HSW707 Assignment #2 Rubric – Group Assignment: Narrated PowerPoint Criteria Accomplished (HD) Competent (D) Developing (C) Beginning (P) Under developed (N) Additional feedback Clear articulation and presentation of a case study addressing a form of violence and abuse. (max 10) (8-10) This is a professional standard and sophisticated presentation of a case study. (7) This is a sound presentation of a case study suitable for professional practice. (6) This is a competent presentation of a case study suitable for professional practice. (5) This is a satisfactory presentation of a case study. (0-4) This case study presentation is not articulated clearly. Clear articulation and presentation of an intervention strategy. Consideration of the personal, cultural and structural levels and dimensions of gender and intersectionality in the intervention strategy. Supported and evidenced by theory. (max 40) (32-40) You have clearly presented a theory informed practice response that is very well supported by evidence and linked to multiple references. You have presented a sophisticated and thorough account of the different levels and dimensions demonstrating insight and extending the assignment discussion very well. (28-31) You have clearly presented a theory informed practice response that is well supported by evidence and linked to a good number of references. You have presented a very good account of the different levels and dimensions. (24-27) You have presented a practice response that has some connections made to theory. You have used the recommended reading material. The presentation offers a solid account of the different levels and dimensions. (20-23) This is a satisfactory presentation of a practice response and some links to theory have been made. You have demonstrated a beginning understanding of the different levels and dimensions. (0-19) This is not a satisfactory presentation of practice responses and is not well supported by theory. You have not drawn on enough reference material to develop the presentation. There is little engagement and discussion with the different levels and dimensions. Presentation of a well developed argument/rationale for the presented intervention strategy. Supported and evidenced by theory. (max 20) (16-20) The presentation offers a well-developed, nuanced and sustained argument for the practice response. (14-15.5) The presentation offers a very good argument for the intervention strategy. (12-13.5) The presentation offers a good rationale for the practice response. However the analysis is limited. (10-11.5) The presentation offers a rationale for the practice response. (0-9.5) The presentation does not present a well-developed rationale for the presented practice response. Summary of what was discussed during the small group meeting ( max 5) (5) Clear summary of small group meeting that reflects the breadth of content and flow of the meeting as well as demonstrating analytical ability in drawing together the main discussion areas (4) Clear summary of small group meeting that identifies diversity of content and gives an indication of the discussion (3) Summary of what was discussed during the small group meeting and gives some indication of the group meeting (2.5) Summary of what was discussed during the small group meeting (0-2.5) This is not a satisfactory summary of what was discussed during the small group meeting Identify how the group discussion has informed your practice response. Demonstrate awareness of your own personal and professional positioning and how this has informed your approach to processing the group discussion. (max 15) (13-15) This is a sophisticated account of diverse viewpoints. You have clearly identified how your personal and professional positioning informs both the way you make sense of other group member’s ideas and tracks shifts in your thinking around violence and abuse in general. (10-12) You have presented a thoughtful account of other points of view and how this has informed your own approach. Your consideration of your own personal and professional positioning is integrated into your account of your own decision making. (8-10) You have identified how the group discussion has informed your practice response including your thinking about others ideas as well as identification of the connection between your personal and professional positioning. (7-8) You have identified how the group discussion has informed your practice response. You have demonstrated awareness of personal and professional positioning. (0-6) You have not clearly identified how the group discussion has informed your practice response. You have not clearly demonstrated awareness of personal and professional positioning. Academic skills. (max 10) (8-10) The presentation is of a high standard and is professionally presented. You have used technology effectively and innovatively. All claims are substantiated with appropriate and accurate referencing. You have presented a clear account of your attendance at the Intensive and acknowledgement of your introduction to the group. (7) The presentation is effective, interesting and flows logically. You have used technology effectively. All sources are cited and you use some additional resources. You have presented a clear account of your attendance at the Intensive and acknowledgement of your introduction to the group. (6) This presentation is clear and easy to follow. It uses technology appropriately. Most sources are cited, although there are a few inconsistencies. You have presented a clear account of your attendance at the Intensive and acknowledgement of your introduction to the group. (5) A number of errors in presentation and errors in referencing are noted. There is room to further develop your technological presentation and skill. However overall there is evidence of adequate academic skills. You have presented a clear account of your attendance at the Intensive and acknowledgement of your introduction to the group. (0-4) This is not well developed or presented. There are frequent inconsistencies in referencing and some sources not cited. You have not used technology effectively. You have not presented a clear account of your attendance at the Intensive and acknowledgement of your introduction to the group.