Short answer questions, eg one or two lines or brief comments on a mini case scenario) Rights( 200 words) 1. Distinguish between positive and negative rights. How are these rights justified? 2. Explain how the concept of equality places limits on rights. 3. How can conflicts between different rights be resolved? 4. Provide workplace examples of the rights to life, freedom and property. Normative Ethical Relativism(150 words) 1. What is normative ethical relativism and why do most ethicists reject ethical relativism yet accept the importance of managers recognising cultural differences? Application(200-250 words 1. Apply utilitarianism, Kantian deontology, justice, rights to the workplace Essay 800 words Friedman’s (1970) narrow view of corporate social responsibility is that the purpose of business is to maximise profits within the law. The broader socio-economic view is that enterprises are to be managed in the interests of their various stakeholders and that the moral minimum includes affirmative duties to prevent harm within the Kew Garden Principles. The maximal view is that business should help solve social problems (within the KGP). Discuss and critically evaluate the following viewpoints on corporate social responsibility: (i) the narrow classical economic view, (ii) the broader socio-economic view incorporating negative and affirmative duties to do no harm and prevent harm and the stakeholder theory, and (iii) the broad maximal view, including the duty to do good. Illustrate your discussion with reference to the question of business’ responsibilities to the environment (that is, how would each of the above viewpoints understand the responsibilities of business to the environment?).