ORG30002 - Leadership in Context – Individual Essay Assessment criteria and marking guide - Weight 20% Student Name: Length: 1500 -2000 words Criteria Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Excellent Marks Introduction Background - Scope and significance of the chosen topic -Identification and clear statement of issues through relevant literature search - Plan of argument (2 marks) Analysis and Discussion Provides coherent line of reasoning responsive to the assignment task Demonstrates originality and creativity (cite the sources of references) (7 marks) Critical thinking and evaluation from multiple perspectives Arguments used to strengthen the key points and justification for differences in perspectives (cite the sources of references) (4 marks) Conclusion Brief summary, consistent with analysis (2 marks) References/Bibliography Correct and appropriate referencing using Harvard referencing style throughout the essay (in-text referencing) and in the list of references (3 marks) Presentation/Format Use of appropriate presentation style; Font size 12; 1.5-line spacing Complies with Harvard citation requirements Word Limit – 1500 - 2000 words (2 marks) Additional Comments: Marked by:…………………… Total Marks………………/20   ORG30002 - Leadership in Context Assessment Task – 3 Group work - 30 Marks Criteria Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Excellent Marks Executive Summary (2 marks) Brief summary of the main contents of the report Introduction (2 marks) Background - Scope and significance of the chosen speech Evaluation of the elements of the speech linked to leadership theories (4 marks) (cite the sources of references) Critical examination and interpretation of the speaker’s arguments (5 marks) (cite the sources of references) Engagement with the theory through specific discussion of relevant quotes taken from the speech (5 marks) (cite the sources of references) Demonstration of originality or thoughtfulness of interpretation – i.e., an ability to think for oneself (cite the sources of references (4 marks) Key Learnings and recommendations for emerging leaders ( 2 marks) Conclusion (3 marks) Brief summary, consistent with analysis References/Bibliography (2 marks) Use of Harvard referencing style Presentation/Report Format Use of appropriate presentation style Word Limit – 2000 words (1 mark) Group Members: ORG30002 - Leadership in Context Critical Analysis Research Report – Marking Guide Max: 30 marks Student Name: Total: /30 Marks Criteria N P C D HD Marks Executive Summary/Abstract (2 Marks) Brief summary of the main contents of the report Introduction (3 Marks) Background - Scope and focus Identification of issues - Clear plan of argument including aims, objectives and purpose Analysis and Discussion (10 marks) Effective use and integration of relevant literature (use of appropriate theoretical constructs, ideas & findings from Refereed Journal articles) Use of adequate & relevant examples from selected film scenes and appropriate application of theoretical concepts Coherent line of reasoning/argumentative structure linking key aspects of leadership effectiveness model supported by research evidence Demonstration of critical analysis and evaluation of leadership effectiveness in selected film to demonstrate originality of interpretation and creativity Conclusion (3.0 Marks) Implications and a brief summary Appropriate conclusions from analysis & links to DuBrin’s model Usefulness of the model – Key learnings References/Bibliography (2.0 Marks) Citation of all evidences - Correct and appropriate referencing using Harvard referencing style throughout the report and in Bibliography; Citations – 15 Refereed Journal Articles Presentation/Format (2.0 Marks) Use of Report format /Word Count / Quality of Written communication – grammar, punctuation, spelling/Proof read / edited/ formatted/Line spacing/Font size Appendix (8.0 Marks) Specific Examples taken from the movie scenes to support underlying theoretical concepts of Leadership Effectiveness Model (To be presented in a Table format) Additional Comments: Marked by:   ORG30002- Leadership in Context Marking Rubric for Reflective Journal – Week 12 Name of the Student: Overall Score: ---/10 Criteria Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement Marks Personal Reflection (2.0 Marks) (Exploration – Link between Personal life/Learning/Engaging) Critical thinking (2.5 Marks) (Insightful Analysis and Synthesis – Experiences of unusual light bulb moments/Critical incidents) Structure of Ideas (2.0 marks) (Powerful thoughts & interpretation of concepts) Personal Progress & Leadership Development (2.5 Marks) (Evidence of commitment towards personal development and/or changes in behaviour & synthesis of learning experiences into goals or action plans for the future) Format (1.0 Mark) (Well written – Use of standard English - No grammatical or spelling errors – Line spacing – Professional formatting - Proof read) Additional Comments: Marked by: