BUSN20019: ASSIGNMENT 1 INDIVIDUAL Project Context and Proposal Enter name and student number Criteria Max Mark Fail (0-49%) Pass (50-64%) Credit (65-74%) Distinction (75-84%) High Distinction (85-100%) 1.1 Project context: Demonstrated ability to critically define the future profession 10 2 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ No attempt at defining the profession or no demonstrated ability to define the profession Demonstrated limited ability to define the profession; uncritical Demonstrated convincing ability to define the profession; mostly uncritical Demonstrated highly competent ability to define the profession; generally critical Demonstrated superior ability to define the profession; critical throughout 1.2 Project context: Demonstrated understanding of what it means to ‘become a professional’ in the future profession 15 3 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ No demonstrated understanding of what it means to ‘become a professional’ Demonstrated limited but satisfactory understanding of what it means to ‘become a professional’; uncritical Demonstrated convincing level of understanding of what it means to ‘become a professional’; may be uncritical Demonstrated highly competent level of understanding of what it means to ‘become a professional’; generally critical Demonstrated superior understanding of what it means to ‘become a professional’; critical throughout 2. Title, background, definition, justification 15 3 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic Title, background, definition& justification present; may be inconsistent but generally presented in an effective manner Title, background, definition& justification present; may be slightly inconsistent but generally presented in a convincing manner Title, background, definition& justification present; generally consistent and presented in a highly competent manner Title, background, definition& justification present; ALL are consistent and presented in a superior manner 3. Aim and objectives/research questions 10 3 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic Effective presentation of aim and objectives/RQs; may be inconsistent or somewhat unclear Convincing presentation of aim and objectives/RQs; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear Highly competent presentation of aim and objectives/RQs; consistent and clear Superior presentation of aim and objectives/RQs; entirely consistent and clear 4. Preliminary critical literature review 15 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic Effective review of a limited amount of suitable literature; effective structure; may be overly descriptive Convincingreview of an acceptable amount of suitable literature; well structured; may not be critical throughout Highly competentreview of a justifiably good amount of suitable literature; very well structured; generally critical and may clearly identify gaps to be addressed Superior review of a justifiably good amount of suitable literature; excellent structure; critical throughout; clearly identifies gaps to be addressed 5. Organisation of the project, including: secondary information sources, analysis approaches, milestones and Gantt chart 10 0 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate/ highly unrealistic for the topic Demonstrated ability to effectively organise the project; all aspects covered; may be somewhat unrealistic and/or inconsistent; lacks detail Demonstrated ability to convincingly organise the project; all aspects covered; generally realistic and consistent; may lack detail Demonstrated ability to highly competently organise the project; all aspects covered; realistic and consistent; may lack detail Demonstrated ability to organise the project in a superior manner; all aspects covered in appropriate detail; realistic and consistent throughout 6. Written communication, referencing and evidence of tutor engagement, quality and appropriateness of references and accuracy of references. 25 10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Poorly articulated and/or no demonstrated understanding of referencing & the quality of sources and/or no evidence of tutor engagement Effectively communicates ideas; demonstrates an acceptable understanding of referencing &the quality of sources; evidence of engaging with the tutor/coordinatoronce for project approval Convincingly communicates ideas; demonstrates a good understanding of referencing &the quality of sources; evidence of engaging effectively with the tutor/co-ordinator as required. Highly competently communicates ideas; demonstrates a very good understanding of referencing &the quality of sources; evidence of engaging effectively with the tutor/co-ordinator as required. Communicates ideas in a superior manner; demonstrates an excellent understanding of referencing &the quality of sources; evidence of engaging effectively with the tutor/co-ordinator as required. Moderation Additional comments: Late submission penalty (if applicable) Total Mark 100 26