MGT5PSC: Assessment 2 marking rubric CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Acceptable (50 – 59%) Unacceptable (<50%) Sapphire Energy report: response to questions posed (30% of total mark) ☐ Provides an insightful and accurate evaluation of the current system, based on rigorous and in-depth research. Includes correct and accurate calculations. Makes concise and appropriate recommendations for improvements. (24-30 marks) ☐ Provides an accurate evaluation of the current system, based on solid and in-depth research. Includes correct and accurate calculations. Makes concise and appropriate recommendations for improvements. (21-23 marks) ☐ Provides a good evaluation of the current system, based on research. Includes correct calculations. Makes appropriate recommendations for improvements. (18-20 marks) ☐ Provides a fair evaluation of the current system. Makes a fair attempt at appropriate recommendations for improvements. (15-17 marks) ☐ Provides little or no evaluation of the current system. Calculations incorrect or missing. Recommendations missing or of poor standard. (<15 marks) AusCotton Clothing report: response to questions posed (30% of total mark) ☐ Correctly identifies, explains and discusses global and ethical issues relevant for strategic sourcing. Makes concise and appropriate recommendations for improvements. (24-30 marks) ☐ Correctly identifies and explains global and ethical issues relevant for strategic sourcing. Makes concise and appropriate recommendations for improvements. (21-23 marks) ☐ Correctly identifies and explains some of the global and ethical issues relevant for strategic sourcing. Makes appropriate recommendations for improvements. (18-20 marks) ☐ Provides a fair attempt at identifying some global and ethical issues relevant for strategic sourcing. Makes a fair attempt at appropriate recommendations for improvements. (15-17 marks) ☐ Provides little or no attempt at identifying relevant global and ethical issues. Recommendations missing or of poor standard. (<15 marks) Critical analysis (25% of total mark) ☐ Introduces ideas and concepts clearly and logically, demonstrating a deep understanding of the material covered. Justifies all arguments with reference to the relevant theories and concepts. (21-25 marks) ☐ Introduces ideas and concepts clearly, demonstrating a good understanding of the material covered. Justifies most arguments with reference to the relevant theories and concepts. (18-20 marks) ☐ Introduces most ideas and concepts clearly, demonstrating a good understanding of the material covered. Makes a good attempt at justifying arguments with reference to relevant theories and concepts. (15-17 marks) ☐ Makes a fair attempt at introducing ideas clearly. Poor or missing justification of arguments with reference to relevant theories and concepts. (13-14 marks) ☐ Ideas are not presented clearly, demonstrating little or no understanding of the material covered. Little or no attempt to refer to relevant theories and concepts. (<12 marks) (CONTINUED OVER PAGE…)