Assessment 3 (2017 T1) Requirements Management Plan (RMP) ‘Information and templates Please read the following information. You will need to use the information to fill out the template for your specific project. Only submit the template – delete all other information. Scenario As the project manager you are not a member of the Project Board, but you do attend meetings to provide the members with status reports and to provide information on certain items on the agenda. The Board approved the Charter at the March meeting. At that meeting the Board asked you to complete the scope baseline and send it out of session. The secretary emailed you a week later and stated that the Board Members were happy with the progress on scope, however have not approved the baseline as there is some changes they want you to make. You emailed the secretary back and ask if he can send you specific details of the changes. NOTE: Please refer to the information and template for your specific project. . You must include a title page at the front of the template when submitting. Management Services - Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project This is the reply that you receive from the secretariat for the Management Services - Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project Board: As the project manager for the Management Services - Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project the following action has been raised by the Project Board out of session. 20170408_MSMBH_A01 Requirements Management Plan - Acknowledging Traditional Owners. The Project Executive has added that the Sunshine Coast Council want to include within the work of this project, replacement of signage within the park. The new signage is to have both English and the language of the Traditional Owners of the land in which the Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park is located. The intent of the signage is to acknowledge and show respect to the Traditional Owners of the Land. The Senior User noted that they cannot represent the Traditional Owners. As further information is required to understand the requirements relating to this request, a Requirements Management Plan specifically is to be developed for the next Board meeting. Given the time constraints the Project Board have agreed to the completion of a tailored Requirements Management Plan, which has significantly reduced information than what would normally be required in such a plan and concentrates specific information sort by the board members. The Template for this is attached. When completing the Requirements Management Plan you are to include information as per the template. The Board has asked that you use in-text referencing and include a reference list as per Harvard Referencing style, so they can clarify the source of the information and seek further detail from the source if necessary. You are also to delete any explanatory text or question which has been provided as blue italicised text in the template. Please also delete the inappropriate option within the heading of section 1.3.   Requirements Management Plan Template Acknowledging Traditional Owners. Management Services - Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project 1. Planning the requirement activities 1.1. Traditional Owners of Australia The traditional owners of Australia are the people from its Aboriginal communities besides them there are the federal government of the land and the common people who possess rights to the land. 1.2 Additional Senior User/s The Project Manager, Maheshwarreddy Bobba would represent the Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project. He would be the senior user as he has been responsible for the successful accomplishment of the project. He would be supported by an efficient project team to help out in this matter. The senior user in this case would overlook the project to ensure a smoother business operation to serve its targeted customers (Gido & Clements, 2014). Again the Aboriginal communities who stand as the traditional owners of Australia along with the fellow stakeholders has diverse interest in the successful completion of this project. But it is the stakeholders of the Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project who are directly engaged with the project and seems to be actively engaged to develop the business operations at the holiday resort. 1.3 Wording of ‘Welcome to Country’ The project for the Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project has been undertaken by the management of the resorts to reduce the overheads of the organisation and increase on its profitability. It would be done to provide a unique experience to the guests staying over there as in the service sector, the kind of services that the guests avail does matter a lot in its branding (Burke, 2013). The project would take into account the relevance of the front office services, back office management in likes of the food, kitchen and the service management, housekeeping, furniture, IT facilities and other amenities. So the project would conduct a thorough checking on the various facilities that the resort would offer to those staying over there. The phrase ‘Welcome to Country’ stands as the opening tagline for the project executive before the inauguration of the meeting. 1.4 Requirements gathering for options analysis The project design approved in this case could take reference from other clubs or resorts as felt necessary by the project team. It is quite obvious that the different stakeholders has different kinds of interest level in the project to renovate and regenerate the Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project. 2. Requirement Priority Process - MoSCoW technique MoSCoW Principle prioritises the technique in the management arena, business analysis process, software development and project management (Kerzner, 2013). It facilitates a simplistic understanding of the stakeholders regarding the suitability of the project delivery requirements. The benefit of the MoSCoW Principle lies in its prioritisation of delivering the greatest level of benefit. It is conceived to prioritise the project segregating it unto the optimal level of priority in terms of High, Medium and Low. It helps to attain the project objective quite efficiently (Burke, 2013). The relevance of the MoSCoW Principle would be readily applicable for the Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project. This is because it would prioritise the tasks that need to be contemplated with an initial thrust for the initiation of the project (Gido & Clements, 2014). The principle would categorise the element of Must have, Should have, Could have and Won’t have. Must have would be regarding a clarity in the task that is to be comprehended. Should have would be centring on the constitution of the project team to give a definite direction to the Mooloolaba Beach Holiday Park Project. Could have is concerned with the sufficiency of the funds that is being required for the successful completion of the project. Won’t have is concerned with the voluntary ideas that could be welcoming for the purpose but would not be soliciting those which lay out of the ambit of the project scenario. References Bibliography Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques. New Jersey: New Jersey, USA. Gido, J., & Clements, J. (2014). Successful project management. London: Cengage Learning. Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. London: John Wiley & Sons. Name, Position, Organisation Signature Project Executive Senior Supplier Senior User Project Manager