Assignment 3b: Project Presentation - Marking Criteria Coordinator Name: Percent Score /100 Researcher Name: Percent Score /100 Designer Name: Percent Score /100 F 0-49 P 50-64 C 65-74 D 75-84 HD 85+ Project Coordinator(50%) F P C D HD 0-24 25-32 33-37 38-42 43-50 • Introduction and conclusion provide an excellent comprehensive context and overview of the chosen project and prototype design, including remaining constraints/issues. • Overall slide design highly consistent and professional. • Layout and design of each slide strongly complements talk and stimulates interest. • Always clear speech, excellent eye contact, highly engaging manner. Score / 50 Comments: Researcher(50%) F P C D HD 0-24 25-32 33-37 38-42 43-50 • Excellent and comprehensive explanation of why the prototype design is suitable, in terms of cultural, environmental, economic and technical points of view. • Excellent and comprehensive explanation of how the design might be realised. • Layout and design of each slide strongly complements talk and stimulates interest. • Always clear speech, excellent eye contact, highly engaging manner. Score/50 Comments: Designer(50%) F P C D HD 0-24 25-32 33-37 38-42 43-50 • Excellent and clear description of the design and its function. • The physical presentation of the model and the level of workmanship is excellent. • Layout and design of each slide strongly complements talk and stimulates interest. • Always clear speech, excellent eye contact, highly engaging manner. Score /50 Comments: Group component/prototype design (50%) F P C D HD 0-24 25-32 33-37 38-42 43-50 • Team cohesion highly visible in a well-coordinated and articulated presentation. • The design is highly original and innovative. • The design is highly appropriate for the context and the brief. • Physical representation of design idea (3D Model or drawing) is highly appropriate. Score /50 Comments: Further Comments: