- Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing Weighting: 25% (15% for the report and 10% for the presentation) THERE ARE NEW AND EXCITING DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE TAKING PLACE IN THE BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE LITERATURE THAT IS CONSTANTLY SHAPING THE USE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND DATA WAREHOUSING TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS IN ORGANIZATIONS. THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THIS RESEARCH PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE A FORUM FOR STUDENTS TO INVESTIGATE THE PRACTICE, APPROACHES AND UNDERSTANDING OF BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AS IT IS BEING APPLIED IN THE REAL WORLD TO REALIZE ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES. TOPIC: Organizational culture and its impact on business intelligence/analytics You will also submit a 9-10 pages report (about 3000 words not counting cover page and references) of this project. Team must also comment on the social, ethical, global, and legal considerations of this research topic, both from the organizational as well as consumer perspective. At least 15 references in your report must be from peer-reviewed sources. Include any and all sources of information including any person(s) you interviewed for this project. Please note that all references must adhere to APA style. Marks would depend on following factors: 1. Depth of research to illustrate the BI application chosen 2. Quality of reference provided 3. Quality of overall team presentation 4. Quality of report writing Score Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (0) Presentation /Layout /2 marks Information is well organized, well written, and proper grammar and punctuation are used throughout. Correct layout used. Information is organized, well written, with proper grammar and punctuation. Correct layout used. Information is somewhat organized, proper grammar and punctuation mostly used. Correct layout used. Information is somewhat organized, but proper grammar and punctuation not always used. Some elements of layout incorrect. Structure /2 marks Structure guidelines enhanced Structure guidelines followed exactly Structure guidelines mostly followed. Some elements of structure omitted Introduction /2 marks Introduces the topic of the report in an extremely engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives a detailed general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the paper. Introduces the topic of the report in an engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives some general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the paper. Satisfactorily introduces the topic of the report. Gives a general background. Indicates the overall "plan" of the paper. Introduces the topic of the report, but omits a general background of the topic and/or the overall "plan" of the paper. Discussion of topics /8 marks All topics discussed in depth. Displays deep analysis of issues with no irrelevant info. Consistently detailed discussion. Displays sound understanding with some analysis of issues and no irrelevant information Most topics are adequately discussed. Displays some understanding and analysis of issues. Inadequate discussion of issues Little/no demonstrated understanding or analysis of most issues and/or some irrelevant information. Conclusion /2 marks An interesting, well written summary of the main points. An excellent final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. A good summary of the main points. A good final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. Satisfactory summary of the main points. A final comment on the subject, but introduced new material. Poor/no summary of the main points. A poor final comment on the subject and/or new material introduced. Referencing /4 marks Correct referencing (APA). All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Correctly set out reference list. Mostly correct referencing (APA). All quoted material in quotes &acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Mostly correct setting out reference list. Mostly correct referencing (APA ) Some problems with quoted material and paraphrased material Some problems with the reference list. Not all material correctly acknowledged. Some problems with the reference list. SubTotal-1 /20 marks Criteria Marks Introduction /1 Content /4 Conclusion /1 Presentation Styleeg clarity, engagement /2 Team participation /1 Timing (10-15 minutes) /1 SubTotal-2 /10 General Comments: