelling. (7 marks) ☐ Presentation consistent with short report format, clear numbering and academic style; Good headings; Good application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Generally, good grammar, punctuation and spelling. (6 marks) ☐ Presentation adequate in accordance with short report format, but not fully consistent with appropriate academic style; Adequate headings; Adequate application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Some errors in grammar, punctuation and/or spelling. (5 marks) ☐ Not using short report format; no short report numbering; no structure; no headings; Inadequate application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Unacceptable errors in grammar, punctuation and or spelling (< 5 marks) /10 Examiner: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: TOTAL  MARK    /100