Criteria 1: Ability to apply the proofs of larceny to determine if the proofs can be satisfied in the issues that arise in the case study. (5 marks) Criteria 2: Ability to explain with reference to the case study as to how police must apply LEPRA if they intend to question, search, or arrest or caution a suspect. (5 marks). Criteria 3: Ability to identify the alternatives that are available to police when dealing with the issues raised in the case study. (5 marks) Criteria 4: Ability to critically discuss LEPRA and the rule of law in outlining the type of actions, if any, you would take as a police officer concerning the matters raised in the case study. (6 marks). Criteria 5: Ability to critically reflect upon your decisions and discuss why you considered other alternatives were not as appropriate for dealing with the situations presented in the case study. (5 marks). Criteria 6: Ability to clearly express the arguments (free of spelling/grammatical errors) and structure the work according to academic conventions (2 marks) Criteria 7: Ability to accurately reference in the body of the review essay AND in documenting the source material correctly in a reference list (2 marks) Concerning the requirements of Criteria 3 & 4 I offer the following guidance. The following combines the requirements of Criteria 3 & 4. (i) Identify and discuss the alternatives open to police (arrest and charging, taking no action, on the spot caution, Summons; Court Attendance notice; Infringement notice) in dealing with the case scenario. (ii) Place yourself in the shoes of a police officer and make a decision on what type of action, if any to take (with reference to LEPRA and rule of law criteria). (iii) Reflect upon your actions and support your decision (this would involve discussing why you considered the other alternatives were not as appropriate for dealing with the situation presented in the case scenario). 7-MAY-2017 10:18 AM Need Admin assistance Student ASSESSMENT 3 CASE STUDY: DUE: 15/05/17 5:00pm: ESSAY:- 1500 WORDS References : Harvard style. Assessment Description 1. Using the following site identify the proofs of larceny (Theft). NSW Crimes Act 40/1900 117 (Case study "Its not yours until you pay" on Larceny to be provided below). Are these proofs able to be satisfied in the issues that arise in the case study. 2. Using the case study, explain how police must apply LEPRA if they intend to question, search, or arrest or caution a suspect. Abstract "WOULD you like some grapes?" I hear her say to the child in the trolley in the supermarket. "That's good - her kid likes fruit," I think, but am then a little surprised to see her take a bunch of grapes from the display bin, and hand it to the toddler. He proceeds to munch on it. I continue choosing the fruit I want, only to hear her say a little later "Do you want a peach?" She picks a nice one, breaks it into manageable chunks, and gives it to the kid. There's no way this stuff is going to be weighed and paid for when she reaches the checkout. Full text "WOULD you like some grapes?" I hear her say to the child in the trolley in the supermarket. "That's good - her kid likes fruit," I think, but am then a little surprised to see her take a bunch of grapes from the display bin, and hand it to the toddler. He proceeds to munch on it. I continue choosing the fruit I want, only to hear her say a little later "Do you want a peach?" She picks a nice one, breaks it into manageable chunks, and gives it to the kid. There's no way this stuff is going to be weighed and paid for when she reaches the checkout. Another day, in the same supermarket, an elderly woman pulls bananas from a bunch, leaving behind the stalks attached to the rest of the fruit, presumably so she will not have to pay for the bits she can't use. I think if she could, she would leave the skins there too. In another row the guy removes the green stalks from the hydroponic tomatoes so they look like the ordinary, cheaper ones and he will pay for them as such, and wanders off. I join the queue at the checkout. It's long and boring, and most of the women waiting take magazines from the racks and read them until it's their turn to be served. The magazines, in many cases looking well-thumbed, are stuffed back with the others on the stand, and nobody says anything. It appears this is acceptable, and may indeed be considered by the female shoppers as their right, perhaps in compensation for having to wait a few minutes. It doesn't matter that other customers will be buying second-hand goods, or that shoppers, having read the latest gossip in their quick flick through the magazines, will not buy them to read more thoroughly at home. Another day, a different supermarket, a woman ignores the supplied hygienic metal scoop and takes a handful of nuts from the display case, then continues shopping, all the time eating the almonds. Shortly afterwards, she goes back to the case and puts a couple more handfuls into her plastic bag, and starts munching. This time she sees my horrified look and quickly moves away, her jaws moving all the time. All these people look easily able to pay for what they have taken. Do they not consider that what they are doing is just as much shoplifting as taking fruit or magazines from the supermarket without paying for them? Surprisingly enough a Google search shows that many people consider it's fine to do it, and that it is not theft, which it is. And anyway, whatever it is, in the end it's just plain tacky. 3. Identify the alternatives that are available to police when dealing with the issues in this case study. Arrest or Caution or Summons or Court Attendance Notice or Unofficial Caution. Remember this assessment is not an integrity test its about the most appropriate way to deal with the issues of alleged theft that arise in the case study. You choose how you want to deal with the matter and use the appropriate LEPRA and rule of law criteria. 4. Reflect on the police action and present any alternatives to arresting and charging. 5. Quotes and sources must be referenced appropriately. A minimum of six references properly used are r************ pass ************sment.